The country has seemed stunned today. So very sad.
Here's the thing though - the short pitched fast delivery is deliberately intended solely to make the batsman fear for his safety. Cricket allows and encourages it. He may play a rash shot or fend it off unsuccessfully and get out but that's only a by-product.Very true.
I think I'd find it hard to focus on that though, if I was a professional fast bowler at this moment in time. Even just as a fan, I think it will be a while before I can watch some tailender getting roughed up without feeling a level of unease. I know that's not a rational reaction though.
Here's the thing though - the short pitched fast delivery is deliberately intended solely to make the batsman fear for his safety. Cricket allows and encourages it. He may play a rash shot or fend it off unsuccessfully and get out but that's only a by-product.
Isn't it a bit disingenuous then, when one of these deliveries actually does some harm, that everyone wrings their hands and says how awful it is? Something like this was always going to happen sooner or later.
But isn't the batsman unsettled by the thought or possibility of being hit by the ball? What else about the delivery would unsettle him? What's the purpose of a head-high bouncer if not to intimidate the batsman?Thats a tad bit over the top in that the short ball/bouncer is more to unsettle the batsman. An intentionally bowled beamer on the other hand is solely to make a batsman fear for his safety.
Also, there is an argument to be made that while bouncers are allowed they are not encouraged. There are restrictions placed on the number of bouncers you can bowl in each over with anything above the head of the batsman being called a 'wide ball' in an ODI/20-20 even if thats the first bouncer of the over.
Two an over in Test cricket. It's part of the game and the injuries are minimal. No one thinks Formula One should be abolished because of the horrible accidents Jules Bianchi or Marcos Senna have suffered. Or any number of other sports.But isn't the batsman unsettled by the thought or possibility of being hit by the ball? What else about the delivery would unsettle him? What's the purpose of a head-high bouncer if not to intimidate the batsman?
Is there a particular restriction in Tests?
Nobody said anything about abolishing it.Two an over in Test cricket. It's part of the game and the injuries are minimal. No one thinks Formula One should be abolished because of the horrible accidents Jules Bianchi or Marcos Senna have suffered. Or any number of other sports.
Amol mentioned it in the post directly above mine.Nobody said anything about abolishing it.
Apologies. I thought you were referring to me as it was my message you quoted.Amol mentioned it in the post directly above mine.
Michael Clarke just read out a statement on behalf of the Aussie team. Absolutely heartbreaking to watch.
They discuss that concept in this Freakonomics podcast, supporting you point:There's a school of thought that the more padding/protection in any sport the more risks taken. Hence we're seeing this growing problem with chronic brain injuries in the NFL. I don't have the stats to hand - so can't be certain but I'm sure I read somewhere that you're more likely to get concussed in the NFL (wearing a helmet) than you are in rugby (not wearing a helmet)
Some pathetic tweets on this on the red issue Twitter account, have no idea why they get involved in stuff like this.
Anyone have any idea where to watch the funeral in the UK? I know its being streamed in Australia but want to watch if I can.
Anyone have any idea where to watch the funeral in the UK? I know its being streamed in Australia but want to watch if I can.
In case you didn't see it, here's Michael Clarke's eulogy.
In case you didn't see it, here's Michael Clarke's eulogy.
In case you didn't see it, here's Michael Clarke's eulogy.