Ah man maybe he doesn't even exist? It would be classic United to have fallen for a scam like this.
A striker called "Hojlund".... so obvious in retrospect.
Absolutely, no airport pictures, no bye bye ig videos, no spotted in Carrington. I give this thread a 1.5 / 5 muppetsWhat? No flight tracker?! You all are getting old, grumpy and lazy.
He will probably play 15 mins for us until people start comparing him to Nunez.
Or Haaland if he'd manage to score a goal or two in his first match. It can go both ways imo. Let's see how the lad does here. I'm excited but skeptical at the same time. Anything is possible.He will probably play 15 mins for us until people start comparing him to Nunez.
I would argue that Ibrahimovic, Ronaldo, Cavani, Salah and Haaland were all pretty good as well.The only elite strikers that have been in the PL in the last 10 seasons or so are Kane, Aguero, Suarez and Costa.
Van Persie?I would argue that Ibrahimovic, Ronaldo, Cavani, Salah and Haaland were all pretty good as well.
I would argue that Ibrahimovic, Ronaldo, Cavani, Salah and Haaland were all pretty good as well.
Excellent post.What's there to be baffled at? He's an elite CF prospect. Top CF prospects are very rare. Bayern are signing a 30 year old after they went a year without a striker because their mid 30s striker left to go to Barca. Madrid lost their mid 30s striker and are using a striker less formation now, waiting to sign Mbappe who is a wide forward anyway. City have Haaland who along with Osimhen are literally the only under 30 year old strikers who are ready for top teams. Before getting Haaland, City went a year without a striker too. Liverpool don't really have a striker, just a bunch of wide forwards. Arsenal have Jesus who is a CF and works hard but doesn't score much.
The CF market is shit is what it is. Football stopped developing strikers so when you get the chance to sign a top prospect, you simply pay up if you want him.
You have Haaland, Kane, Lewandowski, Osimhen, Benzema who are the top level strikers currently. 3 of them are 30+, 1 is at City and the other is getting quoted at 150m+, and was bought by Napoli before he did much for 70m anyway.
You have a bunch of wide forwards who teams try to adapt to make do at CF, to varying degrees, like Jota/Gakpo, Isak, Kolo Muani, even Mbappe, who aren't proper #9's and don't really do that hold up play and being a focal point (or to varying levels).
You have mid tier players like Lautaro, Vlahović, Toney, Ramos, Watkins, Mitrovic who are being quoted absurd fees without having top level potential, so you would pay elite level prices for Europa League production out of them as their ceiling.
Then you have a few youngsters with big potential, like Hojlund and Sesko. And of them, Hojlund is the one of the very few on this entire list who is a proper #9 with all the tools to be a top center forward. Think of it like paying to get a CF in the mold of Dzeko, Lewandowski, Ibra, Kane, Drogba, Cavani, etc at the age of 20. None of these guys did anything at that age, most broke out at 22/23 (Kane at 21). The second these guys break through, they are over 100m and pretty much unobtainable if you didn't get them beforehand (unless you are Haaland who puts a clause in). It's securing a rare profile, elite talent that we happen to be in dire need of as well, and a player who may not be all that far away from stepping up either.
As for who starts... Martial doesn't have the pace or strength or movement in the box that Hojlund has, despite the age. Yeah Martial will get his gametime when fit which is good. Hojlund is barely 20. By the time Martials contract is out, Hojlund might just be ready to be the full time guy. He gives us that threat in behind that only Rashford offers in our squad, he gives us proper #9 movement in the box, he gives us a focal point.
Drogba?I would argue that Ibrahimovic, Ronaldo, Cavani, Salah and Haaland were all pretty good as well.
Media's starting to stir things up before the kid even has his medical, forget 15mins into his first match:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/foot...nhag-manutd-transfer-hojlund-medical-30600175
Ahh how could I forget Haaland. Ibra, Cavani and Ronaldo were not elite in the PL. Very good still but not elite.I would argue that Ibrahimovic, Ronaldo, Cavani, Salah and Haaland were all pretty good as well.
I am hoping for 20 goals in all competitions. Not that bothered with “EPL goals” number - we play in 4 competitions, and total tally is more important in my viewIm hoping he gets 10-15 EPL goals this season. Would be very happy with such return
Forgot about Alvarez but yeah city found a good one there. But it was a random punt from south america who ended up hitting gold. Barcelona trying it with Vitor Roque. We definitely need to hit that market more.Disagree entirely that the Striker market is poor.
