First half he was poor but had no help from the attacking players as all were too static, but as soon as there was movement around he was brilliant.
It's a relief to see the movement issue detected. If there is little to none, then obviously you're going to see more high-risk, lower percentage passes made from one who is always trying to influence the game. You're also going to see more dribbles and 'hero actions' than you would from that exact player when other cogs are doing what they're supposed to be doing.
It's no coincidence that Pogba 'comes alive' when he has options and smart runs to pick out. He's never actually 'dead' as he will always have a high chance of influencing a game when balls are on to hit because his technical level is so high. He can have the equivalent Bruno stinker of a game but still come away with the plaudits, if the movement around him is good enough.
Our chicken and egg scenario has been intrinsic for his entire time at the club. He gets the blame for others because he tries to play with them in mind, which is ironic when his 'ball-hogging' is seen as selfish, rather than him attempting to buy time for others to actually move so that he can then progress the ball in an incisive manner.
Good player when we've got control of a game but my god is he bad when it's backs to the wall and we're getting run ragged like that first half
There's only so many times this can be a valid statement before you have to look at why this is the case rather than blaming the player/player(s). Our staff need to identify how to optimise their personnel, and with that, avoid the things that compromise each of them as much as possible. Someone else mentioned there's only so many times you can put a half-decent 2-way midfielder in a double-pivot and that's true: you either stop doing that or you compensate for it by getting in a better DM or buffering that area of the pitch with contingency cover for the invariable moments of compromise through whatever you want to call it (lapses in concentration; laziness; unawares of what is going on; or, more simply, an offensive-minded player not being at his best in such an adroitly defensive position) - how many times can that fall back on a player (any player) when their strengths and weaknesses are apparent?
France can use Pogba in that position because of what they surround him with and what it affords him in both directions. Why we keep doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome, hell only knows.
Our recruitment over the summer should have sorted this out and had Pogba field either further forward or with a world class anchor compensating for what he simply is. There should be no wonder to why we get half a tune out of him in the team when he's in the position he is with no mind to what it means for him, and for others.
Yes, he and every other outfield player were playing to a standard of Sunday league. However, to be fair, the forward line was not existent and never made themselves available. VDB was completely marked out of the game. It was when Rashford came on with Bruno completely flipped the game.
Entirely. Bruno is getting a lot of praise, but Rashford's driving runs, and ability to make swathes of opposition track him, desperately trying to cover passing lanes as well as his ball-carriage, opened up the field so much for anyone looking to use the ball behind him. It's a hammer and nail scenario. It would be nice if we had a bag of nails for our two hammers to hit. But that comes with coaching as opposed to waiting on inspired moments of individualism.
Really good to see an ex professional in Danny Murphy highlight how well Pogba played in the first half. He’s capable of playing better, but not on his own....He was our best player first half.
Even with Murphy's take, it won't be a surprise to see it dismissed, despite him being one of the harshest critics of United and midfielders in general, on British television.
I think the problem for Pogba is people don't particularly care what is going on around him or for whys and wherefores as they expect him, by himself, to turn everything into gold, which was never ever the player we bought from Juventus, who had Pirlo and Vidal behind him and a clear and defined role in the team, which allowed for his foibles but also optimised him at all times. You can't just scramble formulas and expect the same outcome. His NT and his former club compensate(d for his shortcomings (and yes, he has them), so why don't we? The few times we have, his form has been what he was bought here to be, but then, we slot him further back again because we haven't bought the correct players to lock him into a role that gets the best out of him and causes no-one else headaches.