Sassy Colin
Death or the gladioli!
Davis should be off, clear yellow
Maybe because Young passed to Herrera for the goal... ?How can you say Young changed the game? He wasn't involved in the goal. It was Falcao coming off and the change in formation which brought the goal.
72 min
How did Keown become a commentator?
We have this:No he wasn't.
http://asktheref.com/Soccer Rules/Question/23340/RE: Select Under 11
MIKE SLATTERY OF COLUMBUS , OH USA ASKS...
Question about how to call being active in an offside position. Offensive player A brings ball into area on near side, say, and goalie shifts to cover his near post. Offensive player B (in clear offside position) is within 6 yard box at far post, certainly wishing to be in goalie's peripheral vision, if not face, but not active per se. But player B does distract the goalie doesn't he? And may even drastically alter how the goalie deals with advance of player A. I've heard that the ref must rely on facts, as it were, and that might mean disregarding player B because of perceived inactivity.
So my question is, at what point (if ever?) does player B (being at goalie's hip at far post) constitute enough 'activity' (read: distraction) to force an offside call? Without, of course, being passed the ball.
thanks!
ANSWER PROVIDED BY REFEREE DENNIS WICKHAM
'Active' and 'passive' can be misleading terms.
FIFA defines three ways that a player in offside position infringes law 11: interfering with play: which means touching the ball; interfering with an opponent: which means hindering an opponent's ability to see or play the ball; and gaining an advantage: which touching the ballafter it deflects off an opponent or rebounds off the goal.
Simply being in an offside position is not enough. Keepers are trained to focus on the ball, and being within their peripheral vision is not enough. It does not hinder their ability to see or play the ball.
The player is offside position must do something: this includes movement or gestures that the referee observes has an effect on the keeper. Moreover, the closer the player is to the opponent, the more likely the referee will judge anything the player does has hindered the opponent's ability to see or play the ball. But offside position alone is not enough.
Agree. I think he should have his first yellow rescinded for that.Definitely not a second yellow at all...
Then the keeper is an idiot, because Rooney wasn't even close to being in his line of sight.
Phil Dowd