croadyman
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 38,817
If we won we would be 5 behind Arsenal (1 game in hand) and 3 behind City. Winning yesterday would absolutely have put us in a title contention.
We aren't ready to CHALLENGE yet
If we won we would be 5 behind Arsenal (1 game in hand) and 3 behind City. Winning yesterday would absolutely have put us in a title contention.
I would be amazed if it wasn’t. Although xG is often misleading so can’t rule it out. Have a look online for the various minute by minute reports. Look at the half time summary’s. You’ll see an overwhelming consensus that the two teams were evenly matched at that point. It was the second half where it got away from us.
Technically you are correct in what you say.
But how often have we seen posts like this where the poster will say, "We are only 6 months into Jose/Ole/ETH's reign"?
Then a year or 2 later, the manager gets fired and we have to start again?
By having this mentality we will be trophyless for another 10 years at least.
If a manager joins Chelsea/MCFC/Madrid, etc, he is expected to have instant impact.
The days when a manager can expect to lose for 3 years straight at a big club are gone.
ETH will need to win trophies next season, at the latest or he too will be fired.
I know my standards are high, but given that we have one of the biggest budgets in World football, it is staggering how easily we accept losing.
Fecking spare me from xG obsessives. There’s a hell of a lot more to judging a football match than fecking xG.
Picture this. Two teams play out a match which is evenly matched for an hour, with neither side creating many clearcut chances. Then one of the two teams finishes strongly and creates a bunch of decent chances, which gives them a high xG. That is not the same thing as that team “battering” the other team.
Actually, no need to picture it. Just try to remember last night’s game….
and that is away against a side that is being hailed as champions elect and has just broken 50 pts for half a season.Agree with @Pogue Mahone here, xG or whatever that is doesn't tell the story here. At the end of the first half I felt the sides were evenly matched based on what I saw. The reason we lost this one was down to three primary things:
1. Fatigue. Arsenal were more rested and we simply ran out of gas towards the end. ETH tried to bring more energy on the pitch with the Fred substitution, but it didn't work.
2. Casemiro. The moment he got the yellow card in the last game we lost this one IMO. The drop off in quality in our midfield is staggering when he is not there. We would not have been dominated to the extent we were in the second half with him in the pitch, nor would we have looked as vulnerable.
3. VAR. If some 50-50 decisions had gone our way things could have been different.
Overall there is lots to be positive about, yes we were "battered" in the last 20 minutes but it doesn't paint the whole picture or is a reflection of the entire game. The squad we have still has too many cracks to be able to cope with a loss like Casemiro and also deal with keeping players rested in fresh. On this latter point I would like to see ETH rotate more and make earlier substitutions. Casemiro should have been taken off in the last game to save him for this one for example.
In case you missed it, Thierry Henry pretty much sang our praises and summed up the situation between the two teams quite well.
Agree. The Manager is doing OK, but he made some poor calls this week. Coupled with the 'we're not ready to compete for the title' mentality still prevalent in the squad. Shaw comments about the team back peddling was classic given he spent most of the match doing exactly that faced with Saka. United team are about 3 years older than Arsenal, this lot will never be 'ready to compete'.Technically you are correct in what you say.
But how often have we seen posts like this where the poster will say, "We are only 6 months into Jose/Ole/ETH's reign"?
Then a year or 2 later, the manager gets fired and we have to start again?
By having this mentality we will be trophyless for another 10 years at least.
If a manager joins Chelsea/MCFC/Madrid, etc, he is expected to have instant impact.
The days when a manager can expect to lose for 3 years straight at a big club are gone.
ETH will need to win trophies next season, at the latest or he too will be fired.
I know my standards are high, but given that we have one of the biggest budgets in World football, it is staggering how easily we accept losing.
Ye exactly this. Now we were probably happy with the draw so explains our negativity. But it wasn't a close game in my view.Arsenal: 24 shots, 2.90 xG.
United: 5 shots, 0.27 xG.
Which tells the same story as the eye-test: They battered us, we produced very little.
Arsenal had 24 shots, from low scoring chances (other than the Nketiah shot that hit DdG) what other clear cut chances did they have?Arsenal: 24 shots, 2.90 xG.
United: 5 shots, 0.27 xG.
