Redcafe Champions League Draft - Theon v NM/BD

Who will win based on players in their prime, team tactics, balance & bench strength?


  • Total voters
    41
  • Poll closed .
Familiarity and Compatibility: Gilberto-Vieira is a title winning and Invincible midfield. Lampard-Drogba is the attacking partnership that helped Chelsea win the league and CL. Both were part of the spine backbones of two of the greatest EPL teams ever - Arsenal's invincibles and Mourinho's Chelsea. Vidic and Popescu are also a natural partnership. Vidic to perform his usual role, and Popescu to sweep things up instead of Rio.

Superior Wingplay - Maicon and Giuly are a natural partnership. Giuly will cut inside as he feels like, and Maicon will bomb on down as needed. Candela will be overwhelmed defensively, and will contribute nothing going forward. On the other wing, Figo will pin Cafu back, and (IMO) will get the better of him. Similarly, Sergi will be able to go forward due to the lack of natural width in Theon's team.

Superior Physicality - My team is physically much bigger and stronger than Theons. We also have great set piece takers like Figo, Maicon, Lampard and the Drog. Any corner or free kick is a great opportunity for any one of Vidic, Drogba, Vieira, Gilberto, Lampard or Popescu to score.

Midfield Stalemate - Gilberto, Vieira and Lampard are more than a match for Theon's midfield. I will also have the opportunity to play the ball out wide, or hit it up to the Drog if it gets overcrowded in there. Something his team will not. All in all, I see a real battle in there, but I have options he does not.

Exploit Theon's lack of width - this is separate from the wingplay as Theon's lack of width will pull Gattuso/De Rossi out of position, or allow me free reign over the flanks. If they move out of position, that leaves Lampard alone with Pirlo.. I would fancy Lampard to get a hattrick if so... He will say his full backs will be used to provide the width, but if they venture too far forward, Figo/Drogba will be waiting to hit them on the break. Theons team is very vulnerable on the break with

Reiterating my thoughts here.

Do people not see the obvious midfield stalemate with Giuly dropping in? What about my free goals from set pieces? Or how his boys will start rolling around diving once my players get a hold of them? If my wingers get the ball, his midfielders HAVE to cover, leaving Iniesta and De Rossi in midfield against Lamapard and Vieira surging forward. If a cross comes in, that is goals galore? I don't get it. I don't think people are seeing that match in the head the way I am.
 
NM built a side to bully the opposition and has run into a wall here.

I don't think I ever voted for a diamond and always thought if I ever would it would have to look like that Milan side.

I love width, but every time the caf argues wingerless formations and how fullbacks aren't enough I think of Cafú and Carlos for Brazil or with Candela at Roma.

Theon has nailed down both, I just can't see past him.

NM doesn't have a bad side but the only thing I highly rate there (note: relative to the oppo, I do rate the players and the Chelsea/Arse pairs) is that defensive pair of Popescu and Vidic and their ability to deal with Crespo-Kluivert. I really like both pairs, but the one from the Balkans more so.

That said, they weren't the fastest. We know how Vidic can struggle with pace and Popescu, while great at reading the game and anticipating danger, was probably Ayala level, if not slower. Crespo and Kluivert are not exploiting that much one on one, but it certainly leaves no room for either fullback to get adequate cover.

I can see Theon's argument of throwing Aguero in there to take advantage of tired legs and exploit the flanks/peg back the FBs even more. Early in the game Sergi/Maicon may not worry too much about Aguero on the prowl, but late in the game they'll know they don't have the legs to recover and track back.

That's exactly how that Milan/Italy side would approach the game, soak up pressure, run down the opponent physically and mentally, and rip them apart with surgical precision.


Don't understand how people will talk about pace over the top. One of the reasons we chose Lloris is becausse he is BRILLIANT at coming out and sweeping the ball up. Balls over the top will be of no use. Vidic does not struggle against pace. He struggled against Fernando Torress. One (SHITE) player.
 
There is a lot that is very questionable about NM's write up, but these two points are just nonsense.

"Superior Physicality - My team is physically much bigger and stronger than Theons."

Kluivert, Crespo, De Rossi, Gattuso, Cafu, Nadal and Thiago Silva are all physically imposing. Lampard will be dominated by Gattuso and De Rossi, whilst Gilberto tries to get to grips with Iniesta.

Then this is also absolutely wrong and shows that NM doesn't know about Nadal.


Nadal is the only player in your team who is close to mine. I'm talking about physicality helping me at set pieces. You haven't argued that bit.

Also, If you think Lampard will be "dominated" by Gattuso or Inzaghi, you are spinning a tale you know that is false. The same way he "dominated" Michael Carrick or Scholes whenm we beat them 7-1, or they only beat us 2-1 with Scholes sent off

At any set piece, my boys will have free reign. People may not like that I have focussed on set pieces, but it is a valid part of the game!

