Paul Pogba | Undergoing Medical | Helping out the Laundry Ladies

Do you want Pogba for £100 million?

  • Total voters
    1,968
Akshay said:
Maybe I'm just old-school but the thought of spending 100M on one player doesn't really excite me. I guess transfer fees are inflating at a faster rate than I can keep up with.
Click to expand...

It doesn't excite anyone really but the statement does. For the last 3 years we've listened to people making excuses. We'll try harder. We'll do better. It's a little bit 'crazy' but then look at the players we missed out on because we weren't willing to go that extra yard? We could have got Hazard and what's his value now? We could have got Robben first time if Kenyon hadn't been so cheap. We could have got Ronaldinho but left it to late and Barcelona got involved. We could, as mentioned prior, have had Batistuta.....

We could have got Shearer but Saints didn't want to deal with us - nor Blackburn. We could have got Bale but similar story and again look at his 'value' now.
 
While some people love harping on about how Pogba is overrated, it's also important to mention that he is underrated at the same time by a lot of people in this very thread.

I see people keep talking about his potential and underrating his real level as to explain why it'd be banal to by him for the quoted fee. There is this confusion about what's going on with Pogba with many people still thinking he's still all about potential rather than the kid already delivering very high level football. His potential is just further boost but as he is now, he's already an excellent player and people tend to miss this for some odd reasons.

I think his few bad/OKeish performances at the EUro are clouding people's judgement and most are now just rating him way below his actual current level.
 
Striker10 said:
It doesn't excite anyone really but the statement does. For the last 3 years we've listened to people making excuses. We'll try harder. We'll do better. It's a little bit 'crazy' but then look at the players we missed out on because we weren't willing to go that extra yard? We could have got Hazard and what's his value now? We could have got Robben first time if Kenyon hadn't been so cheap. We could have got Ronaldinho but left it to late and Barcelona got involved. We could, as mentioned prior, have had Batistuta.....

We could have got Shearer but Saints didn't want to deal with us - nor Blackburn. We could have got Bale but similar story and again look at his 'value' now.
Click to expand...
Yeah that's true, I'd be happy to get Pogba I just wonder if that much money couldn't be better spent elsewhere. The other players you've mentioned didn't go for anywhere near the kinds of money being talked about here.
 
Santoryo said:
While some people love harping on about how Pogba is overrated, it's also important to mention that he is underrated at the same time by a lot of people in this very thread.

I see people keep talking about his potential and underrating his real level as to explain why it'd be banal to by him for the quoted fee. There is this confusion about what's going on with Pogba with many people still thinking he's still all about potential rather than the kid already delivering very high level football. His potential is just further boost but as he is now, he's already an excellent player and people tend to miss this for some odd reasons.

I think his few bad/OKeish performances at the EUro are clouding people's judgement and most are now just rating him way below his actual current level.
Click to expand...

When you are trying to buy someone for 100million and they are not yet at their level, you say potential to lower expectations. People have already acknowledged that he would improve our first team but there are still ways in which he can improve.
 
Vashu said:
By trying to sign best players at any cost for most positions in an attempt to build the best team you basically become an entity comparable to Man City and Real. And I would have a problem with that.
Click to expand...
Man United have earned their money. City and Madrid have not as one is backed by an Arab billionaire and the other is backed by the Spanish government.
 
Vialli_92 said:
Man United have earned their money. City and Madrid have not as one is backed by an Arab billionaire and the other is backed by the Spanish government.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure that it's a myth.
 
Mancunia_Religion said:
I think he's going to Madrid to but I'm beginning to think there might be something in it now. Madrid do have Kroos and Modric already. If they do get Pogba I'd like to have Kroos from off them if that's the case.
Click to expand...

Reports are that Zidane does not want to break up his CL winning team. Why would he swap Pogba for Kroos? It will never happen.
 
podurban2 said:
Reports are that Zidane does not want to break up his CL winning team. Why would he swap Pogba for Kroos? It will never happen.
Click to expand...

There are a lot of conflicting reports tbh. Some say Zidane really wants Pogba but Perez doesn't really. Either way it wouldn't surprise me if they went for him.
 
podurban2 said:
Reports are that Zidane does not want to break up his CL winning team. Why would he swap Pogba for Kroos? It will never happen.
Click to expand...
I hope that this is true. If Real are not in the running then I can see us signing Pogba for around 80m.
 
Don't know much about Twitter, or if it even means anything, but i just read that Pogba unfavorited Juventus from his favorites or something lol.
 
