I was more talking about Welbeck for us (I have seen some Arsenal games and I don't get them as in lot situation they would have 4 players in the box, but Welbeck outside and trying to keep the ball and find someone, even if he is supposed to be the main striker, but that's another story anyway), and how he did when he played a striker (did you see the stats from last season, when he played as a striker - he was actually our best striker, with the best chances conversion). Also, Falcao actually missed quite a few chances (QPR, WBA, Everton were all HUGE chances, so these were really big misses, which we don't expect from him).
OK, put Falcao on the wing and lets see his stats, thas what you are actually doing when you compare Welbeck's stats as Man Utd player. Falcao not only that he wouldn't score, he would not do anything good for the team as a winger.
As far as I know Welbeck was our most dangerous goalscorer last season when he played as a striker?
I just don't get how people don't understand what I am saying!? It was always said that Welbeck's overall play is good, but he doesn't score enough. This same is said for Falcao during his time at United and we can all see it. But when I compared them, suddenly there is a problem and also excuses about his fitness. Who cares? Welbeck played huge percentage of his games as a winger so that's his excuse. Shell I compare how much they cost and then see what we got till now from Falcao?
I really like what I see from Falcao and I also said that I expect great things from him, as you can see how dangerous he is, and also unselfish and we all know his past and that he is a born goalscorer, so that's all fine, but no one can say that I wasn't right with my comment before and actually prove it (I don't care about his fitness as I am not blaming him for anything, or saying that he is bad, or something like that, but it is a fact that his overall play is good, but he doesn't score enough - YET) .