McGrathsipan
Dawn’s less famous husband
We beat them on aggregate over two games in the league.
Progress.
Progress.
Arsenal 3 years into their development, us only 6 months into ours. We had a tough away game midweek after just playing City and we still kept the runaway leaders at 2 - 2 at their ground and only lost because of the way that ball bounced up in the penalty area. Yes we rode our luck before that but that is understandable given the personnel we still lack in certain areas and the overall circumstances (and obviously no Case).
All things considered I'm pretty calm and happy. The aim for ETH was Top 4 (at a push) and good football. We are now comfortably top 4 and the squad is clearly still full of players Ten Hag doesn't exactly want but is still getting a tune out of. The fact that we even competed in a ding dong battle between two top table teams is something we'd have loved to be doing the last few years. Perspective is needed badly for some people on here.
Thank-you, I thought it was just me that feels like this. Some very harsh criticisms flying around here.Arsenal 3 years into their development, us only 6 months into ours. We had a tough away game midweek after just playing City and we still kept the runaway leaders at 2 - 2 at their ground and only lost because of the way that ball bounced up in the penalty area. Yes we rode our luck before that but that is understandable given the personnel we still lack in certain areas and the overall circumstances (and obviously no Case).
All things considered I'm pretty calm and happy. The aim for ETH was Top 4 (at a push) and good football. We are now comfortably top 4 and the squad is clearly still full of players Ten Hag doesn't exactly want but is still getting a tune out of. The fact that we even competed in a ding dong battle between two top table teams is something we'd have loved to be doing the last few years. Perspective is needed badly for some people on here.
Squad depth and fatigue did for us, the difference of a midweek game, no Casemiro, were big factors for 60 minutes Arsenal edged it but not by much would expect this from the home side who are running away with the league.... am more disappointed dropping points at Palace than a tight game at Arsenal
Arsenal 3 years into their development, us only 6 months into ours. We had a tough away game midweek after just playing City and we still kept the runaway leaders at 2 - 2 at their ground and only lost because of the way that ball bounced up in the penalty area. Yes we rode our luck before that but that is understandable given the personnel we still lack in certain areas and the overall circumstances (and obviously no Case).
All things considered I'm pretty calm and happy. The aim for ETH was Top 4 (at a push) and good football. We are now comfortably top 4 and the squad is clearly still full of players Ten Hag doesn't exactly want but is still getting a tune out of. The fact that we even competed in a ding dong battle between two top table teams is something we'd have loved to be doing the last few years. Perspective is needed badly for some people on here.
I wish Rashford would tell Griphook to feck off. When people talk about Rashford's awful season last year I never see his experience with England during the preceeding summer mentioned as a factor. Barely used all tournament and then brought on cold and expected to score a penalty in England's first final in 56 years. Then had to deal with the fact that he missed, the horrendous racial abuse, shoulder surgery, and the clusterfeck that was United on and off the field last season. Fast forward 18 months and Southgate drops him like a stone after performing brilliantly in the WC group stages. United > England every day of the week.Southgate - just the knowledge that he was watching trying to work out which one of Saka/Rashford he can still drop so his mate Sterling can play.
Lads we got played off the park. An amazing goal softened the blow. I'd be worried if anyone was happy with our performance.
Lads we got played off the park. An amazing goal softened the blow. I'd be worried if anyone was happy with our performance.
I'm more annoyed about this result/late goal then the Palace one weirdly.
Palace one I chalked up to "one of those things" - a late worldie, what can you do.
This one, after literally conceding a late goal 4 days ago it's gutting to do so again, especially when it's both a bit jammy, and also totally avoidable.
Plus we didn't really deserve anything from this game, so to knick a point would have been great.
It felt a lot less avoidable in this match to me. In fact, the goal felt inevitable. It was actually crazy how long they took to make the most of all that dominance at the end of the game.
I tend to agree with you. I think Garnacho should have came on around the 80th minute mark when we were under the cosh. We needed an outlet and the only one we had was Rashford. But at the same time our players lacked composure in the last 15 mins. There were a couple of times when they could have passed to Rashford but just hoofed it clearIts bollocks mate. (I'm not attacking you just giving you my POV) It wasnt Antonys absence he was quite absent hymself. It was the fact that ETH went with Fred (while having both McTominay and Eriksen on the pitch) instead of young Garancho that seald our faith. There was no wide players except Rashford who could carry the ball in the face of relentless Arsenal pressure. We might have lost with Garancho offcourse but at least we would have a counter or two with him.
