Left footed and decently quick. Competent defensively and composed on the ball.Not the match, but one of them and a European final. His greatest attribute compared to Varane is that he's left footed IMV.
Left footed and decently quick. Competent defensively and composed on the ball.
Some have used this as a criticism (and it could be mistaken for damning with faint praise) but, actually, if he is a slightly-better, left-footed Lindelof then he’s pretty much what we need.
It’s true, but was he really that good on the ball tonight? I was a bit disappointed with that part. What did he actually achieve? I thought he misplaced so many passes.I was impressed with him tonight.
People are saying "he's another Lindelof", which is obviously true in that he's the same type of defender. But the club may well want that type of defender, as many top clubs do. There's a reason so many top sides place emphasis on a player's ability on the ball and that's Torres' strength. He should look at his best when his side are dominating and he's able to show his talent on the ball.
For that reason it was good to see another side to his game today, with him performing well in a backs-to-the-wall situation. It doesn't matter if Albiol was better again, because Torres is the one top clubs will be interested in.
God knows I wouldn't back some of our CBs not to feck up in that situation.
He would be a huge improvement on what we have. Thought he was excellent throughout.
Torres didn't stand out to me today, but then again he didn't look poor either. If he's an inexpensive option I'm interested but if he's in the 75m club take a pass.
No he wasn't. Albiol was. He's the one who cut out most of our final balls.What game were you watching man, Torres was excellent.
No he wasn't. Albiol was. He's the one who cut out most of our final balls.
Depends on your opinion of Lindelof, of course. I think he’s pretty good, just not quite good enough, and right footed.We need more than slightly better than Lindelof
I think it’s because he still needs to physically adapt and that’s no guarantee. Him being confident on the ball and left footed is good but shouldn’t be the qualities that trump others.Good on the ball and confident under our press.
If we do sign him the knives will be out straight away as people here seem to hate him for some reason though.
Depends on your opinion of Lindelof, of course. I think he’s pretty good, just not quite good enough, and right footed.
Some people say Lindelof is rubbish but I don’t pay too much attention to them.
I was not impressed by him. For one his entire midfield and attack played in front of him as centre backs. Secondly I was more impressed by Albiol and Fyoth even.
Torres doesn't look clumsy though, he's graceful and fairly athletic for his size. He defended the box really well I thought, whenever anything came near him he dealt with it and got some important blocks - especially the one on Mctominay.
His presence in the box is immediately more notable than Lindelof's. Having 2 big centre backs would really help us with our aerial issues.
Torres doesn't look clumsy though, he's graceful and fairly athletic for his size. He defended the box really well I thought, whenever anything came near him he dealt with it and got some important blocks - especially the one on Mctominay.
Obviously it's harder to tell whether he will look more comfortable in a high line but I don't see him being any worse than Lindelof in that regard. He definitely won't be getting bullied on the ball as easily that's for sure.
100%. Defending doesn't always mean winning the ball, you can disrupt your opponent enough to put them off. That's something I find Lindelof doesn't cannot do enough. He either wins the ball or just doesn't effect play, if anything the strikers climb all over him.I also remember that situation where Pogba got a header. He probably lost that «duel» in the stats, but he knocked into Pogba pretty hard making it very difficult for Pogba to score.
I do think that is a very sensible approach when you face someone tall, strong and athletic like Pogba. You dont have to beat them. Just hit them hard. For some, it appears to be close to an ego thing.
Torres proved he was a leader tonight. Yes, he had fair few players in front of him, but you could see how he was organising the players around him. Before tonight I wasn't fully sure he was the man for us but after tonight I was more convinced that he could do a good job for us.
He's a million miles better than Lindelof.
His presence in the box is immediately more notable than Lindelof's. Having 2 big centre backs would really help us with our aerial issues.
Torres doesn't look clumsy though, he's graceful and fairly athletic for his size. He defended the box really well I thought, whenever anything came near him he dealt with it and got some important blocks - especially the one on Mctominay.
Obviously it's harder to tell whether he will look more comfortable in a high line but I don't see him being any worse than Lindelof in that regard. He definitely won't be getting bullied on the ball as easily that's for sure.
100%. Defending doesn't always mean winning the ball, you can disrupt your opponent enough to put them off. That's something I find Lindelof doesn't cannot do enough. He either wins the ball or just doesn't effect play, if anything the strikers climb all over him.
He just looked really composed I thought, he's the type that would bring a calmness to the defence, the opposite of wild man Bailly.
The club will probably go with the 'sexier' choice in Varane if he's available, but I think Torres would be a great addition.
Stats don't mean much really. As the poster above mentioned, the challenge on Pogba would go down as a "lost" stat, but he actually effected the outcome of the game positively for them.His aerial stats are much weaker than Lindelof's, in a league less noted for aerial prowess than the PL.
Whoever was saying that was clearly very wrong about Lindelof. While he might look less clumsy on the ball apart from the odd long pass he's nothing special in terms of passing.People were saying the exact same thing about Lindelof over Smalling. Lindelof was supposed to bring that calmness and composure. Do you think our big weakness on set pieces and corners would be as bad if Smalling was playing?
Bailly isnt strong in the air so he really doesnt help in those situations anyway. But if its Lindelof Vs. Torres, Lindelof does a lot better than people might believe in the air most of the time. Its just every 10 or so he cocks it up completely and makes a mistake, which stands out for him because he is usually so far away from the action that he doesn't make a lot of mistakes most of the time
Stats don't mean much really. As the poster above mentioned, the challenge on Pogba would go down as a "lost" stat, but he actually effected the outcome of the game positively for them.
I'm much more of a fan of using the eye and using stats to confirm that, rather than the other way around.
His stature is noticeably more dominant, and I didn't see any signs of an aerial weakness at all. Perhaps he just puts himself into challenges that are unfavourable statistically, but help the team defend more?
Whoever was saying that was clearly very wrong about Lindelof. While he might look less clumsy on the ball apart from the odd long pass he's nothing special in terms of passing.
He clearly has an issue when a striker is a similar size to him, he just doesn't seem to be strong or heavy enough to displace the attacker. I find it strange how he lets attackers dictate what they want to do, rather than him taking control. The West Brom goal is a perfect example of this, I know it should have been a foul in the end but letting the striker jump over him and get his head to the ball first was just unbelievable.
Torres looks big, Lindelof doesn't if that makes sense? I can see him and Maguire making a decent pairing if they gel well.