RAWK Goes Into Meltdown 2016-17 Edition

Looks like the RAWK Mod has really banned that poster :lol:

Ban for what? Did I say anything wrong or end up offending anyone?

If you ban me, you get your wish but I won't get mine as I would not be able to post. Not the best solution!
grin.gif
Click to expand...

Another RAWK Poster said:
I'm getting the word...........nonce!
Click to expand...

Mod said:
Let me be completely explicit. You are derailing this topic. I have asked you to leave. If you do not leave this topic I will remove your ability to post. I would rather than you
stopped voluntarily, but if you don't you will be stopped.

For the last couple of pages this has been about you, not the new signing. That will stop.
Click to expand...
My posts have been about Wijnaldum's signing and nowhere i have mentioned & discussed myself unless some poster decided link my identity to some other poster. I wish I could be signed by Liverpool to play football & I can discuss myself as a football player.
tongue.gif
Probably I have not said the things you fancy to read, hence you are threatening to ban me and that's fair enough. I would try to shower endless praise to any signing from now on, irrespective of what i think about the player.

I bow down to your powers and would stop posting on this thread now.
Click to expand...

Mod said:
Goodbye.
Click to expand...
 
Why are the RAWK mods so banhammer-happy? I really don't understand why criticising the club's players is a ban-worthy offence when it's not here, or any other forums (except Bluemoon, where you'd just be called a rag for criticising a City player).
 
Bet Godin and Boateng are glad they can't be embarrassed by that strike force next season.
 
What are they seeing when viewing that list? Looks as bad as its been for years for them
 
We should have some kind of RAWK rescue and intervention program and invite the seemingly sensible posters from RAWK (in other words, the guys that is banned most often) to the Caf.

Getting them out of that cesspool is nearly humanitarian aid.
 
KomodoBadger said:
Why are the RAWK mods so banhammer-happy? I really don't understand why criticising the club's players is a ban-worthy offence when it's not here, or any other forums (except Bluemoon, where you'd just be called a rag for criticising a City player).
Click to expand...

It's how you end up with a site like RAWK, though. Kind of a chicken and egg situation.
 
Irrational. said:
Not sure if this is fake, but a photo of the Liverpool team accommodation requirements have been leaked online:

13770505_1081561708547390_5576831868747842871_n.jpg

Henderson and Lallana to have bedrooms next to each other :lol:

Oh, and Kloppo is a smoker, apparently.
Click to expand...


Also, why does Coutinho need a scouser in his bedroom?
 
Whoever questions a player or God forbid Klopp gets banned. :lol:

Completely crazy.
 
KomodoBadger said:
Why are the RAWK mods so banhammer-happy? I really don't understand why criticising the club's players is a ban-worthy offence when it's not here, or any other forums (except Bluemoon, where you'd just be called a rag for criticising a City player).
Click to expand...
Because if they allow people with different opinions to take part in discussions, it threatens their echo chamber where Liverpool FC is brilliant in every way.
 
kenny19 said:
So many United fans have infiltrated their ranks that posting in their United thread isn't fun anymore for them:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:.

They think they can just create a United thread and post absolute shite and nobody will object.

Long may it continue!
Click to expand...
Was kenny19 a Pool fan anyhow?
 
The wankfest over these twats and their signings is almost as embarrassing as last year. They are average as feck.
Click to expand...

For the 3rd time in 3 years, they have failed to address the main issue, and that is appointing the right successor for Ferguson. No matter how much they spend on random expensive players, that won't solve their problems. They don't have a plan in place, and they are quickly losing their identity. It is funny, because managers like Klopp, Guardiola, Ancelotti, Conte and Emery have changed clubs recently, and Manchester United have ended up with Mourinho.
Click to expand...

Bunch of yesterday's men. feck these.
Click to expand...

I'm going to fully enjoy the upcoming Mourinho@Utd laugh-a-thon. Signs are it'll be his best season yet.
Click to expand...
 
Part #2 of this might be a WUM I suppose

But the utd teams of old had the extreme brutality of Roy Keane.
Click to expand...

And we have Emre Can, who may not be at the level of Keane yet, but will surpass him in the not to distant future.
Click to expand...
 
RAWK 1 said:
hahaha!

To be fair though United did use money earned through the club to reinvest in better players. I still think it's buying the league giving the magnitude of the investment but what else might United do with the excess funds?
Click to expand...

