RAWK Goes into Meltdown 2014/2015 - The "We go again" Edition

To be fair, how Benitez is doing now with Napoli is irrelevant to how good Liverpool were when he managed them.

It's still laughable of course, the idea they were feared in Europe at all, let alone more than other teams.
 
The Mancs started coming on strong from about 07 (though Milan humiliated them that year). Ferguson took tips from Benitez and Mourinho and changed his set up in Europe around that time.

Did SAF really took tips from them?
 
Its a renowned fact that SAF would have never won anything without Rafa
 
Putting aside the feeling that this guy is on a WUM, if he was real, why shouldn't he be in his 70s? There are lots of old people who use the Internet you know, silver surfers and all that, there's people on here who've been watching United that long. Not many, but they exist.
Absolutely. I think he has nothing to do with United, except being the Liverpool-dream of a United-supporter, but otherwise the internet is great for old people. No more old-age solitude. Without the internet I'd be a lonely old man with nothing in life to enjoy. Half of you wouldn't even look at me in the real world, let alone speak to me. Yet on here...well half of you still don't look at me and don't reply to my fascinating posts full of depth and insight, but at least I feel like part of a big picture.
 
Did SAF really took tips from them?
I think that poster might be referring to how we shifted to 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3 about that time. I don't think it's a Rafa thing, though - 4-2-3-1 was in vogue at the time anyway - but we had a certain Portuguese "winger" who was scoring buckets and it would have been a waste to accommodate him as a pure winger. We also had Fletcher, Carrick and Scholes all fit and in-form, so 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 hybrid was a natural solution to all our problems. The addition of Tévez gave us a fully-interchangeable front line - something Rafa never did (and never would have, with his extra-cautious approach).
 
Absolutely. I think he has nothing to do with United, except being the Liverpool-dream of a United-supporter, but otherwise the internet is great for old people. No more old-age solitude. Without the internet I'd be a lonely old man with nothing in life to enjoy. Half of you wouldn't even look at me in the real world, let alone speak to me. Yet on here...well half of you still don't look at me and don't reply to my fascinating posts full of depth and insight, but at least I feel like part of a big picture.

Quoted so you don't feel lonely & useless any more :)
 
brendan.gif
This is possibly the greatest gif I've ever seen.
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
I have to agree and must give great credit to whomever came up with this piece of genius. Has to be on every page.
tumblr_m6odkq8jNo1qbolbn.gif
 
Absolutely. I think he has nothing to do with United, except being the Liverpool-dream of a United-supporter, but otherwise the internet is great for old people. No more old-age solitude. Without the internet I'd be a lonely old man with nothing in life to enjoy. Half of you wouldn't even look at me in the real world, let alone speak to me. Yet on here...well half of you still don't look at me and don't reply to my fascinating posts full of depth and insight, but at least I feel like part of a big picture.
I would look at you because I have a kind of pervy infatuation with old people.
 
Red and white kop

Red And White Kop

Red and White Kop

Rafa And Weird Klan

Ridiculously annoying waster know-it-alls

Rafa Always Won Kups

Respect Among Wanker Kleptomaniacs.

Racists And Whites Klan

Rafa: A Waiter White Knight

Remembering Almost Winning Krap.

Rodgers Always Wanted Kenny

Racists, Arseholes, Wankers and Kunts.

Retarded & Anachronistic Wanker Kunts

Wow, thanks guys. And all the many others who replied...
 
Ok, he may not have won any Premier League medals BUT has any footballer ever had a smaller forehead than Stevie G? No.
 
the sterling thread has gone bonkers, lol
So Sterling is as good as Gotze, Coutinho is as good as Iniesta, Sturridge is better than Mandzukic, Moreno is growing in to the next Jordi Alba, Can is looking more like Schweinsteiger every day, Henderson covers more ground than any other midfielder ever, Sakho is better than Varane, Lallana has the poise on the ball of Zidane, and Mignolet is a world class shot stopper.

Remind me why we are 5th again?

Remind me why Basle and Beşiktaş had comfortable European wins against us?

Cos I'm pretty sure it's not just down to Joe Allen

Probably the most sensible post I've ever seen on RAWK.
 
Who does the RAWK Meltdown Twitter feed? Is that someone from here?
 
I wasn't alive when Liverpools demise started with Souness etc but I still don't understand how they fell behind so fast. Surely after all that 70s and 80s success they would have had plenty of money to spend on star players? Like from what I've read is that Alan Shearer rejected United for Blackburn but why weren't Liverpool after him as well?

They seemed to have some good young players too in Fowler and McManaman + some others that I've forgotten about. It must have taken staggering amounts of mismanagement to have fallen behind like that.

Does anyone remember when Liverpool fans started to get worried about the future of the club and the direction it was going? 2-3 years after no league title...5-7 years?

Makes you shudder at the thought of us giving Moyes more time and going through the same thing.
 
Liverpool's demise started when the backpass law was changed. They found it difficult to bore teams into submission after that.
 
Is that Cantona guy also a poster on the CAF?

