The Urban Goose
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
- Messages
- 1,506
Ah, the longevity argument. Righto.Stam spent 3 seasons in the Premier League
Ah, the longevity argument. Righto.Stam spent 3 seasons in the Premier League
If we’re not allowed to pick cnuts then definitely no Liverpool players getting close to this…John Terry? Seriously? There's no case for him over (eg) Vidic, VVD, Stam, Kompany... hell, even Carvalho was the better of that defensive pairing at Chelsea. If you do want a slow, "blood and thunder traditional CB" then I give you Tony Adams, who at least wasn't an oderous, allegedly racist c**t.
Ah, the longevity argument. Righto.
Don't be obtuse.Shaw has had two world class seasons at United so far. Would you have him as a contender for the best Premier League left backs of all time?
The likes of Cole, Irwin, etc. are obviously better because they've been consistent and over a longer period of time as well. Having said that, wouldn't Shaw be in the conversation for top 10? There haven't been that many top LBs and its one of those positions where someone who shows a world class level would be in the discussion.I don't mind dismissing the longevity argument, but then every player who's had 1-3 world class seasons will have an argument for themselves.
The likes of Cole, Irwin, etc. are obviously better because they've been consistent and over a longer period of time as well. Having said that, wouldn't Shaw be in the conversation for top 10? There haven't been that many top LBs and its one of those positions where someone who shows a world class level would be in the discussion.
And? I didn't see him make many errors at Fulham.VDS went from Juventus to Fulham. Just because you didn't see it doesn't mean it didn't happen
And how does it impact VDS legacy in PL .
You don't go from Juventus to Fulham by being a great goalkeeper. Now if you're talking exclusively about PL performances, nvmAnd? I didn't see him make many errors at Fulham.
Van Dijk went from Celtic to Southampton. Does that mean he definitely made plenty of errors?
That's pretty much what the whole conversation has been about on the past few pages of this thread.You don't go from Juventus to Fulham by being a great goalkeeper. Now if you're talking exclusively about PL performances, nvm
Disagree - firstly, Irwin can lay claim to being one of the best right backs as well as left backs. This guy won it all and was adept at spot kicks and free kicks too. He's just class all around and if he was around in the 00s, he'd have more fanfare.I'd say it is. And i'm Evra's biggest fan, Irwin was fantastic - and he'd certainly get the nod over Evra. But Ashley Cole at his peak was something else. He's the only player i've ever seen that shut down peak Ronaldo and his average level was just really really high, with his peak being outstanding. There's nothing Evra could do better than Cole.
Have to wonder if you ever watched Terry much if you think he was the lesser of the Carvalho partnership. Terry was better than everyone you listed there imo, only Stam would have an argument to have been better. Blood and thunder traditional CB? Terry had immense ball playing ability off both feet, certainly more than Vidic had.John Terry? Seriously? There's no case for him over (eg) Vidic, VVD, Stam, Kompany... hell, even Carvalho was the better of that defensive pairing at Chelsea. If you do want a slow, "blood and thunder traditional CB" then I give you Tony Adams, who at least wasn't an oderous, allegedly racist c**t.
Disagree - firstly, Irwin can lay claim to being one of the best right backs as well as left backs. This guy won it all and was adept at spot kicks and free kicks too. He's just class all around and if he was around in the 00s, he'd have more fanfare.
Conversely, if Evra was around in the 90s, he would have been one of the best left wingers going. In any case, he was a lot better going forward than Cole, although I'd say Cole was defensively more sound. So, whilst I understand some people having Cole as their number one, equally, I'd understand people having Irwin or Evra there as well.
Terry was a match of the day defender, great recovery, but often out of positionHave to wonder if you ever watched Terry much if you think he was the lesser of the Carvalho partnership. Terry was better than everyone you listed there imo, only Stam would have an argument to have been better. Blood and thunder traditional CB? Terry had immense ball playing ability off both feet, certainly more than Vidic had.
Agreed. van Disney is a top, top fraud.Some crazy overrating in this thread of Liverpool players.
VvD?
Goofy cnutAgreed. van Disney is a top, top fraud.
“Denis Irwin…. Left foot, right foot, never injured, always fit, get you a goal, 7/10 minimum most weeks”Disagree - firstly, Irwin can lay claim to being one of the best right backs as well as left backs. This guy won it all and was adept at spot kicks and free kicks too. He's just class all around and if he was around in the 00s, he'd have more fanfare.