Which tells the same story as the eye-test: They battered us, we produced very little.
The fact I’m yet to hear this properly addressed by pundits is what annoys me most. They throw us in to some ‘title race’ then when a vastly more settled squad scrape a 3-2 act surprised.The 90min winner was a killer, Ramsgate makes a great save otherwise we go 2-3 . Small margins in big games, also injuries and suspension play a part in league season, we were without Casimero, Dalot Martial imo those 3 would have made a difference. It also highlights the need for players in summer.
Eth has been here 6mth or so, Arteta is in his 3rd season, and some on here are pissed we didn't win , I'm pissed but there is a bigger picture its improvement in a short time, and if we'd got 3pts v Palace it wouldn't have been a bitter pill.
Next game is now the biggest one then the next then the one after that, this result shouldn't derail a decent 6 mths .
Yes good sensible postVery even sides in general, 3-1 for us first game, now 3-2 for them. Fair results both. Such a high quality modern football.
Obviously I don't know the specifics but given Eriksen's medical history I suspect that he is taking a beta-blocker. This medication would sap his energy. We should be playing him because of his undoubted ability but recognize that he may only have 70 mins in the tank and plan accordingly.Eriksen has played too much football and doesn’t have the legs when we concede majority possession
He is sensible most of the times. Aside from when he was blaming Chicharito for not celebrating with Ronaldo when Chicha scored a goal in CL.Theirry Henry:
“Today, we saw a team with three years development vs a team with six months. Also, a team with a full week of rest against a team with two days rest, and still Manchester United went toe to toe, which was surprising. I thought Arsenal would be all over United from kick-off and United’s players would sit back. I was wrong. United in fact had better control in the first half.
I'm proud of the team and Ten Hag. Was annoying we couldn't come away with at least a point but considering above comments from Henry, its great progress.
In 3 years we should be twatting teams left and right.
I'd been saying that from the moment Casemiro got booked at Palacewould have preferred martinez in midfield instead if mctominay yesterday, at least we would have had a proper warrior battling in midfield and a far better passer as well and then had shaw in defence again with malacia at ĺeft back.
Theirry Henry:
“Today, we saw a team with three years development vs a team with six months. Also, a team with a full week of rest against a team with two days rest, and still Manchester United went toe to toe, which was surprising. I thought Arsenal would be all over United from kick-off and United’s players would sit back. I was wrong. United in fact had better control in the first half.
I'm proud of the team and Ten Hag. Was annoying we couldn't come away with at least a point but considering above comments from Henry, its great progress.
In 3 years we should be twatting teams left and right.
Arsenal: 24 shots, 2.90 xG.
United: 5 shots, 0.27 xG.
Which tells the same story as the eye-test: They battered us, we produced very little.
I think he most definitely has a part to play (you only have to look at how many chances created/assists he has). I have no issue with him in a two against ‘lesser’ opposition, however, he was pretty much bypassed in both the city and Arsenal games. His lack of athleticism combined with Bruno not looking after the ball, it’s a bad mix in these sort of games.Obviously I don't know the specifics but given Eriksen's medical history I suspect that he is taking a beta-blocker. This medication would sap his energy. We should be playing him because of his undoubted ability but recognize that he may only have 70 mins in the tank and plan accordingly.
I think our progress is encouraging and should stand us in good stead when we go to the market for new players. A year ago (or less) we were a team with no direction "lead" by an old player with a huge ego. Now we look like an attractive option for ambitious young players.
Kind of shows why xG is a stupid stat if you don't know how to use it.
We didn't have Casemiro so ETH set us up to break up play and counter. We didn't set out to keep the ball in midfield and have multiple speculative shots from nowhere like Arsenal did. Doesn't look good on the xG stats, but it fit perfectly with our tactic and save for a fluke goal in minute 90 it worked.
Nobody could have watched that game and not been impressed with us, and a little disappointed with Arsenal.
Kind of shows why xG is a stupid stat if you don't know how to use it.
We didn't have Casemiro so ETH set us up to break up play and counter. We didn't set out to keep the ball in midfield and have multiple speculative shots from nowhere like Arsenal did. Doesn't look good on the xG stats, but it fit perfectly with our tactic and save for a fluke goal in minute 90 it worked.
