Bruno who ?Correct. He’ll replace Lingard/Mata in the starting line up. Begs me to wonder, where the feck will Bruno play then.
Fernandes.Bruno who ?
(Insert Sacha Baron Cohen gif)Bruno who ?
I definitely agree. But if he shines for us it'll b a big lift for our attack, and in the end replacing Lukaku who is as it is a misfit, with someone as talented as him is a good deal. I have my concerns which you've outlined but I'm positive about this being a smart move. We're using a striker who just doesn't fit and has techncial deficiencies with one of the more technically impressive second strikers around.Dybala for Lukaku would be a fantastic exchange but I think some of you guys are a bit overly optimistic about his positional versatility (or lack of it).
A bit like Griezmann, he is a second striker pure and simple. He isn't suited to be a winger (was terrible in that role for Juve last year), he isn't going to play up front in a one striker formation (he has almost never done this), and he isn't going to be a trequartista type in a 4-4-2 diamond (he has played for teams that played this formation, but almost always as one of the strikers not as the trequartista).
You can play him as a "10" and call it a 4-2-3-1 but its really 4-4-1-1. When you're out of possession he's not going to be dropping back and becoming one of the midfielders in a 4-3-3 defensive shape so your shape is going to be 4-4-2 and your wingers are going to need to work a lot defensively. And when you're in possession he's not going to be dropping deep to help a lot with the buildup.
I think he could still be brilliant for United, especially if Solksjaer wants to play 4-4-2 or 4-4-1-1 anyway. But he definitely has positional limitations.
It says it on the bottom from October 22 2018This is old isn't it? Like last year?
Are you kidding me man? Only Martial and Rashford are capable of playing as a #9 and we’ve been through this. Mata and Sanchez aren’t good enough. You need an extra option to play as a #9. It’s a long season and injuries can factor in.
Being able to play there and being effective are two completely different things. It will take time for Greenwood to settle into the big boys league. Lingard can’t play as a false nine. And when was the last time Sanchez was available to be picked for a game and when was the last time he was actually good for us?No I'm not kidding you. We have Martial, Rashford and Greenwood who are 9's, Lingard's best games last season were as a false 9, Sanchez can play 9.
However, all other subjective arguments aside I don't want players here who either see the club as a stepping stone to Barca or Madrid, are here only for the money, or because we are their only option because they're being forced out of their current club. Dybala would qualify for at 2 of these and probably all 3. He has no dreams of playing for United and if he came it would be for (another) ludicrous wage. Don't want.
I definitely agree. But if he shines for us it'll b a big lift for our attack, and in the end replacing Lukaku who is as it is a misfit, with someone as talented as him is a good deal. I have my concerns which you've outlined but I'm positive about this being a smart move. We're using a striker who just doesn't fit and has techncial deficiencies with one of the more technically impressive second strikers around.
If I was to have a guess, I'd say about October 22 of last year. Possibly just after 25 minutes to 8.This is old isn't it? Like last year?
If I was to have a guess, I'd say about October 22 of last year. Possibly just after 25 minutes to 8.
Being able to play there and being effective are two completely different things. It will take time for Greenwood to settle into the big boys league. Lingard can’t play as a false nine. And when was the last time Sanchez was available to be picked for a game and when was the last time he was actually good for us?
Dybala is a better, more established player. You had to get a subtle little dig in though didn't youHe'll certainly improve your team, possibly a lot, providing you can figure out where/how to play him. If we can't get Lo Celso then for sure I'd be happy to see him at Spurs.
There's risks in every transfer. Players like Dybala are worth the risk.Does anybody else worry we have another AdM situation here if he does arrive?
Does anybody else worry we have another AdM situation here if he does arrive?
Greenwood is 17. No one is asking to keep him in the reserves or sell him. He will get his chance but it’s crazy to depend on a 17 year in case we have injuries. Lingard is here cause he is an academy player. No other reason. He is way more into building his brand on Instagram than playing football. Pogba does it it but he has the talent to back it up.Greenwood will only develop into a top player if he's given game time. That's far less likely if we sign Dybala.
The rest is just subjective comments on players effectiveness, for me Lingard is a far better player than he's given credit for on here, Sanchez is still a player with quality and would probably be more effective centrally now his pace has diminished.
Greenwood is 17. No one is asking to keep him in the reserves or sell him. He will get his chance but it’s crazy to depend on a 17 year in case we have injuries. Lingard is here cause he is an academy player. No other reason. He is way more into building his brand on Instagram than playing football. Pogba does it it but he has the talent to back it up.
Lingard is one of the hardest working and dedicated players we have. He isn't the best player in the squad and obviously needs guidance on the way he presents himself on social media, but he cares about the club and works his socks off on the pitch, unlike some some others last season.
If this was to happen wonder if Rashford would get the number 9 shirt and Dybala takes the 10.
Needs guidance on social media? He is going to be 27 ffs at year end. He isn’t 17 to be told to be more mature and that playing for United you will always be in the spotlight so you need to watch what you do.Lingard is one of the hardest working and dedicated players we have. He isn't the best player in the squad and obviously needs guidance on the way he presents himself on social media, but he cares about the club and works his socks off on the pitch, unlike some some others last season.
I'm going to leave this pointless circular argument here. I'm just hoping we won't get Dybala as is goes against everything I thought we were trying to do this summer.
I'd take him with Dybala
If this was to happen wonder if Rashford would get the number 9 shirt and Dybala takes the 10.
We’ll always have those until we rise to the top. All clubs have them.Does anybody else worry we have another AdM situation here if he does arrive?
I reckon Martial would get the 9 back, Rashford would stay 10 and Dybala would be 11.Probably not, the 10 is a big deal at United. Don’t see why Rashford would ever want to change from it.
The guy grew up watching Rooney as well as played next to him when he was captain.
I mean, there are fans that say Lukaku will do well in Serie A because it’s a lower quality league and fail to notice that Dybala only scored 5 league goals from 30+ games last season.
Our history with Argentinian players is also horrific.
The only question I'm asking myself is why is Juve willing to let him go? Does he have some sort of injury issue nobody knows of? It's just bizarre to me. Perhaps it's just Alexis 2.0 paranoia.
And Lukaku had no service.He played away from his natural position in fairness. Out on the right was it not?
The only question I'm asking myself is why is Juve willing to let him go? Does he have some sort of injury issue nobody knows of? It's just bizarre to me. Perhaps it's just Alexis 2.0 paranoia.