Really - why did so many of you think Mourinho was better than LVG?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well you should carry more weight around here as you have your head screwed on and know your stuff.

The OP should be banned from creating threads IMHO.
Thanks. Perhaps every thread should have a rate me button like when you can put your ratings on the team after a match. Just 2 answers like and dislike. If after lets say 50 votes its disliked more than liked its locked.
 
Don’t care for that idea at all. The lack of “likes” is one of the better features of this forum.

If a thread has no merit or is otherwise pointless, it should be locked or deleted (obviously). But the fact that X amount of random posters on here “like” it or not should be entirely irrelevant.
 
Thats a great idea.

@Damien what do you think?

It isn't. There is enough populism out there. I don't like the majority to tell me what is good to discuss and what isn't. If you don't like the thread, don't read it and don't post in it.
 
Factually speaking, Jose Mourinho isn't a better manager than LVG if we take into account the holistic aspects of football.

In terms of trophies won, LVG had 18 seasons in football Club management, won 7 titles, several domestic cup titles, reached champions league finals thrice, won 1 of them, one of the two losses were in penalties. Jose is managing his 15th season in Club management, won 1 more title (probably will never win another unless he manages somewhere like League One), but reached champions league final once less than LVG, but won both champions leagues by thoroughly playing Helenio Herrera type of super negative football, very much unlike that of Ajax in 95.

In terms of long term legacy in football, LVG trumps above Jose by miles. LVG promoted youth everywhere he was, whether that is forced by injuries or whether those players were too talented to be ignored or whether those players were discovered by others, it's a fact that, LVG promoted youth that kept serving all the clubs years after he had been fired. Yes, he may not be a genuine football *********** like Johan Cruyff and he did not revolutionize Barcelona, but he maintained the continuity of the dutch style at Barcelona when Cruyff left in 90s, LVG's role was, in that sense, crucial to Barcelona's evolution despite his failure in 2003.

Jose has never kept such legacy anywhere at any club he has been to. His managerial style in very short term only prioritizing the present moment.

In terms of failure, LVG had the worst failure at Barca in 2003, which is pretty much matched by Jose's failure at Chelsea last year. Apart from Uniao De Leiria, Porto and Inter Jose has been sacked everywhere, LVG too has been sacked everywhere except Ajax and AZ. Yes, LVG may have failed with the dutch once, but he more than made up for it in WC2014.

So, overall, LVG did not have any worse career than Jose, he is or was no worse manager than Jose. One thing is for sure proven now, both the managers are things of past (Yes, already 11pts behind after just 13 matches proves Jose cannot succeed at United). Football management is past them, both should retire now, LVG already seemed to have, I'd be glad to see the back of Jose too.

In conclusion, LVG should have been replaced by someone like Klopp, Pep Guardiola or Mauricio Pochettino, they would have never taken a U-turn from all the work LVG has done and set us back to square one, the place where Moyes left us. Mourinho is the last man in the universe, not just on earth, we should have appointed as the manager. He is only successful when the team is ready, not for a rebuilding or revival task, he has never done any revival at any club, he has only managed clubs who were on the rise, not who were on the fall.

Holy feck! :eek:
 
But that contradicts pretty much everything you just said, unless you mean they have free licence to just take pot shots with a very low percentage of actually scoring as that is really the only difference between the two schools of philosophy in the final 3rd.

Then also Henry and Messi's job and those before them Ronaldinho, Giuly's job was to drive inside to allow the full backs or I guess wingbacks as really to provide the width and that is when the system became 2143 giving them the width through the fullbacks.

No it doesn't contradict. In Henry's analysis of himself he said Pep wants to keep the width as the build up happens but when you are in the last third, you are free.

Watch the first 2 minutes of it here.



When have you heard of any of our player describing LVG giving them 'freedom'.
 
Thanks. Perhaps every thread should have a rate me button like when you can put your ratings on the team after a match. Just 2 answers like and dislike. If after lets say 50 votes its disliked more than liked its locked.
Terrible idea.
Firstly - None of the threads on this site have any bearing on anything that happens in football. Someone making a negative thread doesn't have any impact on United's (or any team's) performance. And someone making a positive thread doesn't have any impact on United's (or any team's) performance.

So what makes this thread (for example) any worse than some 'The tide is turning' thread?
People would just be disliking threads they disagree with.

If you read a title/opening post and you don't like it, then close the thread and don't re-open it. Or is the idea of this forum for everyone to be 100% on the same wave-length and to be making the same threads each re-worded in 10 different ways?
 
Holy feck! :eek:

Yeah, suffice to say I'm more than a little late to the party here, but I showed up here to basically answer the topic's question with "Because Mourinho IS better than LvG?" but then I started reading stuff like the post that you quoted and.... wow. We truly live in a weird and wacky world sometimes, eh? =D
 
Moyes,
LVG
Or
mourinho.

