giorno
boob novice
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2016
- Messages
- 28,821
- Supports
- Real Madrid
Unlikely, too old and expensiveWish Real would hurry up and sign him.
After Hazard i don't see us making that kind of signing anymore
Unlikely, too old and expensiveWish Real would hurry up and sign him.
Has it? They checked out after clinching the title, but until then they were arguably the most dominating side in a single season.I'm glad Liverpool have killed off all of the "best team in premier league" history talk in such spectacular fashion, it was getting quite tiresome
They could declare at half timeThat's pretty generous IMO
City will decimate them
There is the incentive of getting a club record points scoreGenuinely think this is good for us. Pool and Klopp will not want to lose two in a row.
Has it? They checked out after clinching the title, but until then they were arguably the most dominating side in a single season.
Jury's still out for me. Talented, yes.Saka and the other youngsters?
Yet you were absolutely hopeless in your attempts to break them down..Weird game, we definitely aren’t sharp or intense enough but they’re one of the worse sides we’ve played all season.
A game where stats don’t tell the full story. Arsenal really should’ve scored a third through Willock and Liverpool didn’t create a clear cut chance.According to livescore stats liverpool had 2/3rds possession, 13 corners and 25 goal efforts. Arsenal scored with just about their only 2 shots on target.
Seems like a smash and grab.
Was it? I didn't see it
Not really. Liverpool have been on the beach since the restart, and City even longer than that. Their league form this season has been a combination of weirdness and lack of motivation once it became clear they weren't catching liverpoolLiverpool could now finish the season with the same if not less points than they got last season. That highlights how far Man City have regressed in the last 12 months.
So fecking poor, turning it on late when you've had all second half. This 'on the beach' mode and 'yeah but we're champs' from fans needs knocking on the head too. If I knew winning the league so early would see us playing like this I'd rather it have gone right to the wire with City, at least we would have tried to keep up our competitive levels. They need a fecking rocket up their arse for Chelsea.
According to livescore stats liverpool had 2/3rds possession, 13 corners and 25 goal efforts. Arsenal scored with just about their only 2 shots on target.
Seems like a smash and grab.
Was it? I didn't see it
Alexander-Arnold was awful in that regard. Didn't beat the first man once tonight.And 400 crosses into the box...
I wouldn't disagree with that. The media has over hyped us as much as our own fans have.Title winning teams this Liverpool side are better than IMO
Blackburn. Leicester. Chelsea 2010 and 2017, United 2011 and 2013
The idea they are the greatest PL side of all time is hilarious.
Has it? They checked out after clinching the title, but until then they were arguably the most dominating side in a single season.
If Liverpool didn't clinch the title in the 31st match of the season, they would have easily reached 100 points. Similarly, if City would have had no competition last year, they wouldn't reach 100.Did I dream up City's Centurions?
Alexander-Arnold was awful in that regard. Didn't beat the first man once tonight.
Not tough at all. They aren’t better. Simple as that.Record books wont show that though. Its going to be tough for this seasons Liverpool to say they were better City in 17/18.
And 400 crosses into the box...
They probably won't but I don't think it means much. Same as how the Invincible Arsenal are not the best team ever in EPL (or close by).Record books wont show that though. Its going to be tough for this seasons Liverpool to say they were better City in 17/18.
I wouldn’t take him over Shaw or Williams.Kieran Tierney looks a fantastic player for Arsenal.
Has it? They checked out after clinching the title, but until then they were arguably the most dominating side in a single season.
It's not like City were challenged in any way in 2018. Remember, that's when they got the 100 points.If Liverpool didn't clinch the title in the 31st match of the season, they would have easily reached 100 points. Similarly, if City would have had no competition last year, they wouldn't reach 100.
It is always like this. Crazy total amount of points from a club happens only when they are challenged by some other club.
Pretty much. Liverpool threw the game away quite inexplicably after taking the lead then missed quite a few chances in the second half.According to livescore stats liverpool had 2/3rds possession, 13 corners and 25 goal efforts. Arsenal scored with just about their only 2 shots on target.
Seems like a smash and grab.
Was it? I didn't see it
According to livescore stats liverpool had 2/3rds possession, 13 corners and 25 goal efforts. Arsenal scored with just about their only 2 shots on target.
Seems like a smash and grab.
Was it? I didn't see it
Fair enough, we ended 19 points below them.It's not like City were challenged in any way in 2018. Remember, that's when they got the 100 points.
This is actually a much better argument than not reaching 100 points. With Atletico they fecked it up, despite being the far better team. Luckily so, cause if the cnuts would have defended UCL, while winning the league in 31 (or was it 32) matches or so, they would have had a shot at best team ever, let alone best in EPL.Honestly, this is revisionism. They were pretty shite well before they clinched the title. In their last six games before the lockdown, they won only two, losing to Atletico twice and Watford (0-3) and Chelsea (0-2), scraping past West Ham, and Bournemouth by single goal margins. And before that, they only beat Shrewsbury and Norwich 1-0. That's a pretty poor run going back to early March.
Yeah I like him. He’s doing pretty well IMO.Good interview from Arteta there I thought. He comes across well.