Tony247
Full Member
- Joined
- May 2, 2018
- Messages
- 10,124
I voted for Ole and I did it not because I got carried away. We all are talking about taking calculated risk irrespective of whatever manager you choose. And I took calculated risk by choosing Ole because I think it is riskier to choose anybody else at this moment.Or I'm not willing to get carried away based on a string consecutive wins.
For me about Ole
1. attacking philosophy - checked
2. overall performance improvement - checked
3. tactical flexibility - checked
4. people management - I am willing to gamble
value added plus
1. knows the club inside out.
2. his deputies too know the club inside out
3. creates positive atmosphere
Why I think Poch is now riskier AFTER we discovered Ole:
1. No matter how Spurs are performing, they are still way too smaller club than Man Utd. Expectation here is to win every match, win all trophies possible. But that is not the case with Spurs. So Poch is carrying much less burden of pressure at Spurs. I was willing to gamble on this until I saw Ole. Now I don't want to.
2. Spurs always played free flow, attacking football even before Poch took over in 2014. They were hanging there near top 4 or in top 4. Lets take a look
2010: 4th. 70 pt
2011: 5th. 62 pt
2012: 4th. 69 pt
2013: 5th. 72 pt
2014: 6th. 69 pt
---- now Poch took over
2015: 5th. 64 pt
2016: 3rd. 70 pt
2017: 2nd. 86 pt
2018: 3rd. 77 pt
So his first two seasons were same as before. Kane was in form of his life in 2017. But lets give some credit to Poch too.
What I am trying to say is there is a philosophy within Spurs which is protected by their board and chairman. Poch or no Poch, they will play the same football. If not Poch they will find somebody else who will do that for them. There is a reason why they produce good strikers after strikers. They get players like that, they train like that. Poch or no Poch.
So, If we have found our own Poch, no sorry, our own ROlex then why look elsewhere? We'll see what to do if and when things go awry.