Please go ahead and make a choice. And then tell us all how LVG and mou is the same.
Jeez.. I can't believe I have to answer this thread. This has been a new low.
 
No it doesn't contradict. In Henry's analysis of himself he said Pep wants to keep the width as the build up happens but when you are in the last third, you are free.

Watch the first 2 minutes of it here.



When have you heard of any of our player describing LVG giving them 'freedom'.


This.

There is nothing wrong with a high possession, high pressing game, but Van Gaal's bastardized version of it was so rigid and low risk that it completely missed the point. No use in having tonnes of possession and passes when none of that happens in attacking areas. I have seen many Utd fans (me included) state that they nearly lost interest in football the last year under Van Gaal. Not winning i can handle, but that dull shite we played made every match a chore to watch.

This really tells the whole story
CSuX0pUWoAAtLk4.jpg


The results under Mouhirno have not been great, but the football on display is much, much better and if you say you prefer to watch Van Gaals United ahead of Jose's United, you are either insane or a dirty liar
 
As frustrating as the results have been I have enjoyed a lot of the football we have played this season, under LvG most games were soul destroyingly boring.
Quite, and perhaps add that enjoying watching our football is more important than winning trophies. Not that Van Gaal looked on track to win the league.
 
So, every one has to agree with your way of thinking?

I would like to see your points in factually proving Jose is better than LVG, not just on the basis of trophy counts, but also on the basis of creating legacy at football clubs. Rather than claiming I have an agenda or that I'm the worst poster (which I probably am), I would like to have a constructive debate on why Jose would be the person to have the responsibility to revive United, whereas he has no proven record of reviving any other club in the past.
I didn't say you have to agree to anything. It's just clear as day that you don't like Jose and some arguments in your post were very questionable.

Firstly, it's impossible to compare LVG with Mourinho as they are managers from 2 different eras. LVG's biggest achievements were in 90s and even though LVG has more trophies than Mourinho, he won majority of them with Ajax where the league isn't the most competitive in the world, is it? Yes, he won Champions league but Mourinho did the same with Porto.

Secondly, I heard enough of this LVG's legacy BS. I feel it's just being used to cover his failures. The state he left Bayern and us - I would never call it a legacy. Watching us last year was a torture and not only because of the results. Football we played was just unbelievably bad and I seriously thought about taking a break for a bit as I felt watching us was a complete waste of time. This year even if we don't get the results we want, I am happy with the performances. No more of this possession BS. We play direct, create chances. I am happy with that. If we continue doing it, results will come.

You also say LVG should have been replaced "by someone like Klopp, Pep Guardiola or Mauricio Pochettino as they would have never taken a U-turn from all the work LVG has done". Klopp would have taken u-turn same way Jose did as they are a complete opposite of LVG. Pochettino? Why would we want a manager who has never won anything?

I think you never liked Mourinho and it's fair enough but saying LVG is a better manager... or suggesting Mourinho should retire after 1 bad season... C'mon. LVG brainwashed our players 2 years with some stupid philosophies, rules like "don't shoot first time" and play like robots. It will take time for players to forget all this nonsense but we are already much improved team from last season. Results will come.
 
Then why did Mourinho say he wanted him at the beginning of the season? Utd were working on the deal from around february and according to reports he was keen to come. VG didnt get sacked until May and Sanches agent said VG dithered too long allowing BM to jump in. I get it your a VG fanboy but dont make stuff up. He cocked up big style there, or he knew he was going and didnt want Utd to gain from the Sanches deal.
I wouldn't say I'm a VG fan boy, he wasn't my choice to be manager but I knew what we were getting, and I take more umberance to the lack of knowledge of others and the rubbish they make up, I understand it's all opinions, mines is an opinion as well but some of them are so far off the mark it's laughable.

Also if we beleieve everything we read then there is another story that United dithered on the price as they didn't want to pay that much then Bayern simply out bid them as they agreed the fee straight away, also all the meetings Woodward had with the Benficas president in Manchester and London, so where is the truth.
He didn't block anything he didn't have the power to do that, if Woodward could make it happen then he would have, he doesn't answer to LVG.
However there is a story Woodward was keen to get the job done in January, but when you consider Sanches had only been playing for 2 months at that level you could see why LVG would slow that then.

This idea you've just put forward tho of him blocking it as he didn't want United to benefit from his signing is one of those laughable comments I'm sorry, as if you knew anything of LVG's history you'd know one of the things he regards most of his time at clubs is how he left them with a base to work from wilst unearthing gems.
 
