Rasmus Højlund | Signed for United

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's getting to silly numbers. I worry from what I've seen of him. Kane is an infinitely better option if there's any way we can get him for 80-90m.

The price is steep but we are not getting Kane for a reasonable fee unless he goes on strike and he won't go on strike. So it's a moot point.
 
It's getting to silly numbers. I worry from what I've seen of him. Kane is an infinitely better option if there's any way we can get him for 80-90m.
There's no way Levy will sell to us for that figure.
 
wish they would make a decision

Yeah what we are doing is nonsensical.

Like just make a decision. Keep loan or sell. There's only 3 options and it's been well over half a year since the case closed.

Looks a bit amerturish that we still don't know what we are going to do
 
I’m backing Ten Hag on this one.

Kane would be great but would be past his best in 2/3 years anyway.

This seems to fit more in with the longer term vision and while there might not be an immediate impact hopefully it pays dividends in the long term.
 
It's getting to silly numbers. I worry from what I've seen of him. Kane is an infinitely better option if there's any way we can get him for 80-90m.

You have to look at the total cost during the contract, and Kane’s wages would be massivly higher
 
I was listening to a podcast. In this, they asked the question: How many goals should Højlund score before he would be considered a succes in United?

For me, it would be something like 12-15 goals - and showing he is progressing. Between 8-12 goals would be okay as long as it seems he is on the right track. Below that would be problematic.

What is your take?
Same. PL is step up, if he scores around 8-12 goals in his first season it is fine. He brings more than just goals.
 
If the lad is decent, has a good attitude, and can stay fit, then with the state of strikers in the modern game he'll be worth every penny of £60m. He could be with us for 10 years+ and at this point any reliable striker option who isn't an absolute donkey / appalling prick has got to be valuable to us, even if he never makes the grade as our long term first choice.
 
I'm not sure what to think... on the one hand you have the caf experts who worry that their friends who support rival clubs will banter with them on Whatsapp if we pay 60 million and he doesn't score loads, and on the other, you have the best manager we've had since Ferguson retired who thinks this lad is the one he needs and presumably an analytics team who have done a proper check of the data and agreed.
 
There's no way Levy will sell to us for that figure.
He's under instruction to sell from the owner though? If Spurs want money for him and he rejects Bayern move - which I expect he will, then Kane is an option. I think that would be the figure for a player turning 30 this season with 1 year on his contract.
 
Don’t understand why some would rather sign Kane who is old and will cost about 5 times as much.
 
It's getting to silly numbers. I worry from what I've seen of him. Kane is an infinitely better option if there's any way we can get him for 80-90m.

Kane would cost £120m minimum, with an astronomical salary. Plus he has no resale value either.
 
You have to look at the total cost during the contract, and Kane’s wages would be massivly higher
We have freed up a lot of wages in the past year. Ronaldo, Cavani, DDG. The're would be wage budget and Kane makes us title contenders. I'm just not convinced by Hojlund, especially not for a huge fee.
 
I'm not sure what to think... on the one hand you have the caf experts who worry that their friends who support rival clubs will banter with them on Whatsapp if we pay 60 million and he doesn't score loads, and on the other, you have the best manager we've had since Ferguson retired who thinks this lad is the one he needs and presumably an analytics team who have done a proper check of the data and agreed.

:lol:
 
I see his situation similar to Osimhen when he moved from Lille. Hojlund's qualities and potential are obvious to me but the risk are also obvious especially at kind of fee. But I don't think that I prefer to wait for someone else or that it is smarter because the striker market lacks safe options and has lacked them for while.
 
He and Amrabat turning down PSG and Liverpool is so refreshing. Sure they're not world beaters, but it'll be really nice to continue to add players with that hunger to play for United.
 
Kane would cost £120m minimum, with an astronomical salary. Plus he has no resale value either.
What's the source for that? It's a straight choice between sell now and lose for free next summer. We can negotiate with Kane from January.
 
He's under instruction to sell from the owner though? If Spurs want money for him and he rejects Bayern move - which I expect he will, then Kane is an option. I think that would be the figure for a player turning 30 this season with 1 year on his contract.
I think the owner has bigger problems at the moment.
 
