Is that Sancho's middle name or something?
It wasn't Sancho who squandered 3 goals in the first half.
Is that Sancho's middle name or something?
Antony is always involved, just his decision making. Sancho, I hardly see him except the weak attempt.
I've finally discovered our problem in the final third. Its called Antony
What an absolutely strange comment when he was the best player of our starting three up front
I'll take Antony over a sancho who would stop and pass the ball backwards every time he gets near the box.That's precisely it. His decision making is very poor, and yet he seems to evade accountability from ETH because he was his expensive nepotism signing.
Being the best of a bad bunch isn't a great recommendation!Which is a sad statement in and of itself given how ineffective he is. We should've been up 3-0 at the half if he made the right decisions.
Which is a sad statement in and of itself given how ineffective he is. We should've been up 3-0 at the half if he made the right decisions.
I've given Antony a lot of grief today but he's always involved. Sancho is a ghostIt wasn't Sancho who squandered 3 goals in the first half.
Or maybe it’s because he’s young and needs to learn that decision making. Caf is way harsh on the guy.That's precisely it. His decision making is very poor, and yet he seems to evade accountability from ETH because he was his expensive nepotism signing.
Sancho can't squander goals because he doesn't even try.It wasn't Sancho who squandered 3 goals in the first half.
I'll take Antony over a sancho who would stop and pass the ball backwards every time he gets near the box.
I think the difference between the two is that ETH is far more likely to drop Sancho than Antony, never mind that we have suitable subs like Garnacho and Pellistri available.
Or maybe it’s because he’s young and needs to learn that decision making. Caf is way harsh on the guy.
Sure that's the difference between the two
You are having a mare here
John Brooks