Peterson, Harris, etc....

Most of the global warming posturing is a masquerade for anti-capitalists to have a go at the Western patriarchy. That’s partly why the climate change thing for me is a contentious issue, because you can’t trust the players. You can’t trust the data because there is too much ideology involved.

so fecking nuanced, drizzle that nuance all over me baby
 
JP said:
Google is playing identity politics. Look up ‘White couple’ on Google images. Now look up ‘Black couple’ and ‘Asian couple’. It means Google is messing with algorithms ... according to a built-in political agenda.

:lol::lol: holy shit even his porn searches are boring
 
shock horror as man who misunderstood human right protections for trans people has also never read HR leaflet
It doesn’t even have to come to that. Keep your distance, no touching, no sex/appearance joke unless on intimate terms, common sense that you’d apply to any strangers on the street.

‘We don’t know the rules governing intersex workplace interactions’ is basically ‘goddamnit let me spank women and make sexist jokes without repercussions’.
 
v40uf6v06mr21.jpg
 
I wonder if they believe those false equivalences.

The US needs more Latino pride! A foundational culture in US history, present and future.

I guess to people who believe that there is a white genocide happening by other "races" outbirthing white people this doesn't look much like a false equivalence. To them the guy next to AOC is promoting white genocide. :wenger::wenger::wenger:
 
Why couldn't he just wear a t-shirt saying he's against all the bad stuff under Islamaphobe
Because then he'd have to deal with the fact that these things are part of "his own culture" as well. This way he has them neatly externalised.
 
What does he mean by abortion-on-demand? How else would you have one? Abortion by random chance? Abortion by lottery?

you know what, never mind.
 
What does he mean by abortion-on-demand? How else would you have one? Abortion by random chance? Abortion by lottery?

you know what, never mind.
Is he making a distinction between abortion for extreme reasons, like incest or rape, or a threat to the mother's life, versus abortion because you just don't really fancy it?

That's how I read it. But thinking about it he's against abortion either way, so not sure he'd make that distinction.
 
Is he making a distinction between abortion for extreme reasons, like incest or rape, or a threat to the mother's life, versus abortion because you just don't really fancy it?

That's how I read it. But thinking about it he's against abortion either way, so not sure he'd make that distinction.
It's just the wording that gets me. Like a woman having an abortion because she doesn't feel she's able to raise a child makes this decision light heartedly and just sees it as a minor inconvenience. We really should legalize post natal abortions for people like Shapiro. Fecking cnut makes my blood boil.

I remember why I avoid this thread normally.
 
Is he making a distinction between abortion for extreme reasons, like incest or rape, or a threat to the mother's life, versus abortion because you just don't really fancy it?

That's how I read it. But thinking about it he's against abortion either way, so not sure he'd make that distinction.


abortion is only allowed if the womans gonna kill herself, to add some more "wtf" to it

also give women guns so they can kill rapists
 


abortion is only allowed if the womans gonna kill herself, to add some more "wtf" to it

also give women guns so they can kill rapists

Humans are such a ridiculous species. Really. How are these actual views from actual people. Though I suppose classifying Shapiro under people is a bit of a stretch.
 
The Peterson-Zizek thing was a hilarious occurrence. Neither of them looked remotely prepared. Peterson only read the Manifesto ffs, not even any of Zizek's stuff. Which is also puff piece garbage imo.

I think that essentially sums up Peterson's entire output.