JTW95
Gullible sausage
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2013
- Messages
- 9,112
The craziest part about all this is that I am really liking Jamie Carragher right now!
ha!!Every playoff game in the lower leagues must end in a riot if that's the case
He's sticking up for the fans who have had enough. Souness trying to make it sound like it was a violent incursion.
It really isJust depressing how many people react to protests with the exact reaction the people in charge want them to have
Wow, disgraceful from them.Whats this about?
You've got no idea about what's been going on or what disorder is.
Look beyond the TV.
Glazers do not give a feck. This will change nothing.
Seriously... Destroying the stadium? What damage was actually done? Corner flag? What else, a flare thrown in empty stands? What is the damage done, £100?Invading the ground is a riot.
I wouldn't say a word had the fans just made it harder for teams to enter the stadium etc. Vandalism, violence and destroying the stadium they all love is like a riot, sorry.
The craziest part about all this is that I am really liking Jamie Carragher right now!
Remember Liverpool fans literally planning an attack on the Manchester city team bus in the champions League and nothing happened.Has a club been docked points for fans' behavior. That's the question you have to ask.
Also it's mainly the responsibility of the stewards to maintain decorum. Not sure the club has the man power to impose any sort curbs on protests outside the ground or even within it if a large crowd comes.
It's brilliant. Love itCarragher and Neville are tag teaming the dumb presenter
it's an awful precedent: what if we were at 2-2?Makes perfect sense, especially with us 6-2 up.
We have no other free slots the game can be played. Liverpool play the one weekend we don't.
Great post. Cheers mate.Anyone who is taking the moral high ground against these protests don't care about your fans feeling against the owners, they couldn't care less whether the Glazers owned you or didn't. It's good to see them show their a*se about it. You've been protesting the owners for a decade on and off, peaceful protest has led you nowhere. Anyone with any bit of investment in fans actually having some ownership over the game is on the side of youse.
Fair play to your boys. I'm fully behind you lot. Wish Liverpool fans had a bit of this about them at the moment.
Wouldn't surprise me. I know what they're like.
If there was only a way to protest against the club and not against the teamgood stuff. who cares if they take points. who actually cares. we were this close to having the club entirely taken away. the government are toothless. this might be toothless too but at least a message to the whole world and to the sponsors that united is toxic.
city fans make me laugh, very happy with the status quo
Well, the problem on this forum is people who "could not give a toss" about anyone with a different view. There have been fans not just at the ground today but at the team hotel, and that's aimed at the preventing the players from leaving. I repeat, I don't like the Glazers as owners and I wish we had better owners, I hate what was being proposed with the ESL, but not for one moment am I prepared to defend what happened today at Old Trafford.I honestly don't have the energy to address this point because it's so wrong. But suffice it to say that if you had a friend who earned 10x more than you, him spending 10x on a car/house or anything of the sort than you does not mean your friend is being wasteful. In this comparison, United has been spending 4-5x of what Newcastle has spent but this doesn't mean the Glazers have done anything for this club. Also, it's the club's money, they've invested feck-all.
We are a bigger club, a bigger business and an actual fecking football institution being run by the Glazers as if we're some small-time club.
As for what the 'commentators' are saying, I honestly could not give a toss. They have their cushy jobs with Sky who have taken PL football off the free-to-air TV and have been making money off it for years. Of course they won't like.
The BBC didn't want to feature people exposing the current government's crimes and corruption. That didn't make it right and neither does what the media are trying to portray here.
Wouldn't happen if they actually protested against the owners instead of assaulting innocent bystanders.Just depressing how many people react to protests with the exact reaction the people in charge want them to have
loving his passionCarragher being a fecking hero here
Your implication was that violence was the only solution. It's not. There is a long history of peaceful protest at civil injustice. Try googling the names Gandhi and Martin Luther King jr to name just a couple. Also violent protest has in many cases been crushed by various regimes. China and Iran come to mind in recent history. So thinking that violence is THE solution is wrong and somewhat naive IMO. Billionaire owners will not be detered by stuff like this. Force will be met with force and all you are doing is undermining the movement to get rid of them.Did I say that? Give us your solution then...
He's a disgrace.Jones won’t leave the violent, unruly angle alone, the absolute wet wipe.
Should be permanently