Awful, awful take. Seen a 2 minute clip of him failing to control the ball properly, so suddenly he is technically very poor :lol:
Watched all of his touches from most big games he's played. I think it's you who has only watched his "best skillz and goalz".

Watch his performances here and tell me honestly that you think he’s ready to lead the line for United:

 
Awful, awful take. Seen a 2 minute clip of him failing to control the ball properly, so suddenly he is technically very poor :lol:
:lol:
Did you just lazily assume what someone is basing their take off? He is quite unpolished at times. If you watch his all touch videos and not stick to highlights you'd actually understand this.
 
Watched all of his touches from most big games he's played. I think it's you who has only watched his "best skillz and goalz"

If you think he is technically very poor, then you simply don't know the player, and it's quite obvious to everyone who do. Watching some of his touches in a YouTube compilation really says nothing.
 
:lol:
Did you just lazily assume what someone is basing their take off? He is quite unpolished at times. If you watch his all touch videos and not stick to highlights you'd actually understand this.

Ever since someone posted that 2 min video of him not controlling the ball brilliantly, he's "technically very poor". He is absolutely unpolished, but technically very poor is simply objectively wrong. Watch his Denmark matches, for instance.

And the irony in you saying I assumed where his take was based from, and you follow up by doing the exact same :wenger:
 
You have to look at the total cost during the contract, and Kane’s wages would be massivly higher

Spurs will drag the Kane saga out until the very last day of the transfer window. Only using us to panic Bayern into breaking their transfer record. Either way, we lose out.

Rasmus is within our control, we are in the driving seat. We are in charge of our own destiny. The way it should be.

Trust in Ten Hag, he hasn't let us down yet.

I think this lad is going to be special. He looks the real deal. Has much more to his game than a tap in merchant. He can hold the ball up, take people on, drive at defenders, drift out wide, play others in. Can shoot with his left or right and he is great in the air. He has that strikers instinct and anticipation in the six yard box. 20 years old, so lots of energy and hunger. Ten Hag and Benny McCarthy will make him better.
 
Watched all of his touches from most big games he's played. I think it's you who has only watched his "best skillz and goalz".

Watch his performances here and tell me honestly that you think he’s ready to lead the line for United:



Am I missing something? He looks pretty good in that video?
 
Ever since someone posted that 2 min video of him not controlling the ball brilliantly, he's "technically very poor". He is absolutely unpolished, but technically very poor is simply objectively wrong. Watch his Denmark matches, for instance.

And the irony in you saying I assumed where his take was based from, and you follow up by doing the exact same :wenger:
Watch the Twitter thread that I posted. All touches in games he played last year.
 
Watched all of his touches from most big games he's played. I think it's you who has only watched his "best skillz and goalz".

Watch his performances here and tell me honestly that you think he’s ready to lead the line for United:



I think that you shared the wrong compilation.
 
We are slowly rebuilding a broken mismanaged club/squad not trying to buy the league this season. This signing fits perfectly with that ethos. We have so many anxious fans. We weren’t going to win the league this year with Kane and Oshimen either. Enjoy the journey. We are slowly improving and evolving.
 
70m euros for him is crazy. Between this guy, Antony and Sancho, and if Martial doesn't fix his injury issues, we're going to be relying on Rashford for goals again.

I'm starting to question whoever's in charge of our transfers because it's not been great.
 
All i have seen from Højlund is a young guy mad with football and a nose for goal. My only worry when the rumours came out about this transfer is lack of minutes, but it seems Ten Hag wants him as the main man, so i'm all for this transfer.

Him being a United fan is also a huge plus, and his attitude fits what TH is trying to build.
 
Ever since someone posted that 2 min video of him not controlling the ball brilliantly, he's "technically very poor". He is absolutely unpolished, but technically very poor is simply objectively wrong. Watch his Denmark matches, for instance.

And the irony in you saying I assumed where his take was based from, and you follow up by doing the exact same :wenger:
He didn't base it off the 2 minute video. He said that himself.

So yes you did assume.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.