Drawfull
Full Member
So basically Michael Jackson (it shouldn't need saying etc.) would always be offside as he leans over. Fecking joke.
For offsides there is no such thing as clear and obvious error. It's onside or offside, rules suck but they are what they areThey're only meant to change the ruling if it was a clear and obvious error. What was clear and obvious about his nose hair maybe being offside?
But it wasn't clear and obvious it was off side.you can write it every time, but clear and obvious error doesn't involve offside.
It's offside or it isn't offside.
Is this a new rule ?VAR have said it is because he came back from an offside position. To me it should only be when the ball is actually passed to him. It is infuriating.
Whatever happened to giving the attacker the benefit in a close decision?
looked level to me
And how accurate are these bent lines they draw to determine if a player's armpit hair is offside?you can write it every time, but clear and obvious error doesn't involve offside.
It's offside or it isn't offside.
How can an arm be offside if you cant score with it?
Very?And how accurate are these bent lines they draw to determine if a player's armpit hair is offside?
VAR have said it is because he came back from an offside position. To me it should only be when the ball is actually passed to him. It is infuriating.
Not anymore if they have the possiblity to go check about every mms now.The benefit of the doubt should be given to the attacker.
VAR is like a power hungry supply teacher trying to suck the fun out of everything. Just feck off you useless crock of shite.
Total BS. And I'm generally in favour of VAR.
It has to be changed to be feet only for next season
Appears so. I am sure they just say anything to justify their decisions. Making things up as they go along.it was given as he was coming back from an offside position BEFORE the ball was played?
But he was onside unless I’m going blind. There are actively looking to disallow goals it’s bollcksyou can write it every time, but clear and obvious error doesn't involve offside.
It's offside or it isn't offside.
Any part of your body that you can score with, as you can score with your armpit it’s offsideSo, an inconsequential limb was hurting out a few inches past the last body part of a defender, yet the rest of the attacker’s body was behind it. That’s offsides? Any body part beyond that line? That’s fecking insane.
Exactly this. Every time same comments. Is goal regular? No!! So basically people want that irregular goals stand.you can write it every time, but clear and obvious error doesn't involve offside.
It's offside or it isn't offside.
Yeah, I heard that. What a load of nonsense. Isn't like Pukki gets any significant advantage as he was still onside when the ball was actually passed.VAR have said it is because he came back from an offside position. To me it should only be when the ball is actually passed to him. It is infuriating.
I am waiting to witness an armpit goal.Any part of your body that you can score with, as you can score with your armpit it’s offside
An arm can't be offside. A shoulder can.
it was given as he was coming back from an offside position BEFORE the ball was played?