Rams is not trying to justify it. What he's saying is that the doping issue is blown out of proportion by the people who say they've lost interest because of it. Cycling has always been about doping. Anyone who doesn't know this doesn't know cycling. Nevertheless, I reckon the majority of winners have been clean - or at least, didn't derive a great deal of advantage from doping.
I still enjoy cycling, but probably to a lesser and lesser degree. All of my previous favourites are gone. I will never accept that the sport and doping go hand in hand, don`t care if it`s been like that for a long time. I honestly think that most winners post 1990 have been drugged. Not only the winners of course, but the sport has just been full of it. And of course it gives you and advantage, don`t be naive. No rider would take the career-ending risk of doping if there wasn`t a fat advantage at the end of the rainbow.
Don't know much about skiing. However, if you look at what Landis took - testosterone - and what he did - basically charge out at the beginning of the stage and sprint up and down 4 mountains - then you'll know that he didn't derive any physical advantage from it at all. Testosterone doesn't actually improve your stamina in the race. Its purpose is to enable you to build muscle before the race. And whether or not Landis took it doesn't change the fact that it was an incredible ride. Could someone else have done it with the same dope? Probably not - but you will think this only if you know Landis's history and what kind of rider he is.
In international sports at top level the differances are small. Doping will enhance your performance that extra notch you`ll need. Landis was tough as hell and was a special rider and person, defo the kind of rider that could have won a stage like that from time till time. He was however on drugs, maybe not stamima enhancing but performance enhancing nonetheless. Won`t adreanalin give your muscles some extra juice? I guess that would come in handy.
It doesn't matter to the overall standings of the race. If Vino had been in contention, I doubt he would have been allowed to win Stage 15. Go back and watch it again - you'll see that Contador and Rasmussen were more interested in trying to get each other to crack, rather than worry about Vino.