:lol:
 
Theons got my vote. I was going to wait til Aguero came on but I may not be online and he's already indicated that it's firmly an option he's likely to use.

I agree with a lot of what antohan has said and also what thegame said about Litmanen, I prefer him to Lampard despite the Lampard and Drogba connection. It would add more creativity and keep Theons CBs occupied more consistently, making it more difficult for his wingbacks to get forward. Gattuso will definitely be occupied by Figo (Figo is magical, I think he would slip even Gattuso atleast once or twice) but I still think it will be really hard for NM to score.

Iniesta will make the big difference IMO, switch him with either Litmanen or Lamaprd and I'd probably vote the other way (not hugely surprising since he was Theons first pick).
 
Nadal vs Drogba
Leading the defence is the imposing Miguel Nadal, stalwart of Barcelona’s defence for nearly a decade and the captain of the Spanish national team. The Beast of Barcelona was exceptionally strong and is the perfect foil for the physicality of Drogba.

Whilst Drogba can bully lesser defenders he couldn’t bully Vidic and he won’t bully Nadal.

NM's thoughts: Stalwart of Barcelona's defense and the Spanish national team for a time when they didn't win a whole lot?

Alot more nonsense being stated here by NM - but had to respond to this.

Here is a list of what Nadal won at Barcelona..

European Cup: 1991–92
UEFA Cup Winners' Cup: 1996–97
UEFA Super Cup: 1992, 1997
La Liga title: 1991–92, 1992–93, 1993–94, 1997–98, 1998–99
Spanish Cup: 1996–97, 1997–98
Spanish Supercup: 1991, 1992, 1994, 1996
 
Alot more nonsense being stated here by NM - but had to respond to this.

Here is a list of what Nadal won at Barcelona..

European Cup: 1991–92
UEFA Cup Winners' Cup: 1996–97
UEFA Super Cup: 1992, 1997
La Liga title: 1991–92, 1992–93, 1993–94, 1997–98, 1998–99
Spanish Cup: 1996–97, 1997–98
Spanish Supercup: 1991, 1992, 1994, 1996


Hey its 3 in the morning. And I did say early 90s!

Cut me some slack!
 
Is the general consensus that I should bring Lampard off and play Litmanen in a 4-2-3-1??

I'll do that before going back to sleep then.
 
Moral of this draft : Don't ever go for Chelsea partnerships. The bloke with the Chelsea defense and now this.

True. I think they are hated too much. I have too many Arsenal and Chelsea players. Oh well, shit happens. What are your thoughts on shifting Lampard for Litmanen?

Also, to be fair, the guy with the Chelsea defense had Gallas at fullback. I flayed him for that too!
 
Nadal is the only player in your team who is close to mine. I'm talking about physicality helping me at set pieces. You haven't argued that bit.

Also, If you think Lampard will be "dominated" by Gattuso or Inzaghi, you are spinning a tale you know that is false. The same way he "dominated" Michael Carrick or Scholes whenm we beat them 7-1, or they only beat us 2-1 with Scholes sent off

At any set piece, my boys will have free reign. People may not like that I have focussed on set pieces, but it is a valid part of the game!

:lol:

I am talking about set pieces.

Crespo was great in the air, but Kluivert was legendary - he is a monster at heading. They are 6 ft and 6 ft 2 respectively, so no idea how you can ignore that height! Then you have Thiago Silva, Nadal, De Rossi and Gattuso

Gattuso is the biggest nutter on the pitch, he would eat Lampard from breakfast!
 
Lampard for Gilberto? I think you would have to take off Lampard to bring on Jari. Last throw of the dice but the game looks sealed to be very honest.
 
Yes. That's what I meant. I'm sleepy!
 
FORMATION CHANGE - THEON PLEASE PUT IN OP

755460_Champions_League_Team.jpg
 
Don't understand how people will talk about pace over the top. One of the reasons we chose Lloris is becausse he is BRILLIANT at coming out and sweeping the ball up. Balls over the top will be of no use. Vidic does not struggle against pace. He struggled against Fernando Torress. One (SHITE) player.

I don't know how this relates to my post in any way but I may as well clarify I never mentioned that.

What I did say was I liked your CB pair and that was the one combination of yours I rated very highly relative to what they faced. It isn't a case of me not rating Crespo and Kluivert (very much the opposite, and I think you are overlooking Kluivert as the highest ever Dutch NT scorer) but your pair is superb both individually and as a partnership. The only thing I pointed out (and it is valid) was their pace. I don't think it would be problematic as far as keeping up with their men, but I can't see them providing any cover to the fullbacks. It's not a biggie as it is (bar for Iniesta going to receive out wide on either flank) but once Aguero comes on it becomes more problematic.

