SwansonsTache
incontinent sexual deviant & German sausage lover
Anyone have the post match interviews with Mourinho?
Think thats the 17th time Pep and Jose teams have played against one another.
Pep 8 wins
Jose 3 wins and 6 draws.
Just saying....
I disagree.Really has nothing to do with today though … just saying!
We needed an extra man in midfield today. It was fine in the previous games as the opposition was not as good. Today we were playing local rivals and rivals for the title. He should have realised that.
Nope, no names mentioned.Hope he didn't name the players... too early in the season for that
You seem to mistake me for a Mourinho apologist. Even if we had defended better today and a couple of our counters worked, I would have thought this was unacceptable for us. My point is not that Mourinho couldn't do any better, it is that there was no "outwitting". You seem to agree with this yourself when you say that he knew how Pep will set up. To me being outwitted implies an element of surprise, some sort of cunning plan that your opponent could not see so I was arguing that this did not happen.I can't agree with that at all. Mourinho knew that City would play the likes of Silva and De Bruyne in pockets of space behind the defence. They've played the same formation all season.
We should have set up accordingly to combat them.
Well, City have a knack for finishing teams of in the first half. They're going to have to do just that against most teams.They are better at the moment as you say, only slightly. If we had played the first half like the seconds intensity, then it might have been different. I have said before, there is no saying they will be able to keep that tempo and pressing up for a season and we might be the team who still have legs at the end.
Yeah right. We would have won our games with 10 men on the field. Fellaini is not a Manchester United midfielder. If you have to play him then play the fecking elbowing muppet upfrontOk genius we were unbeaten until now with Fellaini in the midfield. Take your tinted glasses off, he was one of our best players on the pitch today.
I thought José was meant to be a master tactician? Got it terribly wrong here.
I knew we made a mistake going for him instead of Pep.
Also, the number of times Sane had the ball in acres of space on the right. Imagine us getting Martial in that kind of space. That's shows you how much better City were. We were largely hoping to score and someone to do something. City genuinely had us on the ropes when they attacked.Agreed.How KdB's effort that hit the inside of the post in the second half stayed out is beyond me.
Yeah right. We would have won our games with 10 men on the field. Fellaini is not a Manchester United midfielder. If you have to play him then play the fecking elbowing muppet upfront
im not sure if it was just an extra man, we needed some one who was happy just to just sit and protect the back four... that isnt Fellaini or Pogba.We needed an extra man in midfield today. It was fine in the previous games as the opposition was not as good. Today we were playing local rivals and rivals for the title. He should have realised that.
Depends who he means as well. Mhki and Lingard's performances, especially Jesse's were not that surprising. That was down to him for picking them. I would imagine he was especially disappointed with Blind and Pogba and if he dares Ibra.Nope, no names mentioned.
Also, the number of times Sane had the ball in acres of space on the right. Imagine us getting Martial in that kind of space. That's shows you how much better City were. We were largely hoping to score and someone to do something. City genuinely had us on the ropes when they attacked.
In fairness on an individual level, we have more better players that them, position for position.
Was surprised about Mou's turtling approach in the first half. He played fully into Guardiolas cards by doing so. The soaking up pressure method doesn't work against a Guardiola side, and inevitably leads into conceding.
Mou made the right calls going into the 2nd half to gain more stability, but the game was already lost by then.
What was pretty obvious is the apparent lack of cohesion, clear movement patterns and syncronization between between the squad segments compared to City. Guardiola clearly transmitted more of his football idea than Mourinho did so far.
I think mainly lingard, Micky and blind.Depends who he means as well. Mhki and Lingard's performances, especially Jesse's were not that surprising. That was down to him for picking them. I would imagine he was especially disappointed with Blind and Pogba and if he dares Ibra.
im not sure if it was just an extra man, we needed some one who was happy just to just sit and protect the back four... that isnt Fellaini or Pogba.
