justsomebloke
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2020
- Messages
- 6,304
I don't think so. Nearly all of those are peripheral players. That is not what we are talking about.
And come on, it's not as if making changes to the core if the team, including selling or dropping 2 or 3 key players, is an extraordinary and unheard of thing. It's quite feasible, given will.
I didn't answer because it made no sense again.I get what you're saying mate but saying something needs done is easy enough but actually achieving it often isn't as straight forward.
If we are to assume Ralf meant 8-10 new players over 2 summer transfer windows with a decent clear out as well. Then it looks like the club are trying to achieve that with varying amounts of success are they not?
Players out- Pogba, Cavani, Mata, Lingard, Matic, Grant, Pereira, Henderson, Telles with possibly AWB, Bailly and Jones following. So probably at least 10 players out by the end of the window.
Players in- Malacia, Martinez, Eriksen, with possibly Rabiot, DeJong and a forward arriving that could be 6 new arrivals by the end of the window.
Repeat that next summer and the squad would will be drastically different to the one that finished last season. Whether it will be better who can say and whether or not that's exactly what Ralf had in mind again who knows but it's clear that the club and ETH are trying to reshape the squad even if it doesn't seem to be going exactly to plan. And to be fair the DeJong unpaid wages saga and Ronaldo deciding he wants to leave a few days before pre-season are both things out of the club and Ten Hag's control.
You don't want to answer, no worries mate.
I'd really like Neto!
You lot are taking the piss. He took the job, he brought in the back room staff, he alienated players, he made his role untenable. He did those things to himself. Nobody did it to him. Nobody has said he was wrong, he was basically saying what had already been discussed on here. Personally, I felt he should have communicated it in private to the people who needed to know.In hindsight its a miracle we didn't finish in the bottom half.
He didn't but keep making shit upYou lot are taking the piss. He took the job, he brought in the back room staff, he alienated players, he made his role untenable. He did those things to himself. Nobody did it to him. Nobody has said he was wrong, he was basically saying what had already been discussed on here. Personally, I felt he should have communicated it in private to the people who needed to know.
So in summary, he did some things that were right and resonated with how a lot of posters on here felt, which is why he is now cafgard with a legion of disciples..... But,
He was shit as a manager, he did quantifiably worse than Ole and every other manager post SAF.
He did thoughHe didn't but keep making shit up
Go look it up somewhere in the last 10 pages. He had higher points per game than OGS in the final season. Any other comparison is nonsensical or mootHe did though
He had pretty much the same players Ole started the season with, redcafe was pretty optimistic at the time. feck me that 4222 was horrible....
why because you say so? The football was horrible in the beginning and not much better by the end, what was good about any of it?Go look it up somewhere in the last 10 pages. He had higher points per game than OGS in the final season. Any other comparison is nonsensical or moot
Because you compare like for like. Am I talking to a child?why because you say so? The football was horrible in the beginning and not much better by the end, what was good about any of it?
Ralf Cafgod got you good....
Interim period for interim period? Ole still comes out on top..... I know you hate the guy but don't let it cloud your judgement.Because you compare like for like. Am I talking to a child?
Go look it up somewhere in the last 10 pages. He had higher points per game than OGS in the final season. Any other comparison is nonsensical or moot
Interim period for interim period? Ole still comes out on top..... I know you hate the guy but don't let it cloud your judgement.
The man said like for like. The fact that you guys have to keep moving the goal posts should be a clue to you...Comparing Ole's part of 2021/2022 season to Ralf's part of season.
Interim period for interim period? Ole still comes out on top..... I know you hate the guy but don't let it cloud your judgement.
You can compare their interim spells only and Ralf still doesn't look good.So 2 managers had same players at their disposal for lets say X month each, some comparing work of those 2 with same squad and thats moving a goal posts
Because of the excuses dished out for RR such as "not his players" "couldn't sign his players" "no pre season" etc...Nobody can question that but why you comparing interim job of Ole with squad A vs interim job of RR with squad B
You can compare their interim spells only and Ralf still doesn't look good.
Because of the excuses dished out for RR such as "not his players" "couldn't sign his players" "no pre season" etc...
But mostly because the guy above said like for like. Personally I think it should be apparent to everyone that he was shit here as a manager, so it's interesting when that view gets challenged.
RR had the lowest win percentage of all Man Utd managers since Frank O'Farrell (1972).
This is one of the most illogical things I have seen on the caf. It's pointless comparing managers because they rarely have the same situation but Ole sack season/Ragnick interim is as close as you can get. Same exact team, zero signings for Ragnick - same opposition.Interim period for interim period? Ole still comes out on top..... I know you hate the guy but don't let it cloud your judgement.