I also like your other pairs and agree it is unfair to pick on Gilberto in isolation. He did form a great partnership with Vieira but when you hype that pair and what Arsenal accomplished with them you are blissfully ignoring the midfield facing you shat on Europe and then the World, not the PL.

Lampard-Drogba is also excellent and worked primarily due to the relentless pressure Chelsea exerted on their opposition. Drogba knockdown/chaos in the box/loose ball, cue "jammy" Lampard deflected goal or peno. I can't see you exerting such pressure and dominance here.

Overall, I just couldn't see you winning this, regardless of whether Litmanen gets on the pitch, so I didn't see any point in sitting it out to the end.
 
Theon's drafted near perfectly to pull off the diamond formation. I recall Jankulovski and Oddo running riot down the wings against us in Milan's diamond formation (we had Ronaldo playing that night too) so I'm not buying the lack of width accusations, not with Cafu and Candela as the wing backs and Gattuso and De Rossi there to fill in the gaps when necessary.
 
:wenger:

You're asking who is going to feed the strikers in a team that has Iniesta and Pirlo?

This is insane NM. My team has absolutely unmatched creativity - Iniesta will be running rings around Gilberto 'How the hell have you been drafted' Silva and constantly slip through balls into Crespo/Kluivert.

It's not insane. They're not exactly players that run onto the ball or dribble past players. It's a very set pieces, score with headers kind of set up you've got there. Pirlo isn't going to magically provide assists from the deep. Despite full backs attacking NM/BD's defense just have to keep themselves compact. Defend like you would against Barcelona but with more pressing as you don't have to deal with as many through balls, runs from the flanks cutting in or Messi.
 
It's not insane. They're not exactly players that run onto the ball or dribble past players. It's a very set pieces, score with headers kind of set up you've got there. Pirlo isn't going to magically provide assists from the deep. Despite full backs attacking NM/BD's defense just have to keep themselves compact. Defend like you would against Barcelona but with more pressing as you don't have to deal with as many through balls, runs from the flanks cutting in or Messi.

Yeah, it is. Iniesta and Pirlo are the two most creative players on the pitch - yet you are asking how my team will create chances for my strikers.. Okay.

On the bolded - are you talking about Iniesta and Pirlo there, because that is absolutely mental if true. They are both outstanding dribblers, Iniesta is one of the best dribblers of all time. He runs rings around better players than Gilberto and has the creativity to slip throughballs into the strikers the entire game. But according to you we will rely on a set piece? :wenger:

If you are talking about the forwards then Crespo absolutely is a player who runs onto the ball, his whole game was based around leading the line and getting goals. If there is one striker on the pitch who isn't a dribbler or someone who runs onto the ball then its Drogba.

Absolutely ridiculous that you would level that accusation at Crespo/Kluivert but not at Drogba.
 
Nadal is the only player in your team who is close to mine. I'm talking about physicality helping me at set pieces. You haven't argued that bit.

Also, If you think Lampard will be "dominated" by Gattuso or Inzaghi, you are spinning a tale you know that is false. The same way he "dominated" Michael Carrick or Scholes whenm we beat them 7-1, or they only beat us 2-1 with Scholes sent off

At any set piece, my boys will have free reign. People may not like that I have focussed on set pieces, but it is a valid part of the game!

:lol:

you were either very sleepy or deliberately misrepresenting things. We beat Roma 7-1 and not Milan (for whom Gattuso and Pirlo played). If you remember the 2007 matches against Milan or even Milan during the 2003-07 period, you wouldn't be talking so lightly about Gattuso being set on someone.
 
I bet he was really sleepy. There's a lot wrong with that post. He thinks Gattuso plays for Roma and I'm not sure why Inzaghi was brought into the discussion either! :lol:
 
you were either very sleepy or deliberately misrepresenting things. We beat Roma 7-1 and not Milan (for whom Gattuso and Pirlo played). If you remember the 2007 matches against Milan or even Milan during the 2003-07 period, you wouldn't be talking so lightly about Gattuso being set on someone.

I bet he was really sleepy. There's a lot wrong with that post. He thinks Gattuso plays for Roma and I'm not sure why Inzaghi was brought into the discussion either! :lol:


Right. I was sleepy. I meant De Rossi when talking about Roma, but I was half asleep. I do remember the 2007 matches against Milan. To be fair, we did well (302 at OT) but then got thumped 3-0 in the middle of a title challenge at the San Siro..

I have no clue how I came up with Inzaghi. Sorry about that!

:lol:
 
Yeah, it is. Iniesta and Pirlo are the two most creative players on the pitch - yet you are asking how my team will create chances for my strikers.. Okay.

