Coutinho had 5.5M Instagram followers in that video but he has 7.4M in real life so wonder how old the video is.Yeah, really strange times
Coutinho had 5.5M Instagram followers in that video but he has 7.4M in real life so wonder how old the video is.Yeah, really strange times
But it's the Oil clubs we need to beat to win trophies.I partly agree, but then again that would apply to basically every other club as well, apart from the oil clubs. Financially United are still top dogs when it comes to the rest of the pack. And the oil clubs can't buy every single top player in the world.
If Mbappe is worth 150m, then Coutinho is comfortably worth 142m.
Yes. But that was 36 mil then. When that was still a massive fee for a first teamer. It was a gigantic fee for a relative unknown.
I always thought the Bale fee was overpriced. It sounds weird now. But there was a time when the fees we see now weren't even plausible.
I like your plan.I would add a #freeKane
But it's the Oil clubs we need to beat to win trophies.
Especially the big one(UCL) which PSG and City have set their evil eyes on.
Just answered my own question. Last pic Coutinho posted on Instagram in that video was submitted on August 8th so they made it between then and the summer window closing. Must have been close.Coutinho had 5.5M Instagram followers in that video but he has 7.4M in real life so wonder how old the video is.
Shite that he' gone in January and removed himself from the Champions League but at least it' at the beginning of the month and we have adequate time to spend the money (un)wisely. Lemar is an obvious target but we could sort the GK out now as well. Does Oblak have a buy out clause?
They would have done it regardless.To be fair there's a bit of shit going on with the Holgate-Firmino sitaution so they'd probably rather give some of their own twaddle to the media.
Then, that's a very good deal for Barcelona.The fees is 106m plus addons which are trophy related and appearances related.
Coutinho had 5.5M Instagram followers in that video but he has 7.4M in real life so wonder how old the video is.
They would have done it regardless.
Again, 50 mil for a 19 year old unknown was a gigantic fee . See it in the context of the time. Before Pogba and Neymar. Prices like that affect other prices.Martial was £36m, with 2 clauses of £7m each likely to be hit taking the total to £50m in the future. Hardly crazy and comprable to Sterling and Torres in previous years.
Pogba was what, £90m? Similar to Ronaldo, Suarez and Bale, and a fair bit cheaper than what Neymar actually cost Barca. Not expensive or out of the norm at all for one of the best midfielders in the world, and young at that.
The ones that have skewed the market are PSG. We're nowhere near as guilty as them - our transfers have largely still been normal. Them spending £200m on Neymar and £160m on Mbappe has caused Barca to have a surplus of cash, leading to it being branded about now for Coutinho etc. Personally I believe once all PSG money's been used up by each receiving club, we'll return to the top players being sold for around £100m.
Modern times, eh.
Bollocks that was Neymar.That transfer played a part in this current mess we see now though.
Always some twat that wants 5 mins of fameBollocks that was Neymar.
shirt burning
Again, 50 mil for a 19 year old unknown was a gigantic fee . See it in the context of the time. Before Pogba and Neymar. Prices like that affect other prices.
Neymar cost Barca much more than that. Way more. Lots of shoddy money there.
My point isn't to say we are the most guilty. But we are big time players too. Non oil clubs like Barca and Madrid too.
Bale isnt worth £45MThey'll sell Bale for £90M to us. Hazard will only have two years on his contract so if he refuses to sign a new deal, Chelsea will find it tough to hold out for that record fee and will end up having to sell for something in the region of €160-180M.
You're right, they have largely stayed away from massive signings but if Hazard is who Zidane wants, that is who they'll try and get.
And there's no way Klopp said all that. His English isn't that good.
They might actually buy some decent players with that money under Klopp.
The Sane deal was after. So it just followed in the same trend. Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying we shouldn't have signed Martial. Just saying the price was a bit too steep.It wasn't a cheap deal but at the same time it wasn't that huge either imo since City paid the same for Sane later and no one spoke much about it.
Problem with that Martial deal that it seemed like a panic transfer at the last deal because we sold most of our forwards. I don't think Ed even tried to negotiate the price. He was just trying to finish it quickly before the window shut down. I don't blame him much.
Bale at this time was overpriced, yes. I think that's the transfer that started everything. When the most expensive player is 100m you'll expect cheap ones to be 30m, the middle ones to be 40-50m and the elite players to be 70-80. Pogba's transfer didn't add much to that as it kept on the same range but Neymar's one led to the bubble bursting.
The idiot almost burned himself too.Official Barca video — 800k views. Some noname burning his shirt — almost 150k![]()
The Sane deal was after. So it just followed in the same trend. Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying we shouldn't have signed Martial. Just saying the price was a bit too steep.
I agree about the Neymar fee and had hoped it would spur UEFA and others into action..but they are toothless dogs