It's pretty clear that whatever LVG was trying he'd lost the players for the most part. This was after two years. The football was awful and not suited to the PL especially when teams parked the bus.

His signings were mostly huge flops- falcao, Depay, Di Maria, Bastian, Morgan and until jose came Rojo and darmian...
Benching Ander....it just wasn't working. It was as clear as day. I think the players didn't understand or fully buy into what he was trying to do. That's 7 signings listed above that didn't improve us in any significant way . Huge investment. Terrible performances and a squad low on morale and belief in what he was trying to achieve with them.

I think LVG got very lucky that rashford and martial stepped up and somewhat saved the season. It was an absolute car crash otherwise and nobody can tell me it was all about to click or we just needed one more player etc, it was steadily getting worse as our league position showed. He'd lost the players. When a squad believes in the manager anything is possible in football so why couldn't one of the most expensively assembled squads in football history perform? It's not like you'd have to be some miracle worker to at least challenge and play good football and sometimes grind out results or get a lucky win or draw.

Everyone is so fast to try and over complicate things. We have the power to sign whatever we need every window. This team shouldn't be far away at all now if the players LVG bought in are of the requisite standard. It's the way he tried to play football that wasn't working. He didn't leave some great legacy. The only legacy he left is that fans will be more accepting of patchy results if the football is even somewhat entertaining! How's that for a legacy?
 
Last edited:
This.

There is nothing wrong with a high possession, high pressing game, but Van Gaal's bastardized version of it was so rigid and low risk that it completely missed the point. No use in having tonnes of possession and passes when none of that happens in attacking areas. I have seen many Utd fans (me included) state that they nearly lost interest in football the last year under Van Gaal. Not winning i can handle, but that dull shite we played made every match a chore to watch.

This really tells the whole story
CSuX0pUWoAAtLk4.jpg


The results under Mouhirno have not been great, but the football on display is much, much better and if you say you prefer to watch Van Gaals United ahead of Jose's United, you are either insane or a dirty liar

Can we quote this post and the picture on every page of this thread?
 
It's clear just from the football we're playing, that Mourinho is making real progress. LVG wasn't an awful manager, but he lost his touch with age, and brands became fixated with possession. A couple more transfer Windows under Mourinho and we'll be looking much more like one of the world's top teams again.
 
No it doesn't contradict. In Henry's analysis of himself he said Pep wants to keep the width as the build up happens but when you are in the last third, you are free.

Watch the first 2 minutes of it here.



When have you heard of any of our player describing LVG giving them 'freedom'.

I've never actually seen that video, but LVG's system of play there is the same. Players starting wide and driving in, that is the way Barca has always done it, LVG even mentioned he wanted Mata to be out wider to receive the ball in that wide position then drive in, that's why I think he had proper interest in Leroy Sane, a player that could do that.

Henry repeating freedom over and over again doesn't really say much tho, as what kind of freedom does he have, what does that entail? Just do whatever he wants within his zone, which would sort of go against his freedom talk.

To me LVG's ideas are the same, start wide drive in, the only thing I've heard is he said it's better to take a touch then shoot which it is but I doubt that was a mandiate.
 
Mourinho has us creating more chances. Mourinho has us winning the same amount of points as LvG and Moyes.

He is an idiot and past it.
 
What did Mourinho do wrong today? You're the idiot with that kind of logic.

We sat on a lead with 20 minutes to go. Cowardly tactics. We had them on the ropes for a good duration of that second half. But we all knew what the outcome was going to be as soon as we went defensive.

I've defended Mourinho all season. Today I can't.
 
Mourinho is a billion times better than that lunatic fraud LVG. Shit bump.
 
To answer the OP:

It's because Mourinho is better than LVG
 
Delusion is strong on this forum. I pretty much subscribe that Mourinho is a better manager than LVG but the former so far has demonstrated very little of that.

I mean what the feck are you lot arguing about?! It's literally true that Mourinho has underperformed with us so far.
 
To answer the OP simply: many of us thought and still think Mourinho is better than LVG because he is PL-proven (3 PL titles). LVG'S style simply did not work in the PL.
 
Team is playing better & more progressively. We aint getting many breaks.

We rarely played any fluent footy under LVG, just little patches of it. LVG was quite lucky though.

As it runs, atm.
 
Delusion is strong on this forum. I pretty much subscribe that Mourinho is a better manager than LVG but the former so far has demonstrated very little of that.

I mean what the feck are you lot arguing about?! It's literally true that Mourinho has underperformed with us so far.
They emotionally invested too much in Mourinho for them to admit stone cold facts that after spending alot of money we find ourselves with about the same points total as the other two failures.
 
I think we looked like LVG was in charge today. I'm starting to wonder if Mourinho is watching videos from our season with him and trying to emulate his ideas now that he's under pressure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.