Exactly.We had 53% possession vs Real Madrid's 47%
Exactly.We had 53% possession vs Real Madrid's 47%
In the first half, with our supposedly best line up, we were bad in possession. Just struggled to bring the ball forward vs a Real Madrid team who isn't famous for their pressing. Off the ball we were slow and they dealt with our pressing comfortably .We had more possession than Madrid,
equal amount of shots on target, equal amount of attempts also.
Question was if we're better in possession not do we have more of it. It was hardly better than the zombie stuff we saw every week last season...We had 53% possession vs Real Madrid's 47%
I meant do we look better in possession as in more coached. Hard to tell pre season, a near 50-50 with RM doesn't tell muchWe had 53% possession vs Real Madrid's 47%
In the first half, with our supposedly best line up, we were bad in possession. Just struggled to bring the ball forward vs a Real Madrid team who isn't famous for their pressing. Off the ball we were slow and they dealt with our pressing comfortably .
Let's just say I'm slightly worried for when the real football starts.
- Mainoo has been the best midfielder in preseason. Make what you wish from it, but he looks like he's the "glue" between defence and midfield, he is also the only one who seems to match opposition midfielders physicality. He might as well vanish once the season starts as we know ETH doesn't fancy diverging from his favourite midfield setup.
- We don't seem anywhere near to solving striker situation.
- We are working on getting the fullbacks inside to support DM.
- Onana and Martinez will be key in build up, the latter will take playmaker role.
- Mount has been playing higher than expected, he's not a direct Eriksen replacement at all.
- we seem to be more of a vertical team than ever before, certainly don't expect us to keep possession more than last season (based on the very limited sample obviously).
I would like to see it both halves. First half I would say they had slightly more possession, then second with the changes we definitely had more than 53%We had 53% possession vs Real Madrid's 47%
I meant do we look better in possession as in more coached. Hard to tell pre season, a near 50-50 with RM doesn't tell much
We have been down one goal since 6th minute. 53 vs 47 means it's an even game. Teams that tend to dominate games get into 58% and above. We are definitely not a possession based team, I also don't think we aspire to be one to be honest.We had 53% possession vs Real Madrid's 47%
This can only be answered after we play a serious game in a setup that might resemble something we might use when the league starts. So far I have not seen any evidence of us being better in possession than last season, quite the opposite to be honest. Our game so far relied on Mainoo doing something, otherwise the games were quite end to end.Any signs well be better in possession?
If we spank Real Madrid 4-0 in pre-season then everyone at the club thinks we have enough with the current squad to be title contenders.
A little wake-up call like this in a meaningless friendly is probably a good thing.
He’s too passive and weak. Maybe if we were prime Barca plying tiki taka it would work but we need a 9. No more shoe horning players.I’m sure I’m in the minority but I am really curious to see if Sancho might work as a striker. I’ve felt this for a season and a half now…I hope we stick with it a bit.
IMHO it’s always seemed like his best attribute has been being clinical in front of the net. It’s been him getting there that’s been the problem…
It's not surprising - Real Madrid are more a counter attacking team, not a possession based team.We had 53% possession vs Real Madrid's 47%
In my opinion preseason is just to confirm things I already know. The only ones that their performances are worth analysing in detail during preseason is new signings and young players.Observations? That results in pre seasons friendlies are worthless and should not be judged. Like it was when we thrashed European champions pre season Madrid and didn’t even qualify for the CL.
Wish we had Bellingham
On the bolded part - I share the same concern. He did make a comment last season that we play too much end-to-end tennis games instead of having a bit more control, and yet he signs Mount what means we're basically becoming even more vertical team. Nothing against Mount, he's a decent player, but this is a strange move. On the other hand, Onana might be transformative if this works and pushes our defense higher up, although that is a rationalization and might not be as effective as we think, because there's still a big gap between back 4+ Casemiro and the rest of the team.United will pay the cost for not reinforcing the wide areas this season. The entire attack offered nothing last season with the exception of one player.
This season it's as if the club is banking on Rashford to bring goals because if he doesn't this team will be in trouble. It's got nothing to do with pre season but observing the biggest weakness the previous campaign. Even if United signed Kane it doesn't equate to a one size fits all category. The wide players will continue to be a concern.
What's odd is that ETH from his quotes in a previous interview has identified this issue but seemingly the targets haven't rectified it. In modern football more goals come from inside forwards as opposed to the midfield (exception of city) so the idea that Mount comes here and scores 15 extra goals for the team is something I can't see unless there's some tactical masterclass involved. Even with Hojlund coming I'd rate the summer purchases on the showing of last season a 5/10.