Feedingseagulls
Full Member
And scousers bringing hilarious inflatable aeroplanes to Old Trafford.
I think it was the liverpool fans and echo that first started making Always the Victim chant about Hillsborough, It was always about Suarez but ironically they went to their victims complex and made us to be the bad guys.Completely agree. I also don't believe people who say that 'always the victim' gets sunn on an another context. Maybe that was the case before, but once the relation with Hillsbrough was made, it is song about that. Which is disgusting.
It was still in bad taste. The allusion is there, even if it's unintentional.I think it was the liverpool fans and echo that first started making Always the Victim chant about Hillsborough, It was always about Suarez but ironically they went to their victims complex and made us to be the bad guys.
Completely agree. I also don't believe people who say that 'always the victim' gets sunn on an another context. Maybe that was the case before, but once the relation with Hillsbrough was made, it is song about that. Which is disgusting.
And let's face it. 'Without killing anyone, we won it 3 times' is clearly about Europe and Heysel. Yet Scousers go all Hillsborough over it.
Jesus, just saw that Barney lad called Skrtel a 'hero' in the match day thread for his stamp on De Gea. Pathetic.
Permabanned.Has he been banned for this (Barney not Skrtel!)?
Any song referencing Heysel is in bad taste, however you want to dress it up. It wouldn't take a genius to work out that the reason they get sung is to wind up Liverpool fans, far more so than because of any investment in the tragedy.
Both sides need to pack it in though.
Permabanned.
Do they?And let's face it. 'Without killing anyone, we won it 3 times' is clearly about Europe and Heysel. Yet Scousers go all Hillsborough over it.
The relationship with Hillsborough was fabricated by Scousers to further enhance the 'always the victim'. That said, as you say once they had won the PR on that, we should have stopped singing it. Though, it is very hard for the Scousers to suggest in the Suarez case that it was sung with any other intention that to ridicule Suarez and Liverpool's pathetic stance.Completely agree. I also don't believe people who say that 'always the victim' gets sunn on an another context. Maybe that was the case before, but once the relation with Hillsbrough was made, it is song about that. Which is disgusting.
All Man Utd deserved from that is a 1 way ticket to Munich piloted by a dodgy pilot... never have any respect for dirty manc cnuts... if you support utd then 99% of u was blatantly brought up and surrounded by a scummy family.. just saying
Nice, classy.I'm quoting my cousin's Facebook post yesterday for this one.
"just saying"I'm quoting my cousin's Facebook post yesterday for this one.
Songs about dead people, irrespective of the context are pretty low and there were several sung yesterday.
Redmen TV do a video after every game giving their opinion on who their best and worst player was, after yesterdays game they gave the best player to (Can or Allen, who I thought were both useless).
But best of all they gave their worst player of the match to the referee
Great stuff, some of his comments were just to provoke anyway.
Can was awful and according to a liverpool supporting friend, he thought Allen was their worst player.I thought Can was bloody awful and didn't even realise Allen was on the pitch. Typical that they're blaming the ref though.
To be fair, had he been booked, he'd have ran 30 yards to the ref, dropkicked him in the face and got sent off. Then, in equal numbers, Liverpool would have gone on to score 10 win the game, and be announced World Cup champions.Can was awful and according to a liverpool supporting friend, he thought Allen was their worst player.
They made a big deal out of the ref not booking di Maria, the ref made the right decision, it was an accident, albeit stupid but he wasn't trying to gain an advantage, and even if the ref did book him, it wasn't gonna affect the game!
Was it really deliberate and seeking to gain an advantage?="Bwuk, post: 17274062, member: 64875"]To be fair, di Maria should of been booked for that. Stupid moment.
I think we'll finish fourth on goal difference but equal on points with third placed Arsenal, which is brilliant after our slow start to the season. I also think we'll take this form into next season and we will challenge for the title, especially if we do well with transfers in the summer.
That sounds like a smashing idea. We could get a dedicated team of newbs with access to this thread, and they get a points in return.This thread needs more RAWK quotes!
Can a newbie or two be promoted on the condition they become our RAWK quote monkeys?
I think we'll finish fourth on goal difference but equal on points with third placed Arsenal, which is brilliant after our slow start to the season. I also think we'll take this form into next season and we will challenge for the title, especially if we do well with transfers in the summer.
I'm in tears of laughter at work from this.I think that I'll beat Mo Farah to the gold medal at the next Olympics, which is brilliant since I can only manage 10k at the most and my times are very slow. I also think that I'll take the confidence from that success and win the lottery five weeks in a row, especially if I buy a ticket.
I'm in tears of laughter at work from this.
Re: FT: LFC 1-2 MUFC
« Reply #1994 on: Today at 03:29:18 PM »
I know a Saffer who flew himself and family in from Jhb to watch Steven Gerrard play his last game as Captain against Man Utd....
I think we'll finish fourth on goal difference but equal on points with third placed Arsenal, which is brilliant after our slow start to the season. I also think we'll take this form into next season and we will challenge for the title, especially if we do well with transfers in the summer.
That sounds like a smashing idea. We could get a dedicated team of newbs with access to this thread, and they get a points in return.