There's an abundance of talent out there and young talent too many of whom are obtainable.
The difference is EtH wants a certain player which you have alluded too which diminishes the pool of talent United can go for.
As for City, they went a season without a striker because they were getting Haaland, they now have two out and out strikers.
Liverpool have never really played with a number 9 under Klopp, so have no need for one.
Newcastle have Wilson, Chelsea brought Lukaku, now Jackson, have Broja,
Brighton have Ferguson,
As for starting, Sancho will go into the start of the season as a false 9, Rasmus will only start I guess when EtH feels he is integrated into the team.
When Martial is fit, I presume he will start ahead of him.
Apparently everyone is utter crap until proven otherwise.
His middle name is Winther, it has to be done.
I've ruffled a few feathers by saying this too but I think you're right.When Martial is fit, I presume he will start ahead of him.
I haven't watched him play.. Just youtube videos.. But apparently he can do 100M in 11 secs.. So him and Rashford should be electric..I've ruffled a few feathers by saying this too but I think you're right.
What's there to be baffled at? He's an elite CF prospect. Top CF prospects are very rare. Bayern are signing a 30 year old after they went a year without a striker because their mid 30s striker left to go to Barca. Madrid lost their mid 30s striker and are using a striker less formation now, waiting to sign Mbappe who is a wide forward anyway. City have Haaland who along with Osimhen are literally the only under 30 year old strikers who are ready for top teams. Before getting Haaland, City went a year without a striker too. Liverpool don't really have a striker, just a bunch of wide forwards. Arsenal have Jesus who is a CF and works hard but doesn't score much.
The CF market is shit is what it is. Football stopped developing strikers so when you get the chance to sign a top prospect, you simply pay up if you want him.
You have Haaland, Kane, Lewandowski, Osimhen, Benzema who are the top level strikers currently. 3 of them are 30+, 1 is at City and the other is getting quoted at 150m+, and was bought by Napoli before he did much for 70m anyway.
You have a bunch of wide forwards who teams try to adapt to make do at CF, to varying degrees, like Jota/Gakpo, Isak, Kolo Muani, even Mbappe, who aren't proper #9's and don't really do that hold up play and being a focal point (or to varying levels).
You have mid tier players like Lautaro, Vlahović, Toney, Ramos, Watkins, Mitrovic who are being quoted absurd fees without having top level potential, so you would pay elite level prices for Europa League production out of them as their ceiling.
Then you have a few youngsters with big potential, like Hojlund and Sesko. And of them, Hojlund is the one of the very few on this entire list who is a proper #9 with all the tools to be a top center forward. Think of it like paying to get a CF in the mold of Dzeko, Lewandowski, Ibra, Kane, Drogba, Cavani, etc at the age of 20. None of these guys did anything at that age, most broke out at 22/23 (Kane at 21). The second these guys break through, they are over 100m and pretty much unobtainable if you didn't get them beforehand (unless you are Haaland who puts a clause in). It's securing a rare profile, elite talent that we happen to be in dire need of as well, and a player who may not be all that far away from stepping up either.
As for who starts... Martial doesn't have the pace or strength or movement in the box that Hojlund has, despite the age. Yeah Martial will get his gametime when fit which is good. Hojlund is barely 20. By the time Martials contract is out, Hojlund might just be ready to be the full time guy. He gives us that threat in behind that only Rashford offers in our squad, he gives us proper #9 movement in the box, he gives us a focal point.
Saw this on reddit, which I thought was a good perspective to look at the fee with.
I mean is this even that controversial an opinion? If and this is a massively big if, Martial is fit(and not just fit to kick a ball but fit to play and actually run. Not the version we had toward the end of last season who couldn't really run but the version at the start of Ten Hag's tenure) he'll start, there is no doubt about it.I've ruffled a few feathers by saying this too but I think you're right.
Martial will play less than 20 games for United from this point until he leaves. There’s no way he starts any game that is a ‘must win’ so probably cup matches or bottom sides.When Martial is fit, I presume he will start ahead of him.
When Martial is fit, I presume he will start ahead of him.