Did well overall today... Still hope we don't sign him though. Not what we need longterm, which is essentially what he's playing for.
I agree (unless we could negotiate the fee down).
Did well overall today... Still hope we don't sign him though. Not what we need longterm, which is essentially what he's playing for.
Even then, I have nothing against him but having him in the squad does more harm then good I think. It forces Rooney back into midfield, forcing mata or Herrera on the bench. And IMO we'd just be better having Rooney in his proper position and Herrera in midfield. Much better. That's the problem that falcao has, even if he does okay, we will still probably look better as a team with him on the bench and others moved around in their proper positions.I agree (unless we could negotiate the fee down).
Yup they really mucked up easy passes to give him a clear opportunity.He would have scored more if passes from Di Maria, Rooney and I think Adnan were more precise. Simple passes were playing him out wide.
Its confidence, it will come.Agreed, I haven't yet seen him score a typical Falcao goal that I remember when I think of him, the closest to it was vs Everton, the rest have been scrappy, and a header.
Was a lot better today overall though.
Or BaleGood game today. Best he's played in weeks. But I agree with whoever above suggested that we could well need a different kind of striker, one in the mould of Aguero or Suarez.
Nonsense, as long as movement is good then its not essential. We've had 3 wonderful strikers at the club in recent years that go completely against that theory.That moment in the second half where Rooney played it across goal was typical of Falcao so far. It was about a yard or so over hit, but still quite gettable. The likes of Aguero, Costa, Benzema, Rooney himself etc etc would have gobbled that chance up. But Falcao just couldn't move his body in time and instead was left chasing after the ball and turning back. He just hasn't got that initial yard of pace anymore, thats so vital at the top level.
He's doing decent but after giving him the benefit of the doubt, I don't think he is going to cut it long term. The team could really do with a livewire, dribbling striker up front in the mould of a Costa/Suarez/Aguero. Instead of constant passing back and layoffs which slow down the attack, we'd have someone who gets the ball, twists and turns.. and turns defence into attack in an instant.
None of the forwards we have do that.. Danny was the only one, shame he was crap at scoring goals and anything but a livewire in the final third - even if we put rooney up top, we'd still have this issue. I'd love a 06 Saha playing up top for this side.
Very good chance? It would've been a stunner if he'd volleyed that in.RVP took his goal well but didn't do much more than Falcao, infact RVP missed a very good chance where he had a clear shot on goal but fluffed the volley and ballooned it, if that was Falcao he would be getting slaughtered right now.
Nonsense, as long as movement is good then its not essential. We've had 3 wonderful strikers at the club in recent years that go completely against that theory.
Even then, I have nothing against him but having him in the squad does more harm then good I think. It forces Rooney back into midfield, forcing mata or Herrera on the bench. And IMO we'd just be better having Rooney in his proper position and Herrera in midfield. Much better. That's the problem that falcao has, even if he does okay, we will still probably look better as a team with him on the bench and others moved around in their proper positions.
Teddy, RVN, Ole.Who?
Thought he was very good today personally.
Teddy, RVN, Ole.
You can't convince me Ole and RVN were quick off the spot, they were intelligent players who could read the game and possessed great movement. Once Falcao gets his confidence back he'll be a huge asset.RVN was probably one of the sharpest strikers ever seen. He'd turn situations that weren't even chances into goals just with his movement and reactions. Ole's reactions and movement were pretty damn quick too. Neither were the quickest over a distance, but both certainly had that initial burst of speed needed in the area
Teddy I'll give you, but he was a completely different kind of striker to others, and wasn't exactly a prolific goalscorer either.
You can't convince me Ole and RVN were quick off the spot, they were intelligent players who could read the game and possessed great movement. Once Falcao gets his confidence back he'll be a huge asset.
Good game today. Best he's played in weeks. But I agree with whoever above suggested that we could well need a different kind of striker, one in the mould of Aguero or Suarez.
Even then, I have nothing against him but having him in the squad does more harm then good I think. It forces Rooney back into midfield, forcing mata or Herrera on the bench. And IMO we'd just be better having Rooney in his proper position and Herrera in midfield. Much better. That's the problem that falcao has, even if he does okay, we will still probably look better as a team with him on the bench and others moved around in their proper positions.
Decent game today.
My problem is this: What is it that he has provided in a United shirt (or Monaco shirt for that matter) that warrants us forking out north of £25 million to buy him - let alone the £35 mill or £40 mill being bandied about?
Or to put it harshly: What is it that he provides that say Rickie Lambert wouldn't? Which is quite a scary thought.
13 in 22 for Monaco is hardly shit considering his injuries and general rust.Decent game today.
My problem is this: What is it that he has provided in a United shirt (or Monaco shirt for that matter) that warrants us forking out north of £25 million to buy him - let alone the £35 mill or £40 mill being bandied about?
Or to put it harshly: What is it that he provides that say Rickie Lambert wouldn't? Which is quite a scary thought.
Comparing Falcao to Lambert is a bit ridiculous to be honest.
It absolutely baffles me why seemingly some of our own fans want him to fail when he gives his all to the club but were loyal to the end to Carlos Tevez for example.
I would rather we kept him, but re-negotiated the price first
He was excellent in continental/cup competitions, and had great performances against big clubs. Starting from his time at Porto to his time at Atletico, he had goal returns of 34, 38, 36, 34, respectively. Those are the kind of goal scoring numbers you would expect from a world class striker.Why was Falcao branded world class when his goal record wasn't much different than Negredo and Soldado? Fair amount were penalties too.
I didn't follow Atletico with Falcao much. Interested to know people's opinions.
Why was Falcao branded world class when his goal record wasn't much different than Negredo and Soldado? Fair amount were penalties too.
I didn't follow Atletico with Falcao much. Interested to know people's opinions.
Why was Falcao branded world class when his goal record wasn't much different than Negredo and Soldado? Fair amount were penalties too.
I didn't follow Atletico with Falcao much. Interested to know people's opinions.
What? How on earth can you compare him to Lambert? Jesus fecking Christ.Decent game today.
My problem is this: What is it that he has provided in a United shirt (or Monaco shirt for that matter) that warrants us forking out north of £25 million to buy him - let alone the £35 mill or £40 mill being bandied about?
Or to put it harshly: What is it that he provides that say Rickie Lambert wouldn't? Which is quite a scary thought.
Had Rooney played the right 2 yard pass Falcao could have had 2 today lets not forget.
No, it is all extenuating factors. Always.Thats the thing with Falcao, its always every body else's fault. The pass/cross is always a yard too far ahead, slightly over hit, poorly weighted etc etc Maybe its just that Falcao is a yard too slow?
How is 204/321 similar to 192/435 or 208/455?
That's literally over 110 games less to get to 200 goals. A .63 average compared to .44 and .45. In the small margins of strikers that's an enormous difference.