Still a higher win percentage than Ralf, believe it or not. Ralf only has 11 wins in 31.This is one of the most illogical things I have seen on the caf. It's pointless comparing managers because they rarely have the same situation but Ole sack season/Rangnick interim is as close as you can get. Same exact team, zero signings for Rangnick - same opposition.
Ole was shit last season, he was decent before that, and that interim period had people giddy as feck. Ralf was shit last season. This is how I see things. All this pining for Ralf baffles me because we didn't see anything great from him. He said some shit? Woohoo!This is one of the most illogical things I have seen on the caf. It's pointless comparing managers because they rarely have the same situation but Ole sack season/Rangnick interim is as close as you can get. Same exact team, zero signings for Rangnick - same opposition.
Because you compare like for like. Am I talking to a child?
Yes I'm not arguing for/against either but bizarre you wouldn't compare the same season under to managers, probably the only time it's useful to do so.Still a higher win percentage than Ralf, believe it or not. Ralf only has 11 wins in 31.
Ole was shit last season, he was decent before that, and that interim period had people giddy as feck. Ralf was shit last season. This is how I see things. All this pining for Ralf baffles me because we didn't see anything great from him. He said some shit? Woohoo!
It's entirely possible that he would be as bad as he was as manager, as a consultant or DOF. I'm sure nobody out of all the people involved in this thought he'd be so bad as a manager for us but MUFC is a different beast, a lot of people have come with reputations, and failed.
And I am going to be pedantic as well - Ralf lost Greenwood who could and did literally win us games by himself and by January, both Cavani and Lingard wanted to leave but were not allowed to and performed accordingly.This is one of the most illogical things I have seen on the caf. It's pointless comparing managers because they rarely have the same situation but Ole sack season/Rangnick interim is as close as you can get. Same exact team, zero signings for Rangnick - same opposition.
Your basically just choosing to favour one set of variables "whos team" "no preseason" "no staff" for another "same players" "same season" etc. It's neither here nor there to me the guy was crap as a manager, and hasn't left me with confidence you guys seem to have. He could work out here.... he could send the club into another tails spin like the one we seem to be in now. Who knows?Yes I'm not arguing for/against either but bizarre you wouldn't compare the same season under to managers, probably the only time it's useful to do so.
No one is pining for Ralf as a coach, he's not an elite coach. You were trying to say it was better to compare Ole's interim period in 2018 with Ralf's interim period in 2021...that makes no sense whatsoever. It's obviously possible Ralf wouldn't be good as a DoF but is it likely or not he'd be better than the current incumbent who has zero experience in that role prior? That's what people are angry about.
Yes I'm not arguing for/against either but bizarre you wouldn't compare the same season under to managers, probably the only time it's useful to do so.
He told the club what was necessary. The Glazers were never going to appoint strong and independent minds into key positions, such as CEO, as Ragnick wanted. Rangnick wasn't a yes man, he was prepared to speak openly about the state of the club, including the performance of the owners, thus he had to go.I keep seeing this, but is it based on anything or is it just one of those things that people say because why not?
I mean, we knew we were getting a new manager in. Rangnick’s “consultancy” role was vague to begin with.
What are people basing their “was sacked for telling the truth” assessments on?
Learn to read the post, understand the context and then reply in the future.So, you want to compare Ole last year to RR last year?
Ole was atrocious last year, and that's why he was sacked.
RR was equally atrocious last year, and that's why he was terminated.
Both were losers and failures. Neither had anything to offer.
Happy?
What are you talking about? I didn’t say any of that stuff. I said the period you dismissed is actually the only logical period you can compare them.Your basically just choosing to favour one set of variables "whos team" "no preseason" "no staff" for another "same players" "same season" etc. It's neither here nor there to me the guy was crap as a manager, and hasn't left me with confidence you guys seem to have. He could work out here.... he could send the club into another tails spin like the one we seem to be in now. Who knows?
It was the guy above that was looking at comparisons between the two as if they werent both shit for us last season. The only thing for me is that he made a shit situation worse!
Dismissed?What are you talking about? I didn’t say any of that stuff. I said the period you dismissed is actually the only logical period you can compare them.
He told the club what was necessary. The Glazers were never going to appoint strong and independent minds into key positions, such as CEO, as Rangnick wanted. Rangnick wasn't a yes man, he was prepared to speak openly about the state of the club, including the performance of the owners, thus he had to go.
Literally go up about 10 postsDismissed?
How about you just show me? I don't know what you are talking about?Literally go up about 10 posts
Basically, Rangnick should have been here for two more years, working alongside ETH, as we all know. However, Rangnick wouldn't be controlled or censored as the owners had intended and hoped. He worried them with his honesty. Suddenly his role wasn't required. Of course there are two sides to every story, but that's the impression I have been left with, having read and listened to numerous media sources.This doesn’t really answer my question, thanks though.