UnsungHero
Full Member
One of the greatest people to ever exist. RIP.
New PM and Monarch in the same week. If the rule of three's apply, then what do we need to expect before the end of the week.
Was she though? Was she really?One of the greatest people to ever exist. RIP.
I suppose the sentiment is for a nation in the 21st century to wake up finally now that the last relic of their past is gone.You “now is the time to end the monarchy” folks know that King Charles III is already king, right?
New PM and Monarch in the same week. If the rule of three's apply, then what do we need to expect before the end of the week.
Was she though? Was she really?
If anything, she left the world without much pain and not being dependent on others to live her life. Her supporters should celebrate the life she lived than her passing.
Die hard republicans don't care of her apolitical behavior that it only served their own survival ( As someone would accept the royals meddling in politics)
Die hard republicans care, among other things, that no one should have the birth right to be in a government institution symbolic power place and have the right over money through taxes, nobiliary titles, corruption, impunity and live on properties plundered along the centuries. It doesn't make sense
I mean you can also mourn without going completely over the topOne of the greatest people to ever exist. RIP.
Yeah, no, definitely not. The feck did she do that was great?Categorically, yes.
Yeah, no, definitely not. The feck did she do that was great?
I suppose the sentiment is for a nation in the 21st century to wake up finally now that the last relic of their past is gone.
One of the greatest people to ever exist. RIP.
One of the greatest people to ever exist. RIP.
So, nothing then.I'm not prepared to debate this now with an anti-monarchist loon.
Already happened, Tuchel got the bootNew PM and Monarch in the same week. If the rule of three's apply, then what do we need to expect before the end of the week.
Ok. So the Queen is finally gone, and good riddance, don't you think it's time to get rid of the fecking monarchy? What is this, the Middle Ages?
The majority of the world's population views the monarchy and everyone associated with it, past and present, as murderers and colonisers.And what? Spend loads of money to have elections every four years for a position that has no power? Spend loads of money on a referendum on removing the monarchy? Then, after all that, ending up with William as King/Head-of-State because he is the most popular option. Just seems a completely stupid idea. No money will be saved with removing the monarchy, either, as the vast majority is spent on staff and maintenance for the properties.
I think most people would have reasonably assumed this was your view, but thanks for confirming it.I personally considering protecting sex offenders to be quite offensive, but each to their own
Based on what? Genuine question.One of the greatest people to ever exist. RIP.
There are many relics of the past like inheritance. I propose no one should inherit anything from their parents, it should all go to the govt.I suppose the sentiment is for a nation in the 21st century to wake up finally now that the last relic of their past is gone.
Well, we showed the way to do that. Good luckI suppose the sentiment is for a nation in the 21st century to wake up finally now that the last relic of their past is gone.
TotoAll right Toto.
Of a sovereign stateSecond longest reign in history (behind Louis XIV) apparently.