King Azaz the Unabridged
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
- Messages
- 878
If anybody had any doubts to how overrated he is they have been assuaged by his brilliant performance at PSG where he took over a team that was top of the table in a 1 horse race and managed to finish 2nd and has through 12 months in the job achieved a significantly poorer points per game performance than both Tuchel and Emery before him despite having an even better squad.
Not to get too deep into this because I see a whole bunch of people have already picked your posts in this thread apart (got a good chuckle out of Dean Smith apparently being a better manager than Pochettino), but just going to point out since you've chosen to focus on points per game:
1) The difference between Pochettino's points per game at PSG (2.33) vs Tuchel (2.37) and Emery (2.37) is really quite minor. Very curious use of "significantly"
2) Pochettino actually averaged significantly more points per game in the league than Tuchel last season (2.24 vs 2.06). So we'll leave it open for discussion who actually lost the 1-horse race
3) Pochettino's performances in that four-year spell from 2015 to 2019 are the textbook definition of over-achieving if you actually understand how to apply context to the transfer and wage spending across the league - and your posts tell me you don't. Instead of focusing on "300 million spent" (in 5 years) as if that's a massive amount of money relative to the competition (it's not), go back and check the difference in Tottenham's spending (particularly on wages, which are the clearly established key factor correlated with league performance) compared with ours, Chelsea's and City's (even Arsenal and Liverpool were way ahead of them) across those four seasons. Then you'll understand why people rate him as a manager for consistently competing with these teams and finishing above at least 2 of them.
Last edited: