they are simply not superhumans with horse lungs and race car speed like a roberto carlos or cafu would be. you're describing tendencies which wouldn't be realistic for these players, so i simply believe that the scenario you've put up above is not realistic to me.
So only Bobby Carlos and Cafú can play as wingbacks. Anyone else who ever played wingback was a fraud.
I guess we will have to agree to disagree.
Rivaldo was definitely not a shabby passer.
I never said that.
i also think you're wrong to say michel is lazy, he's nothing exceptional in his workrate, but nothing exceptionally detrimental either. he was a winger with great stamina and at least the ability to track back.
I acknowledged earlier I thought he would be the only one likely to engage in any defending but Gio had been adamant he was keeping him out wide ready to exploit the space behind Brehme.
You are right, he is
not lazy, the point was he was one of three being asked to do feck all defensively (at times, other times they are tracking back and defending as 9 men, it all depends on whether I have the ball or he has just got it back).
At the tail-end of his career he even got accommodated into a wingback role of sorts. I've no problem being fair to him, it was just him being painted as someone utterly free upfront and some ridiculous stats that got brought up.
lastly i think koeman popescu is really undesirable. two sweeper type players that preferred having the ball over defending, and you have two of them as your last 3 defenders in what is basically a 3-5-2 pretending to be a 4-1-2-1-2.
I'm not going to bother with this. You too seem under the illusion that being good on the ball means you are a sweeper and being limited means you are a stopper.
Koeman was a stopper. If you think about it, every one of his weaknesses points out that he is no sweeper. He didn't roam forward much, he far preferred to dictate and pass from deep, which was the fundamental difference between him and Popescu (who preferred ball carrying and more of a libero role). That's why Popescu ultimately didn't work as the Koeman replacement and actually ended up playing primarily as a midfielder.
I could see the point in that discussion in the previous game, but Popescu is playing as a DM here, not sweeper. He is primarily concerned with coming out and closing down Rivaldo in the hole and anchoring the midfield. As you point out, Koeman has the right partner in Thuram. No need to overcomplicate thinking about Koeman and Popescu.
you got schweinsteiger and cocu, two terrific two way players that have box to box ability almost unparalled, but no playmaker
Wait, what? I get through all that stick for playing Koeman but I have no playmaking? Seriously? Cocu isn't going box-to-box either. I like box-to-box Cocu, but that's not the one playing here.
you depend on massive movement by schweinsteiger and cocu, that i think simeone and davids will more then match them. simeone especially will probably dominate schweinsteiger indvidually in my view, the man was an animal defensively and physically. Davids will do fine against cocu as well.
The problem is if Simeone is on Schweini and Davids on Cocu, who is then onto the two wingbacks... Oh, I see, you don't think they can. And Koeman and Popescu can't playmake... And Bergkamp is probably being picked up by... dunno really, don't think Kohler/Campbell would come out into midfield to pick someone up like that.
But yeah, if you assume Bergkamp is taken care of despite no one on him, none of my players can playmake, and my wingbacks can't get forward, then yes, Davids and Simeone are doing an awesome job on Scweini and Cocu.
neither davids or simeone are neanderthals technically either, they could very much play, make difficult touches and make neat passes, they weren't hagi's or maradonas, but they were quite decent.
Never said they were that limited. Just don't think they are anything anywhere near as worrying as Rivaldo, which is why I said the midfield three would jointly work on that. It's obviously not all three man-marking Rivaldo but he is the focal point for their joint efforts. Reasonable?