If you're going to choose one internet forum, I have no idea why it would be RAWK as an opposition supporter.
 
Reading how Phil Thompson got sacked is pretty funny. He bitched about Souness to Brian Kidd. Who told Fergie, who told Archie Knox, who told Walter Smith who told Souness.
 
I wasn't alive when Liverpools demise started with Souness etc but I still don't understand how they fell behind so fast. Surely after all that 70s and 80s success they would have had plenty of money to spend on star players? Like from what I've read is that Alan Shearer rejected United for Blackburn but why weren't Liverpool after him as well?

They seemed to have some good young players too in Fowler and McManaman + some others that I've forgotten about. It must have taken staggering amounts of mismanagement to have fallen behind like that.

Does anyone remember when Liverpool fans started to get worried about the future of the club and the direction it was going? 2-3 years after no league title...5-7 years?

Makes you shudder at the thought of us giving Moyes more time and going through the same thing.

I think it's very easy to forget that the foundation of United's success began with Fergie and the class of '92. Imagine in the 90's if we'd have gone through 7-8 poor managers and had to spend big money on 5-6 extra player's that didn't come through our youth system and then re-invested because the next manager didn't rate some of the previous managers purchases, it would have had a detrimental effect on everything. All the money that went into increasing the capacity of the stadium, modernising aspects of the club and facilities and buying a few great player's would have probably have gone on constantly trying to keep up with other clubs.

It is a lot easier to stay on top than to try and claw your way back on top; just look at our spending over the last 18 months if you need proof of that. Fergie kept us on top competing with teams who over the years have thrown a lot more money at transfers (Liverpool, Chelsea, City).

It's a difficult one for Liverpool as in hindsight in the late 80's/early 90's they should have built a new 70,000 seater modern stadium and concentrated on long terms investments, rather than short term ones. However at the time I'm sure they thought: "we throw money at the problem, get back on top and then we can focus on our long term strategy". Their short term priorities were never met, which meant their long term priorities were perpetually shelved.
 
We had Cantona, they had Oyvind Leonhardsen. Our young players trained with the likes of Hughes, Bruce and Robson. Theirs turned up at an FA Cup final in beige suits. We had Fergie, they had Roy Evans AND Gérard Houllier at the same time. We had Karl Poborsky. They had Patrick Berger. OK forget the last one.
 
Liverpool are not going to get far if they keep building their teams around a single player. Replacing Suarez is almost impossible, there was no way they could have done it.. Should have been planning for his exit a season earlier, and trying to bring in players that fit into their style of play rather than throwing money at 3-4 players, hoping at least one of them can have an impact like Suarez did. It seems like everyone except those at Liverpool knew Suarez was going to leave, it was sure to happen.

Fergie never built his team revolving on one player, that's why we've lasted so long.. It helped that we had Neville, Giggs, Scholes stay for so long but we've had other big names come and go, but each time we had someone ready to step up. We weren't throwing 18-19 year old players in the deep, expecting them to carry a team through the entire season, Liverpool lack that at the moment. They should stop focusing on next season and instead be planning for where they want to finish 2 or 3 seasons from now and build a team focusing on that. I know it's easier said than done but their lack of foresight is still their biggest problem
 
@finneh Yeah the stadium is definitely somewhere that Liverpool have been left behind. You can just at Arsenal now and see the benefits of building a new massive stadium and the effects it has on revenue.

The whole Stanley park stuff was a mess and I think they actually managed to lose 60m on the project with nothing to show for it. I think the new owners are planning to upgrade Anfield into a 55k stadium now though but it still seems small considering the size of the club.
 
hearing Flanagan hasn't refused to sign a new contract, rather he cannot sign a new contract. as in write his own name in ink
 
Our rise with Ferguson in the early 90's came about at pretty much the perfect time. This is when the money being injected into the game was starting to be taken to the next level as well. We was basically a sleeping giant, I don't think there was anything Liverpool could do to prevent themselves being dethroned at that point.
 
@finneh Yeah the stadium is definitely somewhere that Liverpool have been left behind. You can just at Arsenal now and see the benefits of building a new massive stadium and the effects it has on revenue.

The whole Stanley park stuff was a mess and I think they actually managed to lose 60m on the project with nothing to show for it. I think the new owners are planning to upgrade Anfield into a 55k stadium now though but it still seems small considering the size of the club.

For Liverpool the difference is more than qualifying for the Champions League each year. The difference is around £55m each season nowadays, which even with price increases and inflation etc you'll be looking at around £600-700m in the last 25 years.

Sometimes it's better to take the short term pain of a mortgage and the interest that goes with, along with the short term cash flow problems for the long term benefits. As you say Arsenal are a shining example of that; but again even that has taken Wenger's genius to essentially spend no money on transfers for a decade, whilst keeping them in the Champions League.

If Liverpool had gotten a Fergie or a Wenger they'd probably be where Arsenal are right now; mind you they'd have probably sacked either of them 3-4 seasons in for not meeting expectations.