Mainoldo
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2004
- Messages
- 22,965
Let’s hope Matt Judge doesn’t mess this one up. Then again he loves here have some astronomical wages.
This is happening, right?
That’s just journalists trying to save face if it doesn’t happen.The briefing clearly says 'No guarantee deal will be done'.
You guys better reign yourself in as this may end up in tears.
The briefing clearly says 'No guarantee deal will be done'.
You guys better reign yourself in as this may end up in tears.
That’s just journalists trying to save face if it doesn’t happen.
Young and jones are shit. The former won’t start big games with Shaw and Wan-Bissaka starting and the later is always injured. De Gea is a GK. I’m talking about experience in the outfield players. Mata and Sanchez aren’t good enough to start big names.
Also you’re forgetting we HAVE to replace Lukaku when he leaves. We are getting a ready made replacement in Dybala.
It's not necessarily a brief, if Dybala's agent is in United's buildings then these journalists will have contacts that can confirm it.
Are you kidding me man? Only Martial and Rashford are capable of playing as a #9 and we’ve been through this. Mata and Sanchez aren’t good enough. You need an extra option to play as a #9. It’s a long season and injuries can factor in.Why do we HAVE to replace Lukaku? We have Martial, Rashford, Sanchez, Mata, James and Lingard who can play across the front 3 in various combinations, plus Greenwood, Gomes and Chong coming through who are potentially better than all of them.
Dybala is a player who would only be coming here because Juve want rid, his prime motivation would be money and that is not what we need.
What we actually need is to replace Matic with an effective, mobile DM who can distribute the ball.
We probably have a lot of convincing to do, in fairness. Before he commits to us he'd need to be convinced we're a team on the up and that the lack of CL is a blip.Surely his agent wouldn't even come to England for talks if Dybala had zero interest in joining Utd.
I mean, he probably has the internet.We probably have a lot of convincing to do, in fairness. Before he commits to us he'd need to be convinced we're a team on the up and that the lack of CL is a blip.
Could be a ploy as well. To have Inter pump up the money for Lukaku or have Sporting reduce the asking money for Bruno.it's a clear briefing by the club now, given that Stone, Luckhurst and Hirst have all confirmed talks.
surely United wouldn't brief journalists if they weren't optimistic?! It's not like "we tried!" would appease fans if things went sideways.
Obviously not that simple though.I mean, he probably has the internet.
Jim white said on Sky Sports that there’s a chance Mandzukic could be involved in the deal as well.
Why do we HAVE to replace Lukaku? We have Martial, Rashford, Sanchez, Mata, James and Lingard who can play across the front 3 in various combinations, plus Greenwood, Gomes and Chong coming through who are potentially better than all of them.
Dybala is a player who would only be coming here because Juve want rid, his prime motivation would be money and that is not what we need.
What we actually need is to replace Matic with an effective, mobile DM who can distribute the ball.
Wonder what our rival fans think if we do sign Dybala? @GlastonSpur @cesc's_mullet
fecking terrible as always. Don’t even know why he is a journalist. I have more respect for Delaney than this nutter.
Absolutely terrible scouting too, like Aguero or Lavezzi? Neither are like the other let alone like Dybala.
Yeah but what do they knowNot joining if Dybala joins of course. Also pretty much all English reporters have been consistent with saying there is nothing in it.
If he pulls this off then he should be name the “Muppet Master”Sir Ed swapping Lukaku for Dybala purely to spite Inter for not selling him Perisic The man is a muppet god
Mandzukic is a beast !
Correct. He’ll replace Lingard/Mata in the starting line up. Begs me to wonder, where the feck will Bruno play then.Dybala for Lukaku would be a fantastic exchange but I think some of you guys are a bit deluded about his positional versatility (or lack of it).
A bit like Griezmann, he is a second striker pure and simple. He isn't suited to be a winger (was terrible in that role for Juve last year), he isn't going to play up front in a one striker formation (he has almost never done this), and he isn't going to be a trequartista type in a 4-4-2 diamond (he has played for teams that played this formation, but almost always as one of the strikers not as the trequartista).
You can play him as a "10" and call it a 4-2-3-1 but its really 4-4-1-1. When you're out of possession he's not going to be dropping back and becoming one of the midfielders in a 4-3-3 defensive shape so your shape is going to be 4-4-2 and your wingers are going to need to work a lot defensively. And when you're in possession he's not going to be dropping deep to help a lot with the buildup.
I think he could still be brilliant for United, especially if Solksjaer wants to play 4-4-2 or 4-4-1-1 anyway. But he definitely has positional limitations.