Cathy Ferguson said:
I hope that this is true. If Real are not in the running then I can see us signing Pogba for around 80m.
Click to expand...
Why are we so concerned with money. It's not our money. Ed must have done some homework. After all those stupid movie promotions had some money coming in, right?
 
ti vu said:
Not sure whether he's anymore. Wasn't he the one ran "Woodward told Mourinho to take a year in Chinese league" story?
Click to expand...

Yes, but that only riled up the United fanbase and made it clearer most wanted Jose as manager, now that Jose is manager he hasn't done any shit stirring.
 
Striker10 said:
When you are trying to buy someone for 100million and they are not yet at their level, you say potential to lower expectations. People have already acknowledged that he would improve our first team but there are still ways in which he can improve.
Click to expand...
In today's market with inflated prices, 100 million being quoted isn't surprising at all, that's simply how things roll now. If you want top players now(especially from a team that doesn't want to sell in the first place), clubs have to spend huge amount of money, sometimes even overpaying especially in our cases where we have very little fighting power beside money at this point(No CL to boost us).

100 million might be too much but we aren't the first to have to throw around huge or silly sum of money to get a marquee signing. In fact it's something which happen quite often with all elite and top club in Europe. All these Barca, Real etc have overspent at some point(and this despite currently being far more attractive destinations than us) and it helped them remain at the top of European football, that's simply the way things are. Money needs to be spent, it's as simple as that. Sometimes too much get spent, sometimes there are bargain but the important thing is to get needed players.

If we have money, why shy away and act as if we're struggling financially just for the sake of being stingy? What we need right now isn't money but players whom can only be required after spending money and plenty at that.
 
Vialli_92 said:
Man United have earned their money. City and Madrid have not as one is backed by an Arab billionaire and the other is backed by the Spanish government.
Click to expand...

I know that we had, but I'd like the club to operate astutely and to not eagerly jump on every hype train whilst waving the checkbook.
 
Vashu said:
I know that we had, but I'd like the club to operate astutely and to not eagerly jump on every hype train whilst waving the checkbook.
Click to expand...

But we don't, in fact it's kind of ridiculous how little we don't when you consider the size of the club. We're almost astute to a fault at times.
 
JPRouve said:
I'm pretty sure that it's a myth.
Click to expand...
I have to agree with the other poster here. While it's not like the Arabs, Russian, Qatari... directly pump money to the clubs, Real Madrid did benefit from the government connection and influence. The way they overcome the debt within Perez first tenure, how they can take loan that easy to fund the Galaticos project, that TV deal, dodgy tax cases, dodgy young players transfer, have a newspaper that is like official outlet to further their agenda... (Some of these is the same with Barcelona and the Catalonia government)

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2009/jun/16/real-madrid-loans-debt

Allow many huge loans out years after years for football transfer while Spain economy was doing badly... If not with some serious backing, it's hard to see it happen. I meant other teams found difficulty in funding their stadium expansion which is more safer loan, as it's long term transferable project. Player transfer is very risky considering, they can get a career ending injury soon after the transfer and there is no way to recover the transfer fee then.
 
Last edited:
Vashu said:
I know that we had, but I'd like the club to operate astutely and to not eagerly jump on every hype train whilst waving the checkbook.
Click to expand...

Yeah but this isn't a player that we don't already know. It's not like we're about to offer this sort of money for everyone. There are only a few players we'd ever consider going this high for and I doubt we would for Ronaldo say....just my opinion but I think we are being astute. It just so happens it's a difficult transfer.
 
Playing in a double pivot with Matuidi tonight, with Griezmann just ahead, which is where I want to see him.

Went there against Republic of Ireland in the second half, and looked pretty good. Pretty much played the deeper role of the two, where he controlled the game and shown a good passing range.
 
drmuji said:
Why are we so concerned with money. It's not our money. Ed must have done some homework. After all those stupid movie promotions had some money coming in, right?
Click to expand...
I'm not concerned, I think that is a fair market price and we can afford it. The problem will be to convince Pogba to come here.
 
I don't think it's that much of a problem to convince him. If he's not 100% wanting to go to Spain? We can convince him by being direct/bold but United cannot afford to wait for this one deal so hopefully we've a few things lined up in case. Obviously the most important thing is France get knocked out tonight ;) and we'll take it from there
 
Judas said:
But we don't, in fact it's kind of ridiculous how little we don't when you consider the size of the club. We're almost astute to a fault at times.
Click to expand...

