Do you have anything to qualify that opinion? Or shall we just take your word for it as a football guru?
Possibly because he has a wand of a left foot.Yeah, I suppose that's what separates the good enough from the great. You just feel RvP would've buried it.
I disagree with you.
I don't paint myself as a football guru, but nor do I view you as one
Do you have anything to qualify that opinion? Or shall we just take your word for it as a football guru?
A bit like this, you mean?
Ive knocked at that particular door without ever an answerExcellent stuff. This is what discussion forum's are all about, really. Arrogantly dismissing other people's opinions, ignoring any relevant counter-points (e.g. very pertinent Rooney video) and then side-stepping the discussion entirely to protect a bizarre agenda. You gotta love it.
And you've take the crap out of context. Please show a clip when we are pressing, I clearly remember two city defenders on Rooney at a stage. Chelsea had no such fear, they had one person on Falcao, sometimes. They mostly allowed him to roam around on his own and he got chances in the second half but they still didn't feel enough to have someone on him constantly.
He was actually better then what I expected (which was totally rock bottom levels of shitness) - at times his touch and pass was fine and his darts in close areas were good. The problem for me was that, in general, again his runs are really poor. He spends a lot of time hiding behind opposition players, not really doing anything to make the space for himself... which completely removes him as an outlet for periods of the game.
He also should have scored his chance - big game like this that's as good a chance as you're going to get.
Excellent stuff. This is what discussion forum's are all about, really. Arrogantly dismissing other people's opinions, ignoring any relevant counter-points (e.g. very pertinent Rooney video) and then side-stepping the discussion entirely to protect a bizarre agenda. You gotta love it.
We are pressing. Valencia wins the ball back and squeezes the midfield along with Mata and Fellaini, and it's left to Rooney to press the defenders. He does that but doesn't exert too much energy and consequently Kompany, Demichelis and Zabaleta are able to pass it around the back to start a move which ultimately ends in a goal. If Falcao did that he'd be slaughtered, we'd see a dozen replays and Gary Neville would analyse it to the nth degree to show how Falcao simply isn't doing enough as a striker.
To be fair and honest, Brwned, your reply to me was rude and dismissive - a green smiley, a nasty comment and a 40 second clip that has no context to what we're talking about. This is your usual approach whenever we engage, fair enough, but I've not been arrogant toward you - I just don't agree with your opinion here.
What is there to side-step? Rooney spent the entire City game pressing and pinning his CBs and was praised at length by Nev and Carra on MNF for it with footage highlighting his effectiveness.
You might not agree with me, or them, but objectively speaking, they know way more about football than you - even if I don't!
I've been honest about my opinions on Falcao today, it isn't agenda posting just because I don't think we should sign him.
It's about time we stop dreaming about this gentleman. No need to be rude or anything, just let him have a rest and return quietly to Monaco. There will always be a new club for him. To let him play is nothing but a waste of time - for everyone involved. Thanks for your time and devotion. I'm not complaning about your attitude, it's just that you're not good enough for this club right now. I wish you all the best Falcao.
Nope. Would rather have Ings on a free to be honest.If he was available on a free transfer (but still £200K p/w wages), would anyone want him? I don't think I would if I was a United fan.
If he was available on a free transfer (but still £200K p/w wages), would anyone want him? I don't think I would if I was a United fan.
Well said. Rooney was getting slaughtered on here until Neville pulled a few clips together, now he's amazing (again) and everyone is satisfied with his role in recent games.I'd describe it as quite simply laughing off you being rude and dismissive, personally. You're the one that told us we were wrong. Simple as that.
What Neville did was throw three (?) clips together to paint a narrative that his audience wanted to hear. Firstly it was showing something that the cameras couldn't see - even something he couldn't see, the great Gary Neville - so it must be some really key insight, it's real added value stuff, the kind of analysis that only a premium sports broadcaster like Sky and their #1 pundit could give you. Secondly it was a positive story that went against the grain about England's #1 player, Manchester United's captain, and therefore a player that the British audience are always interested to hear about.
You could throw three clips together to paint an entirely different story, a story that Rooney's touch, his hold-up play and his all-round contribution was simply not up to scratch. It's the kind of story that a lot of people would've agreed with and would've posted on here and used as evidence of his drop on form over the past few weeks, so it would've engaged the audience, but it wouldn't have had that added value factor. That's all there was to it, IMO. I could throw together those three clips now to paint a very different story but you would just dismiss it, you see.
Football really isn't rocket science. You don't need to have played the game at the highest level to understand it (ask Sacchi), and you don't need to have been involved at the top level to recognise whether someone has played well.
What Neville did was throw three (?) clips together to paint a narrative that his audience wanted to hear. Firstly it was showing something that the cameras couldn't see - even something he couldn't see, the great Gary Neville - so it must be some really key insight, it's real added value stuff, the kind of analysis that only a premium sports broadcaster like Sky and their #1 pundit could give you. Secondly it was a positive story that went against the grain about England's #1 player, Manchester United's captain, and therefore a player that the British audience are always interested to hear about.
What if Gary Neville said he was fantastic today?Bull, I hadn't even seen GN's broadcast until two days ago and I had seen Rooney pulling players with him all over the place including having two mark him. Did GN ever say that Rooney was marked by two players at times? No! Yet I picked it up watching the game, just as everyone else had.
Don't need GN to explain things when it's clear to see, well to some of us anyway.
Falcao though was pants. I also don't need GN to tell me that. I saw it.
If he was available on a free transfer (but still £200K p/w wages), would anyone want him? I don't think I would if I was a United fan.
I'd describe it as quite simply laughing off you being rude and dismissive, personally. You're the one that told us we were wrong. Simple as that.
What Neville did was throw three (?) clips together to paint a narrative that his audience wanted to hear. Firstly it was showing something that the cameras couldn't see - even something he couldn't see, the great Gary Neville - so it must be some really key insight, it's real added value stuff, the kind of analysis that only a premium sports broadcaster like Sky and their #1 pundit could give you. Secondly it was a positive story that went against the grain about England's #1 player, Manchester United's captain, and therefore a player that the British audience are always interested to hear about.
You could throw three clips together to paint an entirely different story, a story that Rooney's touch, his hold-up play and his all-round contribution was simply not up to scratch. It's the kind of story that a lot of people would've agreed with and would've posted on here and used as evidence of his drop on form over the past few weeks, so it would've engaged the audience, but it wouldn't have had that added value factor. That's all there was to it, IMO. I could throw together those three clips now to paint a very different story but you would just dismiss it, you see.
Football really isn't rocket science. You don't need to have played the game at the highest level to understand it (ask Sacchi), and you don't need to have been involved at the top level to recognise whether someone has played well.
What if Gary Neville said he was fantastic today?
ConspiracyKeanu.jpeg
Unlucky not to score today though.
Again his shot wasn't unlucky, he should have hit the target (and scored really).