davidmichael
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2015
- Messages
- 3,727
Ridiculous call without knowing how good or crap we do in the upcoming windowIf he stays and stays fit, we'll win the league next year. Calling it.
This will be one of the important decision that our DoF will make.
Selling Pogba means we are losing quality player in our squad and we must sign a quality top player to replace his creativity outlet. That will be another additional player we need to sign in our transfer list.
If we give him new contract means Murtough needs to deal with Raiola which going to be tricky how much wages and agent fees we will need to give.
My Nan used to have this funny saying that I used to find hilarious as a kid but kind of stuck with me through into adult life which was “is the juice worth the squeeze ?” and it is very appropriate in regards to us giving Pogba a new contract.
Do the pro’s outweigh the con’s in keeping Pogba or do we sell him cut price in the summer then add a creative midfielder to our transfer targets as he’ll need to be replaced as I’m afraid I don’t think VDB is up to the task, if I’m honest I’d rather we use VDB as a makeweight in a deal for someone else or sell him as I think he’s a player that will do well in Spain or Italy but struggle in England.
I’ve changed my mind a few times on whether to give Pogba a new contract but now I’m firmly of the opinion that the juice IS worth the squeeze in giving him a new contract as replacing him is near on impossible and it would be for around half of what we paid, in a worst case scenario we could sell him in summer 2023 and get a much better fee with him being under a longer contract.
Also it’s clear we’re a better team with him in it, I’m very much of the belief that if we put a pure out and out defensive midfielder alongside him then we could play Pogba AND Fernandes in the biggest games instead of McTominay and Fred which means we’d be playing with two creative midfielders and playing to win rather than not lose as we currently do.
I think if we were to sign Sancho, a pure out and out defensive midfielder and a quality centre back with pace as well as keeping Pogba we’d be in a position to challenge for the title, it took City putting an outrageous run of winning 20 games in a row to pull away from us and I don't think they’d do that again next season so with a properly balanced starting 11 and City not putting together a run like this season we’re realistic title challengers.
My advice would be choose only one of those three you have mentioned because that's what we will be forced to do come the summer and the usual negative leaks will start coming out of the club again
This is the problem Pogba has, to the majority of united fans he’s only ever one bad game away from hell fire. God forbid he performs like Bruno has since Xmas, granted Bruno’s stats give him money in the bank, but that didn’t stop Pogba being abused on the pitch the season he topped our charts for goals and assists.My opinion on Pogba has changed so many times, he is one half-arsed display away from changing it again. One thing that we cannot deny is that we were top of the league on the 12th Jan. Pogba got injured, and now we are 11 points adrift after eleventy million draws.
We have missed his quality in the final third. He makes things happen. We are a better team when he plays.
Our dilemma is that he is 28 years old, and only has a year left on his contract, so his stock is falling. If we are ever going to cash in on him, to fund an alternative replacement, like Grealish, it has to be now.
A lot rests on what he wants to do next. With only a year left on his contract, he has got the bargaining power to force a transfer.
My opinion on Pogba has changed so many times, he is one half-arsed display away from changing it again. One thing that we cannot deny is that we were top of the league on the 12th Jan. Pogba got injured, and now we are 11 points adrift after eleventy million draws.
We have missed his quality in the final third. He makes things happen. We are a better team when he plays.
Our dilemma is that he is 28 years old, and only has a year left on his contract, so his stock is falling. If we are ever going to cash in on him, to fund an alternative replacement, like Grealish, it has to be now.
A lot rests on what he wants to do next. With only a year left on his contract, he has got the bargaining power to force a transfer.
It’s always been this way with Pogba, even back when he was our top scorer and creator before Bruno, he would still get dogs abuse.This is the problem Pogba has, to the majority of united fans he’s only ever one bad game away from hell fire. God forbid he performs like Bruno has since Xmas, granted Bruno’s stats give him money in the bank, but that didn’t stop Pogba being abused on the pitch the season he topped our charts for goals and assists.
One of those players will be near impossible to move on unless he settles for a wage cut. That means we may also have to let him go in the cheap. Two of those players will have to be sold for peanuts or let go for free. The other three we’ll be lucky to get a combined £20m for.I think Milenkovic, Rice and Sancho is a realistic transfer window and all three can be bought if we move De Gea, Dalot, Jones, Mata, Pereira, Lingard and Chong all on too.
Grealish is not a Pogba replacement. He hasn’t played centre mid since playing in the Championship. He would be more of a Rashford replacement/competitionMy opinion on Pogba has changed so many times, he is one half-arsed display away from changing it again. One thing that we cannot deny is that we were top of the league on the 12th Jan. Pogba got injured, and now we are 11 points adrift after eleventy million draws.
We have missed his quality in the final third. He makes things happen. We are a better team when he plays.
Our dilemma is that he is 28 years old, and only has a year left on his contract, so his stock is falling. If we are ever going to cash in on him, to fund an alternative replacement, like Grealish, it has to be now.
A lot rests on what he wants to do next. With only a year left on his contract, he has got the bargaining power to force a transfer.
Itd be a lot of money off the wage bill though. It all adds up.One of those players will be near impossible to move on unless he settles for a wage cut. That means we may also have to let him go in the cheap. Two of those players will have to be sold for peanuts or let go for free. The other three we’ll be lucky to get a combined £20m for.
Send Pogba to Madrid. Ask for Oedegaard back. Then deal with Riola so we also get Haaland for £90M for accepting such a deal. Pogba is good, but I'd take this in a heartbeat.
Odegaard has played quite a bit on the right side, and he's defensive enough to play as a CM as well. It's not about the swap itself. Pogba wants out, and the last few games Odegaard played for Arsenal shows that he's more than good enough to take on PL.Where will you put Odegaard? Pogba isn’t a #10 for us and Odegaard is, it isn’t a straight swap.
Does that mean no Haaland to City?
Chelsea thenYeah not to us and not to City. So a good thing.
It means neither of those things. Raiola chats a bunch of shite in the media and then does contrary. It’s all part of the plan for him.Yeah not to us and not to City. So a good thing.
It means neither of those things. Raiola chats a bunch of shite in the media and then does contrary. It’s all part of the plan for him.
"I could take my nephew of 5 years and find a club for Paul at a high level"
what does that even mean?
"I could take my nephew of 5 years and find a club for Paul at a high level"
what does that even mean?
"I could take my nephew of 5 years and find a club for Paul at a high level"
what does that even mean?
This is what I said - personally most of the players that deal with Raiola as an agent have a poor intelligence or mentally egotistical issues.
It means give me the money or Pogba is off."I could take my nephew of 5 years and find a club for Paul at a high level"
what does that even mean?