Cantona in disguise
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2016
- Messages
- 787
That's about it... For 60 milion...
Don't get me wrong I wouldnt have signed him not for 60 million any way. Strange one.
That's about it... For 60 milion...
Yes, this is an isolated incident and everyone is overreactingMan Utd Lost so the CAF is in meltdown! PANIC STATIONS!
Sack EtH. Sack Murtough. All the players bought are crap.
Fold the club.
Yes, this is an isolated incident and everyone is overreacting
What article is this? Have u got a link?They've been reporting all day on Talksport ( I know, I know ) that MG is ready to be offloaded because of the resulting backlash after Crafton's article in The Athletic.
I think that's exactly why he added Mason Mount, because Ten Hag dropped the possession control idea and decided to go all in with the transition football. His targets have clearly shifted from what he wanted last year. His pursuit of DeJong was indicative of his desire to control games but after we acquired Casemiro, Bruno and Rashford proved themselves to be integral players for us, Ten Hag decided to simply go with what would highlight their strengths which is transition football.All the more reason not to add Mason fecking Mount to it. Surely it would make more sense to get someone who compensates for their weaknesses, as opposed to a player who highlights and exacerbates them.
Yes, this is an isolated incident and everyone is overreacting
Think it’s more a case of us looking shit and our transfer window being an obvious failure yet again.
Onana has been great, our new striker hasn't played a game yet and Mount was far from our worst player today.
I think most are criticising players' performances. I don't see "meltdown" or much manager baiting: most are simply venting because we were shite for 50% of the game.Normal person?! Large portion of the forum is in meltdown!
De GeaI wonder who of this bunch is going to end up as our player of the year at the end of this season. Thinking about this is fascinating.
Saying mount wasnt our worst player is hardly a ringing endorsement. The main point to make with him is that with the money we spent on him we could have got a player who massively improved the team e.g. a proper 8Onana has been great, our new striker hasn't played a game yet and Mount was far from our worst player today.
Honestly if they just made better decisions in the attacking areas we’d score more goals. Garnacho and Antony both had the ball in dangerous areas and mostly made the wrong decision.
We need the forwards to have their heads up and look for each other more and when they do get the ball maybe don’t drill it straight into a defenders shins.
It mostly feels like we have a very dumb group of attackers. Spurs were wide open first half and yet it felt like our attackers were all just desperate to get their first goals of the season rather than actually making the right play.
You know it's bad when Chelsea let him go to us. Never been a top player.All the more reason not to add Mason fecking Mount to it. Surely it would make more sense to get someone who compensates for their weaknesses, as opposed to a player who highlights and exacerbates them.
Shite finishing, unfit, panicky.
Martinez was appalling in that 2nd half. When he wasn't trying to play their forwards on side and scoring own goals he was launching long balls into touch when there were simple short passes on.
Greenwood getting the boot is the biggest positive I can think of right nowWorse than last year. Totally out of balance. Not sure Mount and Fernandez work in that system. Antony garbage, Rashford not a central striker. Garnacho - impact sub only. Fecking wank. And I hear Greenwood is getting to boot. fecking shit show!!
I love your optimismMy new hope for the season is to scrape top four and make it out of the CL group. That would be success with this lot.
Saying mount wasnt our worst player is hardly a ringing endorsement. The main point to make with him is that with the money we spent on him we could have got a player who massively improved the team e.g. a proper 8
Don't get me wrong I wouldnt have signed him not for 60 million any way. Strange one.
No, I didn't. I agree with you. Atm. it really looks like we've spent 60 million for a Bruno's sub.
And btw. Bruno plays 95% of the games
Onana was a good signing, Hojland seems overpriced but could turn out to be a good signing but mount is just a horrible use of limited funds when we were desperate for an 8 and I just don't see how it will work out. Even if he does improve spending that much on a player who hadn't played well for over a year and who no one else was in for seems dubiousI mean, I'd give it more than 2 games before writing the transfer window off.
Michael Oliver