Bah! It was side topic discussion on what might be, not really where we are as a club. Context got lost on last few pages.

Anyway most important thing is having right manager who will correctly identify transfer targets. In last 3 years we didn't exactly have a proper tillerman.
 
Last edited:
RetroStu said:
Eh?, i think Pogba is worldclass, and i don't even think we are getting him so its not bias talking.
Click to expand...

It's not as if he has been central in winning Juve titles on the trot and integral in taking them I a champions league final and semi back to back
Tiber said:
I have no issue smashing the world transfer record for a talent like Pogba. Much better use of money than spending tens of millions on crap like Felliani and Rojo
Click to expand...

I tend to agree.

If you see how much Moyes and LVG spent between them compared to the price of Pogba which is more likely around £60-70million then surely it's better business to get someone who can make the difference in the team and the league!
 
Vialli_92 said:
Technically it is.
Click to expand...

Technically it's not because the City would have changed the status of the lands after the sell like they did for the rest of the area, you are suggesting that the City council buy lands under their value, they could but it's not fair. Also as the article suggests, the City needed and wanted the land in the first place.
 
Striker10 said:
Yeah but this isn't a player that we don't already know. It's not like we're about to offer this sort of money for everyone. There are only a few players we'd ever consider going this high for and I doubt we would for Ronaldo say....just my opinion but I think we are being astute. It just so happens it's a difficult transfer.
Click to expand...

I'm not opposing this transfer a priori, but my stance regarding it depends on the final fee.
 
JPRouve said:
Technically it's not because the City would have changed the status of the lands after the sell like they did for the rest of the area, you are suggesting that the City council buy lands under their value, they could but it's not fair. Also as the article suggests, the City needed and wanted the land in the first place.
Click to expand...
They are over paying for the land by a considerable amount. It's technically financing the team in a legal way.
 
Zidane likes both Pogba and Hazard as he's spoken highly of both in the past and how he thought both could fit in well at Real. Whether Perez shares the same opinion is an entirely different story.
Real's mouthpiece (AS, Marca) would write what Perez wants and put a spin on the whole thing accordingly.
 
This is BBC version of the Madrid case http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/22037966

Here has info on how Platini tried to influence the regulations. We know what happened to Platini since then!

What if Perez and Real Madrid lacks of their new Galaticos every summer since last year, have to do with the removal and investigation on UEFA and FIFA former TPTB?
 
ti vu said:
This is BBC version of the Madrid case http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/22037966

Here has info on how Platini tried to influence the regulations. We know what happened to Platini since then!

What if Perez and Real Madrid lacks of their new Galaticos every summer since last year, have to do with the removal and investigation on UEFA and FIFA former TPTB?
Click to expand...
Madrid has been condemned to pay 18 meuros for the parcel in las tablas, http://www.sport.es/es/noticias/rea...lones-por-ayudas-publicas-irregulares-5243364. In any case the value of the old city training is not so far from the real value (in my opinion) since it was situated in the best part of Madrid. Madrid got the rest of top players thanks to the revenue, the government didn´t finance it. They get bank credits basically because althought they have debt they also pay it, as a normal private society.However football in Spain is like this, Madrid is the pride of Spain and in case of need it will be always protected, I think that is not a secret, and not related to the thread.
 
ReDDHDevilS said:
Zidane likes both Pogba and Hazard as he's spoken highly of both in the past and how he thought both could fit in well at Real. Whether Perez shares the same opinion is an entirely different story.
Real's mouthpiece (AS, Marca) would write what Perez wants and put a spin on the whole thing accordingly.
Click to expand...

I don't see how any of them would fit into Madrid. They'd just be buying to stop others from getting.

Zidane favours a 433. Hazard wouldn't get into the team over Ronaldo or Bale and he's not a centre midfielder.

Pogba could possibly come get into the team over Casemiro, with Kroos playing the holding role, but that would ruin the balance of the team.
 
Vashu said:
I'm not opposing this transfer a priori, but my stance regarding it depends on the final fee.
Click to expand...

Agree. Not that it's my money but if we're looking how BEST to spend the available funds you have to question the transfer given the figures quoted.

£80 million(or whatever) for an attacking midfielder who only scored 10 goals last season. Playing in Italy. Worth remembering that Roy Keane, in a two man midfield, with loads more defensive responsibility was topping that.

He's a very good player but there must surely be a midfielder in the world who can get you 10 goals and his assists for £40 million. Otherwise what's happened to football?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.