Can we trade Van Persie for Falcao? I'd do it in a heartbeat... Radamel has looked far better even in miserable physical condition. Van Persie has scored a few goals but he looks completely off form still, even this deep into the season.
Can we trade Van Persie for Falcao? I'd do it in a heartbeat... Radamel has looked far better even in miserable physical condition. Van Persie has scored a few goals but he looks completely off form still, even this deep into the season.
We had to put up with over a month of RVP putting in really dismal performances (worse than Falcao today) before he came back into form and was capable of playing the full 90, and Falcao is coming back from injury as well, people just need to be patient with him instead of expecting the moon on a stick just because of his wages.
You are looking at it the wrong way. If in one game you have one player score 4 out of 10 goalscoring opportunities, and a second player score 2 out of 5 goalscoring opportunities, by your logic the first player is worse, because he has missed twice more. I would take the first player any day - he gets in more dangerous positions and also produces more goals.He is missing to much, again today we could see it. Goal or assist per 90 minutes is good, but when you had enough clear chances to score 2 goals per game (again, QPR, Everton, Hull, today, enough chances to have a much better statistic) and you don't have it even close, then it's a problem.
How much more does he have to miss so that some people admit that he is near the player (goal danger) we are expecting him to be?
And all this discussion because of a comment which can even be proven with stats (take just the Welbeck's stats from last season where he played as a striker) and where I even said TILL NOW.
Can we trade Van Persie for Falcao? I'd do it in a heartbeat... Radamel has looked far better even in miserable physical condition. Van Persie has scored a few goals but he looks completely off form still, even this deep into the season.
You are looking at it the wrong way. If in one game you have one player score 4 out of 10 goalscoring opportunities, and a second player score 2 out of 5 goalscoring opportunities, by your logic the first player is worse, because he has missed twice more. I would take the first player any day - he gets in more dangerous positions and also produces more goals.
I actually thought Van Persie was better than Falcao today but his stats are a lot worse. Credit where it's due to Falcao. I guess he's being criticised (including by me) for looking so clumsy at times. His contribution, statistically, was decent enough.
Knee jerkers out in force in this thread jeezus Christ.
He had a pretty poor game (as did RVP yet again) and people saying his legs of gone, crazy. He was excellent only a few days ago vs Newcastle. He did look tired in the second half but I think all this game time will benefit him in the long run.
He is going to need a run of 7-8 starts before judgments can be made
He is gets still into decent amount of chances, just needs to start scoring again, which should come, I hope.
Exactly, that instinct to get in the right positions hasn't gone, it's just actually taking the chances that is letting him down at the moment, but yeah that should come hopefully. The Welbeck comparisons some have made are utter ridiculous, let it go he has left the club.
Played the whole Villa game.I think that was his first full 90 mins for us today and he did ok. He is going to improve.
You're not wrong Brophs. It seems we signed up to a pretty crazy deal.If there was an option to send him back in Jan and we could get a really good striker (two very big ifs, I know) then it wouldn't really bother me, tbh. As far as I can see we're basically paying a shitload of money to rehab a player that can't be a million miles away from being past his best, just for the chance to massively overpay for him.
He's obviously a game lad who is very talented but he's clearly injury prone and he leaves our attack looking very one paced. Had we bought him after Porto or even Atletico then it would have been a good move. Thus far I haven't seen a single reason to buy him.
As far as I can see we're basically paying a shitload of money to rehab a player that can't be a million miles away from being past his best, just for the chance to massively overpay for him.
If there was an option to send him back in Jan and we could get a really good striker (two very big ifs, I know) then it wouldn't really bother me, tbh. As far as I can see we're basically paying a shitload of money to rehab a player that can't be a million miles away from being past his best, just for the chance to massively overpay for him.
He's obviously a game lad who is very talented but he's clearly injury prone and he leaves our attack looking very one paced. Had we bought him after Porto or even Atletico then it would have been a good move. Thus far I haven't seen a single reason to buy him.
A more optimistic spin would be that we saw a chance to sign one of the best strikers in the game, while still in his prime, and grabbed it with both hands. The downside being that it would take him a few months to get back to his best after a long time out injured.
We'll know in April/May exactly how realistic that sort of optimism was. For all his struggles for form, I'm not sure I'd be too happy if a club like Arsenal or Liverpool had signed him, put it that way.
A more optimistic spin would be that we saw a chance to sign one of the best strikers in the game, while still in his prime, and grabbed it with both hands. The downside being that it would take him a few months to get back to his best after a long time out injured.
We'll know in April/May exactly how realistic that sort of optimism was. For all his struggles for form, I'm not sure I'd be too happy if a club like Arsenal or Liverpool had signed him, put it that way.
RVP missed the easier chances today yet it's Falcao getting the stick. Weird.
RVP missed the easier chances today yet it's Falcao getting the stick. Weird.
I think we watched different games.Van Persie's all round play was very good whereas Falcao struggled to keep hold of the ball over and over again. It's not all about missed chances.
Van Persie's all round play was very good whereas Falcao struggled to keep hold of the ball over and over again. It's not all about missed chances.
Tis the CafRVP missed the easier chances today yet it's Falcao getting the stick. Weird.
RVP is a proven striker in England. Falcao is not.
He's a busy bee.
Van Persie's all round play was very good whereas Falcao struggled to keep hold of the ball over and over again. It's not all about missed chances.