RAWK 2 said:
Well, the do have a massive debt of over £400 millon.
Click to expand...

Seems like the exaggerating of numbers doesn't end at transfer fees
 
The redcafe folks are so sure that Liverpool is going to flop big time this term.
It is a bit funny. Looking forward to seeing their 200 million signings.
Click to expand...

Don't be fooled by their talk. They know what is going on at Liverpool. They've seen it under Ferguson.
Click to expand...

Didn't they usually say that Fergie was lucky and bought the league?
 
baanke laal said:
Looks like the RAWK Mod has really banned that poster :lol:
Click to expand...

Two possibilities:

1) RAWK mods are a bunch of (former) pimpled faced geeks who are just taking their revenge on the world or

2) They are just paranoid that its has been infiltrated by United fans wumming.

Or both.
 
Godfather said:
How come Can is so highly regarded amongst them? Imho he is fecking shit
Click to expand...

No wonder your opinions are humble if this is typical of them.

I hardly ever look on RAWK, but when I do most of the hyperbole seems ironic in intent.
 
SteveJ said:
Fight the power:
Click to expand...

We had a Betamax - much better than that other crap.
Click to expand...

A classic allertonism, that.

There was very little difference between Beta and VHS in terms of picture quality - whatever edge the former had initially didn't last with the introduction of new modes. I quote:

When Betamax was introduced in Japan and the United States in 1975, its Beta I speed of 1.57 inches per second (ips) offered a slightly higher horizontal resolution (250 lines vs 240 lines horizontal NTSC), lower video noise, and less luma/chroma crosstalk than VHS, and was later marketed as providing pictures superior to VHS's playback. However the introduction of Beta II speed, 0.79 ips (two-hour mode), to compete with VHS' two-hour Standard Play mode (1.31 ips) reduced Betamax's horizontal resolution to 240 lines. The extension of VHS to VHS HQ increased the apparent resolution to 250 lines so that overall a Betamax/VHS user could expect virtually identical luma resolution and chroma resolution (≈30 lines) wherein the actual picture performance depended on other factors including the condition and quality of the videotape and the specific video recorder machine model. For most consumers the difference as seen on the average television of the time was negligible.
Click to expand...

One may - of course - speculate that Andy's family were not like "most consumers", and possessed a superior machine (a de luxe Beta player, so to speak), a possibility he would no doubt confirm if given the chance.
 
Chesterlestreet said:
A classic allertonism, that.

There was very little difference between Beta and VHS in terms of picture quality - whatever edge the former had initially didn't last with the introduction of new modes. I quote:



One may - of course - speculate that Andy's family were not like "most consumers", and possessed a superior machine (a de luxe Beta player, so to speak), a possibility he would no doubt confirm if given the chance.
Click to expand...

Pwnd.
 
Godfather said:
How come Can is so highly regarded amongst them? Imho he is fecking shit
Click to expand...
Because this way they can state they have world class talents in their squad when in reality they've got dross. Ibe, Lucas, Sakho, Emre Can, Babel, Le Tallec are prime examples of this phenomenon and there are many more. They're called deluded for a reason.
 
That lineup below that WUM poster 'thisisouryear' is the worst line up in history.

I'd absolutely love to face a side that has a two man MF of Wijnaldum and Can ffs :lol:.

Sturridge

Firmino - Coutinho - Mane

Wijnaldum - Can
​
They're literally wanking over that?
 
VanGaalEra said:
That lineup below that WUM poster 'thisisouryear' is the worst line up in history.

I'd absolutely love to face a side that has a two man MF of Wijnaldum and Can ffs :lol:.

Sturridge

Firmino - Coutinho - Mane

Wijnaldum - Can
​
They're literally wanking over that?
Click to expand...
My granddad could defeat that side.
 
VanGaalEra said:
That lineup below that WUM poster 'thisisouryear' is the worst line up in history.

I'd absolutely love to face a side that has a two man MF of Wijnaldum and Can ffs :lol:.

Sturridge

Firmino - Coutinho - Mane

Wijnaldum - Can
​
They're literally wanking over that?
Click to expand...
You would have low standards for our team if all we had won in 10 years was a league cup final v a Championship team on penalties.
 
Tbf, Can is a decent player. He's not colossal they make him out to be.

Same with Sakho, they make him out to be a colossal and we say he's shit, truth is he's in the middle somewhere.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.