Lewis.no.9
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2014
- Messages
- 2,077
Ah yeah i thought we played weekend lads my bad. Next tuesday would be more realistic.
Who's been better than him on the wings?
If Pedro wants playing time then he won't go City, no way they bench two players who would cost them nearly £50m each.They have lodged a bid of £47m for KDB so its possible they could get him as well.
funny that
you do realise he was our best wide player last season....i can understand the slagging off when it comes to wasters like Anderson was....
Young's attitude has been superb
Spot on, Young was one of our best players in general last year.
All spot on.I agree. We may may well have Memphis, Pedro, Mata etc as wide options soon, but Young shouldn't be dropped because of a name. Whoever takes Young's place in the team should do it by outperforming him. As it stands, he's been our best attacking player for some time, and should keep his place until that is no longer the case.
I wasn't saying he would go there but if he did then they must not be getting KDB. I think it has just advanced things the apparent City interest s we tie this up quickly and as such Pedro has asked to leave.If Pedro wants playing time then he won't go City, no way they bench two players who would cost them nearly £50m each.
It might be similar to the Depay transfer, another club declared interest and we signed him within a day.I wasn't saying he would go there but if he did then they must not be getting KDB. I think it has just advanced things the apparent City interest s we tie this up quickly and as such Pedro has asked to leave.
Am I the only person if figures are to be believed that 30mill for Pedro is a bit too much, and is kind of an underwhelming signing when after losing Di Maria and being so toothless in attack we need a real world class striker or winger who can dribble past players and create things
I mean I dont see much difference with Nani on the wings than having pedro, personally i thing nani is even the better player, yet we sell him for 3 mill, and now bringing a 27 yr old Pedro for 30mill? Seems pretty stupid to me
If Arsenal got Sanchez for 30mill, Chelsea got Fabregas same price, 30 mill for Pedro is way overboard imo
All spot on.
I hope so, would be a good signing and what we need. Hes playing with a massive smile on his face tonight, he must have signed the contract and is looking forward to working with LVG.It might be similar to the Depay transfer, another club declared interest and we signed him within a day.
I think we are going to have to join the euro zone to stop the confusion.It's euros not pounds.
Itss euros not pounds, Pedro has more to his game and more consistency than Nani has ever had. Pedro had a pretty much identical goal/assist to game ratio as Sanchez did at Barca, Sanchez was slightly better but Pedro does more defensively. 22mil quid is a bargain.Am I the only person if figures are to be believed that 30mill for Pedro is a bit too much, and is kind of an underwhelming signing when after losing Di Maria and being so toothless in attack we need a real world class striker or winger who can dribble past players and create things
I mean I dont see much difference with Nani on the wings than having pedro, personally i thing nani is even the better player, yet we sell him for 3 mill, and now bringing a 27 yr old Pedro for 30mill? Seems pretty stupid to me
If Arsenal got Sanchez for 30mill, Chelsea got Fabregas same price, 30 mill for Pedro is way overboard imo
Am I the only person if figures are to be believed that 30mill for Pedro is a bit too much, and is kind of an underwhelming signing when after losing Di Maria and being so toothless in attack we need a real world class striker or winger who can dribble past players and create things
I mean I dont see much difference with Nani on the wings than having pedro, personally i thing nani is even the better player, yet we sell him for 3 mill, and now bringing a 27 yr old Pedro for 30mill? Seems pretty stupid to me
If Arsenal got Sanchez for 30mill, Chelsea got Fabregas same price, 30 mill for Pedro is way overboard imo
Aston Villa this Friday night is the next match and too soon for Pedro.Ah yeah i thought we played weekend lads my bad. Next tuesday would be more realistic.
Itss euros not pounds, Pedro has more to his game and more consistency than Nani has ever had. Pedro had a pretty much identical goal/assist to game ratio as Sanchez did at Barca, Sanchez was slightly better but Pedro does more defensively. 22mil quid is a bargain.
Amazingly no you're not, but you're getting your euros mixed up with your pounds.
The Nani comment must be a wind up right?
a simple tap in on reboundHow was the goal?
Messi freekick hit the wall, came back Messi fired it under the wall and the keeper made a good save and Pedro followed it up and smashed it into the roof of the net from about 4 yards out.How was the goal?
I know what you mean, but the player who we bought to be creative and productive.....well look at how that turned out.Whilst he was one of our best players and deserves his new contract, we all know that we are not going to win the league being reliant on Young as a starting winger.
We can applaud his attitude and the way he played to an extent, but he is not creative or productive enough.
He and Messi(to whom the ball fell) were the only players who kept playing and didn't start to beg for a pen.. Good lad