No. Yet that has no relevance to what we are discussing. Our team isn't thriving because we don't have a gelled compatible first team starting cb pairing. We still don't have a starting natural defensive midfielder to help balance the midfield. Plus our attack is comprised of players who not only haven't played together for long. Have had Sancho settling in, Rashford in the worst form of his life and a returning Cr7 trying to hold it together. Whilst Cavani is awol with injury and fate has robbed us of greenwood who could have comfortable addressed Rashford's shocking slump..
As for what we are disccussing. Sancho is flying along side a 37 year old CR7 dropping deep. No ifs buts or maybes. So it makes no sense to claim he'd suddenly be worse of with a Kane type aged 25-29 doing the same things.
Second, its Rashford's awful form that's the issue here. Not having a 9 that drops deep. Sancho will always be the creative wideman who can strethch play with pace if need be. Meaning the winger/wide attacker on the opposite flank should be more direct. Elanga shows what Rashford simply no longer does any more. Greenwood would have shown it better but fate has him out the lime light. It has absolutely nothing to do with needing a speedy, bulldozing 9. Having one would still not compensate for Rashford's awful performances. Nor make us as a team play any better that our squad does now
Not forgetting our biggest problem in attack for years has been not being able to consistently stretch teams on both flanks. We though buying Sancho would address that. But he has just proved another left side attacker. Leaving us still with a mostly dead right flank. Save for when Elanga or Greenwood start with a Dalot.
Rather What we actually need to do is get this current useless Rashford as far away from the team as possible. Sancho has found his niche on the left. Now we need a direct attacker on the opposite wing to him doing the business. Now that we have lost greenwood. We can as well go and sign a Raphinha type as elanga develops
I am not claiming Sancho will be worse off playing alongside Kane - I am saying he will be better alongside a Haaland/ Cavani/ Drogba or a Torres/ Eto'o/ Villa/ Vardy. And I'm saying he won't bring the best out of Kane/ a Kane type. Sancho is not going to be running in behind with the same effectiveness or frequency that Son does.
We are really talking about the same issue - the lack of a willingness to stretch the play and offer a direct, penetrative threat in the front three. Contrary to what you are saying, that doesn't have to come from the right though. Yes, Rashford should be providing some running power and yet he is not, and yes, Elanga has come in and shown the pace, energy and movement that Rashford has been either unwilling or incapable of injecting into the side. The youngster has had a really positive impact precisely because he provides what others in the team do not. So it's very strange to say our issues have nothing to do with not having a 'speedy, bulldozing 9' - it of course does, because our difficulties in stretching the play could be addressed with a conventional central striker. It's not like it would be outside the norm to have a 'proper' no.9, and though there are certainly more recent examples of 'false' 9s like Kane, Ibrahimovic, Berbatov, Firmino or Messi, it's most definitely not the default for that position. For the same reason, it's also untrue that having a traditional striker would not go some way to compensating for Rashford's poor performances - logically it would, as the striker would be providing some of the things Rashford is not and that the side is otherwise lacking. Look at the impact Cavani had when fitness permitted him a run of fixtures last season - he provided the team with another dimension in the same way Elanga has.
Even if we were to go with Elanga, Rashford's form picked up on that side of the pitch or we brought in a shiny new direct right winger, I would still say a player with a more regular interpretation of a centre forwards role would be better for the team than a player, like Kane, who constantly looks to drop into the hole. Even strikers like Lewandowski or Van Nistelrooy, who excelled more with their back to goal during build-up play and who - though they 'could' run in behind - you wouldn't say threatened the space behind the defence consistently, still gave depth to the attack by playing against the centre backs rather than converging on the ball all the time. I would rather the striker left those spaces between the lines for Sancho to move into with or off the ball (and helped create said spaces by stretching the game).
I am also excited by what I have seen of Diallo, and haven't really considered any potential buys for the right wing. I like the prospect of Sancho and Diallo on each wing. Nice symmetry. And I would like us to buy a centre forward to facilitate the use of those two. Simply, like the idea of that more than seeing either Rashford or Elanga on our right side.