Not getting at either player, but that isnt their game
They did because of the tactics. First half we just let them do whatever the feck they wanted and Silva and KDB ripped us apart. Second half, they played on the counter but didn't really control the midfield.No, you don't, and it became pretty clear today. Better in terms of physicality, maybe. Still that didn't prevent Silva and De Bruyne to act as they saw fit.
On an overall footballing skill level, City looked much better today.
Mourinho's teams are about individuality up front. He works on getting the team solid and leaving the attacking to individuals. This is a very British trait which is one of the reasons we regularly see our front creative players being nullified time and time again. Guardiola works much more on creating space through movement for the attacking players to exploit and unlike LvG, he is very very good at it which is why when his teams are on song, there is no stopping them.Also, the number of times Sane had the ball in acres of space on the right. Imagine us getting Martial in that kind of space. That's shows you how much better City were. We were largely hoping to score and someone to do something. City genuinely had us on the ropes when they attacked.
That os actully Jose's philosophy, the less time you have the ball the less mistake you make.
That's my point. City having those 3 on 2/4 on 3 situations just highlighted how much in control of this football match they were. The only thing close about it was the shots at goal and the scoreline. They were, otherwise, in terms of quality of football and control of proceedings, easily the better team.But a lot of that was because we were going hell for leather and playing 1 on 1 in the defense. It's what the game demanded. By and large (apart from the KDB shot) our 3 man urgency defense (Hererra, Blind and Bailly) did a good job. Only if Blind was switched on like that in the first half, the game would have been different.
Bravo is much better than this. First game in a new league is all.
Like your vowels.Pogba shld have done much much more. He just disappeared.
Game wasn't lost by then. We got lucky and scored at the end of the first half which gave us a whole half to equalize. Tactics weren't even that bad to begin with in the first half but who would have thought that Lingard and Mkhitaryan would under preform like that?
Most of those matches were when Pep was in charge of arguably the greatest football team of all time. Obviously he played a significant part in making them that good, but it's foolish to ignore how 'lucky' he was with the personnel he had to work with.Think thats the 17th time Pep and Jose teams have played against one another.
Pep 8 wins
Jose 3 wins and 6 draws.
Just saying....
That's my point. City having those 3 on 2/4 on 3 situations just highlighted how much in control of this football match they were. The only thing close about it was the shots at goal and the scoreline. They were, otherwise, in terms of quality of football and control of proceedings, easily the better team.
And I also don't think one mistake by one player was the difference. Maybe we could have lucked out in another scenario. But in general they were comfortably better than us, as was Pep than Jose, and the team that deserved to win, did.
but who do you play at the base of the 3?Indeed.
We should have started in a 4-3-3, which is easy to say with the benefit of hindsight, but I've felt this formation would suit us best ever since we acquired the services of Paul Pogba.
They did because of the tactics. First half we just let them do whatever the feck they wanted and Silva and KDB ripped us apart. Second half, they played on the counter but didn't really control the midfield.
Fellaini certainly worked hard today. As you say trying to do two mens jobs. That extra man in there, would have helped him and Paul would have been able to concentrate on attacking knowing there was plenty of cover behind him. We were wide open.Well, City have a knack for finishing teams of in the first half. They're going to have to do just that against most teams.
As for us, there's no point in having fresh legs if we don't use them. We need high intensity players on the grass not on the bench. Ander-Pogba-Fellaini/Morgan should be the template for our midfield
This might be a knee-jerk comment but Pogba was lazy today. Fellaini can't do it all himself.
They weren't wrong. We just had 3 players failing to implement them which was costly. Mikhi, Rooney and Lingard were supposed to lead the high press to stop City building from the back and to hold on to the ball and give us outlets whenever Fellaini and Pogba for back the ball. They were woeful at both. All three were moving slower than Mata carrying a knock, allowing City to build attack after attack with a head of steam in acres of Space at the back. To top it all none of them could keep the ball.Agree, though what about Mourinho's tactics in the first half?
Deserve failure when we start Lingard, Rooney and Fellaini over Martial, Rashford and Schneiderlin.
Mark Clattenburg