Conversely, if Evra was around in the 90s, he would have been one of the best left wingers going. In any case, he was a lot better going forward than Cole, although I'd say Cole was defensively more sound. So, whilst I understand some people having Cole as their number one, equally, I'd understand people having Irwin or Evra there as well.
Taking the mickeyGoofy cnut
He likes to duck out of many challengesTaking the mickey
Have to wonder if you ever watched Terry much if you think he was the lesser of the Carvalho partnership. Terry was better than everyone you listed there imo, only Stam would have an argument to have been better. Blood and thunder traditional CB? Terry had immense ball playing ability off both feet, certainly more than Vidic had.
Disagree - firstly, Irwin can lay claim to being one of the best right backs as well as left backs. This guy won it all and was adept at spot kicks and free kicks too. He's just class all around and if he was around in the 00s, he'd have more fanfare.
Conversely, if Evra was around in the 90s, he would have been one of the best left wingers going. In any case, he was a lot better going forward than Cole, although I'd say Cole was defensively more sound. So, whilst I understand some people having Cole as their number one, equally, I'd understand people having Irwin or Evra there as well.
He was great offensively, and that was nearly entirely under defensive coaches. The one time he played under a relatively attacking coach in Ancelotti he was incredible going forward, huge part of that team racking up the scorelines they did in 09-10.huge fan of both so i agree! Maybe i'm misremembering how good cole was offensively? I seem to recall he had an insane cross on him, but could be wrong!
I disagree I think he was immense at all aspects of the game. Like Vidic with Torres, he got done for pace once by RVP playing Vilas Boas suicidally high line and some people seem to have taken that as evidence that he was a slow coach who wouldn't survive today (I know you didn't say this, just see it on Twitter a lot). I would certainly have him in a PL all time XI though of course there are good arguments for others, namely Stam Rio and Vidic. I'd definitely have him over VVD.Terry was a match of the day defender, great recovery, but often out of position
He was great offensively, and that was nearly entirely under defensive coaches. The one time he played under a relatively attacking coach in Ancelotti he was incredible going forward, huge part of that team racking up the scorelines they did in 09-10.
I disagree I think he was immense at all aspects of the game. Like Vidic with Torres, he got done for pace once by RVP playing Vilas Boas suicidally high line and some people seem to have taken that as evidence that he was a slow coach who wouldn't survive today (I know you didn't say this, just see it on Twitter a lot). I would certainly have him in a PL all time XI though of course there are good arguments for others, namely Stam Rio and Vidic. I'd definitely have him over VVD.
And? I didn't see him make many errors at Fulham.
Van Dijk went from Celtic to Southampton. Does that mean he definitely made plenty of errors?
The very best John Terry moment was when Ronaldinho knocked him over and banged in a goal.
The very best John Terry moment was when Ronaldinho knocked him over and banged in a goal.
I don't care about opinion. I was just asking you a genuine question: WHY do you think Allison is better than VVD? I was expecting some valid reasons other than, 'eyes'.
Why are you acting so butt hurt because I have a different opinion to you? You might be surprised to know that’s something children do.
In honesty VAR would have ruled that goal out
You'd struggle to name as many VDS howlers as I could for Alisson during the 2020/21 season alone.You should have seen his howler against Arsenal. I think Reyes scored
I was going to say but they play different positions, then realisedI don't care about opinion. I was just asking you a genuine question: WHY do you think Allison is better than VVD? I was expecting some valid reasons other than, 'eyes'.
Learn to give valid reasons for your arguments. It might even get you out of being a perpetual newb.
What a truly odd bunch they really are. No Henry, No Roy Keane, No Kane. I could go on
Haha, typo on my side. I meant VDS.I was going to say but they play different positions, then realised
Stones is the most bizarre one. He doesn't even play that much. The most games he's played in a season for City was in his bad debut season. He has good runs of form every year or so but some kind of lynchpin of the City team he is not.I actually find the defenders more strange than the attackers - at least you can make a case for players like Salah - but to leave out Irwin, Terry, Kompany, Neville, Stam, Ferdinand, Terry, Adams, Vidic, Ashley Cole etc - for Stones, Robertson and TAA - now that is hilarious
He is our best defender by far, and one of the players that impacts the performances of the team the most when he is not ravaged by injuries, but he needs several more great seasons to even be a honorable mention on a best of all time list/team.Stones is the most bizarre one. He doesn't even play that much. The most games he's played in a season for City was in his bad debut season. He has good runs of form every year or so but some kind of lynchpin of the City team he is not.