croadyman
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 39,317
He said it wasn't in an advanced stage ysterday despite all the noise coming from spain, and rafael hernandez
See what you mean
He said it wasn't in an advanced stage ysterday despite all the noise coming from spain, and rafael hernandez
We all would but we've likely been told they're not willing to sell him this late in the window.I’m worried about this. Rather have Sancho.
Same, I'd rather Sancho now. But as a backup loan option (and rocket for Dortmund), it makes some sense. Hopefully enough to convince Dortmund. I don't think Dembele is the right fit, especially for a perm move.I’m worried about this. Rather have Sancho.
You don’t get to send an injured player back. You pay his wages injured or mot
dembele hasn’t played 45 games in a year in nearly 4 years. In the last 21 months he’s has played 30 games
Why? If he's on loan it's a placeholder move until we go in for Sancho next year.If we end up signing Dembele, even on loan, I'm done.
Norweigian journo
Norweigian journo
The tweet stated we were close to signing Dembele.What did the tweet say? Looks to have been deleted.
Cool, if that continues then the obligation will never be triggered. No skin off our backs.
It said something like the deal was basically done with only the two clubs having to finalize some details. Probably jumped the gun.The tweet stated we were close to signing Dembele.
Sod it I am probably going to look a complete clown but will say if he comes in he is going to prove everyone wrong and get over the injury issues
I've reposted it.It said something like the deal was basically done with only the two clubs having to finalize some details. Probably jumped the gun.
You have mixed up obligation and option. An obligation is exactly that, we would have to buy him no matter what happened.