fps
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2018
- Messages
- 6,018
Big big mistake if so.
We need a CM, but a first XI CM. The money on Mount was wasted.
Big big mistake if so.
Kind of have to if we're selling Henderson and DVB. They're where the squad gaps are.
We need a CM, but a first XI CM. The money on Mount was wasted.
There is no such thing as a first XI CM anymore, the amount of games last season alone should tell you that.
Most top teams now have multiple options for positions and play who fits the bill tactically for the opposition.
Whoever we sign will be being signed to play a lot of minutes this season.
He will be waiting a long time thenThink he's waiting for Barca
That’s not true. Don’t tell me if Man City are in a big match that Rodri doesn’t start. Don’t tell me that Casemiro isn’t a first XI midfielder. There is a first choice XI. Others will play a lot, but the big clubs have a best XI and they know what that is.
Considering his age and what he'd cost, I would rather sign Sesko who has a even higher ceiling than Hojlund imo. Why should we be against having two top potential CFs who can fight for a place or even play together? It would give us the tactical versatility to play with two strikers up front. We never had that in the recent years, but remember we once had Rooney, Tevez and Berbatov all playing together.What about Toney as proven goalscorer in this league which takes pressure off Rasmus
Considering his age and what he'd cost, I would rather sign Sesko who has a even higher ceiling than Hojlund imo. Why should we be against having two top potential CFs who can fight for a place or even play together? It would give us the tactical versatility to play with two strikers up front. We never had that in the recent years, but remember we once had Rooney, Tevez and Berbatov all playing together.
Oh there are other options than just the flat 442. 442 diamonds, 4132 or 352 systems are all used by some teams currently (albeit this isn't very common). At least having that option can be valuable, even if it is not the default system to use.But teams just dont play two strikers up top anymore ---- unless the ol' 4-4-2 comes back in vogue.
I cant see us getting the ol' Fergie 4 striker rotation for the foreseeable future.
Oh there are other options than just the flat 442. 442 diamonds, 4132 or 352 systems are all used by some teams currently (albeit this isn't very common). At least having that option can be valuable, even if it is not the default system to use.
Would have been a good shout if only he didnt proclaim himself a massive 'pool fan just the other day.. which would indicate they're working on a deal in the background.. or he's just a bit weird Sesko + recogniser striker would be my pick over Rasmus, but if there is a option of Sesko+Rasmus that could also work well, less pressure on each one and we let them battle it out for the starting spot based on formWhat about Toney as proven goalscorer in this league which takes pressure off Rasmus
Even in a system with 3 forwards, some will have two wide men and a traditional number 9, whilst others will have a playmaker with split strikers either side. There are lots of variations, but we can only try them if we have suitable players.Oh there are other options than just the flat 442. 442 diamonds, 4132 or 352 systems are all used by some teams currently (albeit this isn't very common). At least having that option can be valuable, even if it is not the default system to use.
Sesko's not a bad shout, but I think he will be too expensive for this year. I would rather hijack the Orban deal now, and go for Ferguson in a few years to have three great strikers.Would have been a good shout if only he didnt proclaim himself a massive 'pool fan just the other day.. which would indicate they're working on a deal in the background.. or he's just a bit weird Sesko + recogniser striker would be my pick over Rasmus, but if there is a option of Sesko+Rasmus that could also work well, less pressure on each one and we let them battle it out for the starting spot based on form
If the club can't find a striker before the end of the window we should get Ivan Toney in Jan imo.
Prem proven and give us another option on how to play.
Where is the money coming from though? We can’t sell players now, I’m not sure where we get money from if we can’t afford anyone else this window.
I do like Toney mind.
I see Arsenal are bidding 100M for Evan Ferguson, probably no way we can swing the FFP.
is there anyone that would do a swap deal for Greenwood?
Just call me mystic macIvan Toney.
His Fiorentina time was hugely inflated by pens and a hot finishing run... If you build off it then you can look past it, but with him it looked like a one off hot finishing season among an average to above average striker level.Suddenly no one is interested in Dušan Vlahović's service anymore. Did he do really bad in Juventus?
It's not gone at all, there are clear tiers in terms of minutes played. At least there is a main 8 or so, with 3 starters rotating similarly with 3 top subs. Something like that.You're talking about one off games. The season can be upwards of 60 games. Football is more of a squad game than ever before given the physicality of the game.
Of course teams have preferred players for a position, but the days of signing squad players to make up the numbers and come and do a job incase someone from your ever present XI are injured are long gone.
Whoever we sign will be in the clubs eyes good enough to start games for us. We won't be signing someone who's only ever going to play when someone needs a rest.
Manchester United are reportedly interested in long-time Roma target Marcos Leonardo of Santos.
https://romapress.net/manchester-united-join-roma-in-race-for-marcos-leonardo/#google_vignette
You could say that Brighton have brought the 4-4-2 formation back, and are having significant success with it.But teams just dont play two strikers up top anymore ---- unless the ol' 4-4-2 comes back in vogue.
I cant see us getting the ol' Fergie 4 striker rotation for the foreseeable future.
You could say that Brighton have brought the 4-4-2 formation back, and are having significant success with it.
Toney I was originally against due to us needing top end potential, but now that we have Hojlund, then Toney to rotate and be the other striker with Hojlund is good. He'll be 28 in March, so a decent age to balance Hojlund.
Does he own a bar?What about this Ekitike guy?
What about this Ekitike guy? Is he any good? I’d be okay with another backup striker.
Does he own a bar?
I wonder if we should be looking at Awoniyi? He looked a real handful today - big, powerful, fast and he knows where the net is!
Would be an exciting replacement for Martial if we ship him.