On the bolded - are you talking about Iniesta and Pirlo there, because that is absolutely mental if true. They are both outstanding dribblers, Iniesta is one of the best dribblers of all time. He runs rings around better players than Gilberto and has the creativity to slip throughballs into the strikers the entire game. But according to you we will rely on a set piece? :wenger:

If you are talking about the forwards then Crespo absolutely is a player who runs onto the ball, his whole game was based around leading the line and getting goals. If there is one striker on the pitch who isn't a dribbler or someone who runs onto the ball then its Drogba.

Absolutely ridiculous that you would level that accusation at Crespo/Kluivert but not at Drogba.

Couldn't believe what I was reading, Iniesta isn't a dribbler? :lol:
 
Theon's pretty much nailed the diamond formation which is refreshing given how some managers have struggled so far to do so. I particularly like De Rossi and Gattuso's roles, perfect for those narrow midfields.

As for the back, think Nadal's getting a bit overrated here, a solid CB, saying he would pocket a colossal player like Drogba with ease is massively pushing it. His erratic positioning and tendency to get drawn out of the box could hurt them here with players like Giuly, Lampard and Drogba able to punish any space provided.
Yeah I agree with this. He was a beast but a flawed one nonetheless. Unfortunately for NM, Nadal - because of his physicality - is the one centre-half of that level who is a good match for Drogba.

He has won every single thing there is to win in football playing in systems identical to this one.

Roma - no wingers, Batigol and Delvecchio upfront with Totti in the Iniesta position - Cafu and Candela providing the width.

AC Milan - no wingers, Pirlo/Gattuso/Seedorf/Kaka midfield - Cafu and Maldini provifing the width

Brazil - no wingers, front two of Ronaldo with Rivaldo just behind, and Ronaldinho in the Iniesta position - Cafu and Roberto Carlos providing the width.
Not necessarily identical systems because Brazil and Roma (I think) played 3-4-2-1, but the point stands.
 
Not necessarily identical systems because Brazil and Roma (I think) played 3-4-2-1, but the point stands.

Yeah that is absolutely true, Roma had that three at the back and Brazil played three at the back with Lucio/R Junior/Edmilson - but yeah, as you mention the point was just that he has played the right flank all on his own, in similar if not idenetical systems :)
 
Well this one is pretty much over so may as well give my thoughts.

Theon was the worst draw for me in the entire draft. Definitely said "oh shit" when I was drawn against him. He has a solid team, but I really think not being here when it started hurt me. Not much I could do about that as I said "start it" and fell asleep.

I do feel his defense and the penetration fo his midfield is overrated, but all in all, I can't really complain. Tough draw. Shit like that happens. Add Messi (he is the first to picl), another CB or a couple of wingers and he is set.
 
Agree with you NM, worst possible draw. You have a good team but unlucky to come up against Theon.

Top effort as well mate, 3am and still posting your case.
 
It was a tough draw for NM who probably suffered from his less-than-popular Chelsea and Arsenal pairs and a couple of retrospectively under-rated Champions League stars from the 1990s in Litmanen, Popescu and Sergi.
 
Well this one is pretty much over so may as well give my thoughts.

Theon was the worst draw for me in the entire draft. Definitely said "oh shit" when I was drawn against him. He has a solid team, but I really think not being here when it started hurt me. Not much I could do about that as I said "start it" and fell asleep.

I do feel his defense and the penetration fo his midfield is overrated, but all in all, I can't really complain. Tough draw. Shit like that happens. Add Messi (he is the first to picl), another CB or a couple of wingers and he is set.

I think Fergus is going to pick first.
 
My bad. Isn't Fergus picking Ronaldinho though?
 
I'd wait until the second round of picks to pick Ronaldinho. No hurry guys.
 
I'd wait until the second round of picks to pick Ronaldinho. No hurry guys.

Haha

He would have been absolutely insane in your team, Ronaldinho on the left, Ronaldo in the right.. :drool:
 
Ah! Yeah tough to leave Messi, and also because otherwise you would have a chance to unite Messi and Iniesta and finish the game. :lol:

Who did he have on the right? I remember he found it hard to sell Aimar or Moller but can't remember who he had on the right.
 
Yeah he screwed me over there :lol:

He had Thomas Muller on the right, Villa on the left.

I dont actually think Messi on the right is better than Zidane as a number 10 or Ronaldinho on the left - all about the same level.

Messi as a striker is obviously the best but he has Batigol.
 
Oh yeah Muller. Well it's tricky really, replacing Muller would be more sensible though he's the flavour of the month right now unlike the forgotten Moller or Aimar, and then there is the fact that Zidane would be playing at his best position while Messi on the right isn't the one where he scored 70 from. Tough call to pick what would be better between Zidane feeding Batigol or Messi on the right with Batigol.