Nobody could have watched that game and not been impressed with us, and a little disappointed with Arsenal.
His game management is a bit sus atm, ngl.We lost a game of football to a team that outplayed us on the day while missing the linchpin of our midfield. There’s no need for an inquest…
…that said, why did ETH wait so long to bring on Garnacho, and eventually not use 3 subs available? If we’re holding on for the whistle, taking time off the clock and energy out of the game is a valid tactic.
I'd argue that Ten Hag is just finding first hand how physicaly taxing the Premier League is. He probably can get away with little rotating in Eredivisie, but he can't do that here.His game management is a bit sus atm, ngl.
Oh, come on. It's not like anyone's putting up the xG as the catch-all Single Final Big Proof that we were shit and Arsenal were great, overruling a lot of conflicting information. The point, made repeatedly, is that xG, shots, touchmaps (Arsenal had 59 touches in our penalty area, we had 11 in theirs. Tomiyasu, a defensive FB who played half the game, had more than any of our players) and eye-test all tell the same story, which is that they subjected us to very heavy offensive pressure, while we did not produce very much in the way of scoring chances. There are clear limits to what xG tells you about a single game, but when it's this disparate, and the shots are equally disparate, and the touchmap tell the same story, and when it was an obvious feature of the game while it was going on that we struggled to control them when they were in possession around our box (for my part I was worried enough about that that I made a post in the match thread about it during the break), what exactly is the point here? That Arsenal were taking lots of speculative shots while we produced fewer but more high-quality chances? Because we really didn't (and of course, if we did, that would also have showed up in the xG). These were the five finishes with the biggest scoring chance of the game:
1. Nketiah (90) 0.61 (Arsenal's third goal)
2. Nketiah (84) 0.47
3. Nketiah (24) 0.42 (Arsenal's first goal)
4. Ødegaard (2) 0.17
5. Nketiah (64) 0.17
We didn't have a single chance that even reached the 0.10 threshold.
Also, I think you'll find that possession was actually about even after the first half. Which is probably one of the reasons this still felt like a close game, and which also contradicts the notion that this was a game where we were happy to sit back and let them have the ball.
So yeah, it was close and we fought well and we've showed progress and there's no reason to hang our heads over this game. But there just isn't a reasonable way of looking at this game that leads you to something other than Arsenal outperforming us big time when it came to generating offense. We didn't produce much, they produced a lot.
I would disagree with that last sentence. We were impressive in the first half. Arsenal were impressive for 90 minutes. I don’t think anyone would be disappointed with them. In fact, that was arguably their most impressive performance of the season.
Well that's kind of what you just said...
Tbh I feel that you guys are always one of our toughest opponents and for a long time we’ve had a mental block with you. I’m not surprised you’re the only team to beat us so far and I would have been happy with a draw here. Kind of like our win vs Liverpool earlier in the season, even though Liverpool weren’t in great form I still expected to drop points. They’ve thrashed us so frequently in recent years.Considering the results and plaudits they've been getting I was expecting more from them, considering we are far from the finished article, our most important player was missing, and we were at their ground. We matched them for 89 minutes. I expected them to control us better.
Tbh I feel that you guys are always one of our toughest opponents and for a long time we’ve had a mental block with you. I’m not surprised you’re the only team to beat us so far and I would have been happy with a draw here. Kind of like our win vs Liverpool earlier in the season, even though Liverpool weren’t in great form I still expected to drop points. They’ve thrashed us so frequently in recent years.
But I’d have to disagree that you matched us for 89 minutes - you matched us for about 70. Last 20 minutes you seemed happy with the draw and only one team looked like scoring. We also had one of our most important players in Jesus missing, but thankfully Nketiah has exceeded most people’s expectations so far.
Sorry, but are you taking the piss here or what? That is exactly what I have repeatedly and explicitly been clear is NOT what I'm saying. xG, eye test, touch map, shots - they all tell the same story.
Yet they needed a keeper error and a deflection to get ahead of us. The eye test suggested evenly matched sides playing different tactics. That's where everybody is questioning you.
Yet they needed a keeper error and a deflection to get ahead of us. The eye test suggested evenly matched sides playing different tactics. That's where everybody is questioning you.
Anthony Taylor