I wouldn't call the defence leaky. When you're defending for twice the time you should as a top team, you're bound to concede more.We were a VAR decision away against City, bottled Palace and now this. It was overdue, people should not act surprised. Casemiro is masking a very average set of midfielders and maybe even a leaky defense. Rashford is carrying a non existent attack and it's been the story of most of the season.
Lads we got played off the park. An amazing goal softened the blow. I'd be worried if anyone was happy with our performance.
Not really. First 5 minutes and final 20 aside, we were pretty level with them. While we did score a bit of a wondergoal to take the lead, so did they, and it was defensive sloppiness and tiring players which allowed them to take the three points.
Haven't read the thread so I'm sure you are right, as I agree with everything you said re progress and mitigating circumstances.Perspective is needed badly for some people on here.
Arsenal: 24 shots, 2.90 xG.
United: 5 shots, 0.27 xG.
Which tells the same story as the eye-test: They battered us, we produced very little.
Haven't read the thread so I'm sure you are right, as I agree with everything you said re progress and mitigating circumstances.
It still pissed me off not to see us have a go in the last twenty minutes. In a top four context the point wasn't much to lose, and in an outside chance of challenging for the league getting all three was everything.
We chose the point for the top four battle. I don't care about being left empty handed, I just know the United of old would have had a go, maybe lost 4-2 instead, and that would be fine by me.
Fecking spare me from xG obsessives. There’s a hell of a lot more to judging a football match than fecking xG.
Picture this. Two teams play out a match which is evenly matched for an hour, with neither side creating many clearcut chances. Then one of the two teams finishes strongly and creates a bunch of decent chances, which gives them a high xG. That is not the same thing as that team “battering” the other team.
Actually, no need to picture it. Just try to remember last night’s game….
Yeah well, I could reply fecking spare me from xG refuseniks, but the point is the xG tells pretty much the same story as everything else in this case. They had more than 20 touches inside our box, f.e. And five times as many shots. And from my recollection of last night's game, we didn't create a lot of scoring chances and spent quite a lot of the game under dire pressure in our own box.
Fantastic game overall for the neutrals. United, although second best showed glimpses of what they are building towards.
I just want to mention that Zinchenko was an absolute monster today. A cheat code - essentially a modern CM playing LB.
I feel this is what we wanted to do with Martinez initially, as he has the ability to ping delightful balls, and has the tenacity and stamina to replicate Zinchenko. Heck, even Pep is doing the same and allowing Lewis a free role in the RB position.
This touch map is insane. I suspect that’s why many of you felt like we were playing with an extra man. It’s true to an extent during the intense start of the game (before we faded) and towards the end of the second half.
Great game overall, can’t beat a classic fixture.
Arsenal, both players and fans, just cannot win without setting up themselves to look like clowns the next time we play them.Saka and his mate were mocking Rashford?
Ohh, Karma do your thing…
If by “quite a lot” you mean the last 20-30 minutes then I agree. And that was my point. A football match lasts 90 minutes and xG can be skewed by events which occur in a minority of that timeframe.
I don't think that's accurate, actually. It was true also of long stretches of the first half. I've not seen a breakdown of how xG or other indicators distributed over the course of the game, but I would be very suprised if that disparity clustered primarily in the last half-hour. I do recall shots at half-time were more or less half the final total.
I think maybe the closeness of the score masked things a bit. It felt like a close game (and of course in terms of goals, it was).
It was good to see the fixture mean something again, been too long in that regard for both clubs.
I'm not too bothered by the result as we weren't challenging for the title anyway. Secure top 4, maybe a domestic cup, and move on with year 2 of ETH rebuild.
Arsenal 3 years into their development, us only 6 months into ours. We had a tough away game midweek after just playing City ...
Technically you are correct in what you say.
But how often have we seen posts like this where the poster will say, "We are only 6 months into Jose/Ole/ETH's reign"?
Then a year or 2 later, the manager gets fired and we have to start again?
By having this mentality we will be trophyless for another 10 years at least.
If a manager joins Chelsea/MCFC/Madrid, etc, he is expected to have instant impact.
The days when a manager can expect to lose for 3 years straight at a big club are gone.
ETH will need to win trophies next season, at the latest or he too will be fired.
I know my standards are high, but given that we have one of the biggest budgets in World football, it is staggering how easily we accept losing.
Anthony Taylor