FreakyJim
90% of teams play better football than us
what if we dropped to 4th and finished there?
Yes, fair point.
I think he's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't.
i.e. if he bins players instantly people think 'he's not even giving them a chance or assessing them' if he does what he has done then 'if he didn't want them, he should've just binned them'.
This is slightly exaggerated, to be fair. His third season at Chelsea in his first stint was worse than the two previous years but still yielded an FA Cup and League Cup. His third season at Real Madrid was poor but probably not quite to the point where it could be called catastrophic. Only really his third season at his second stint at Chelsea can be seen in that way, I'd argue. Although I am concerned that while we've improved, Mourinho's not really been able to instantly elevate us to a title winning level in the way he did with Chelsea during his first stint there when he was at his managerial peak.
We may have been knocked out of the Champions League having surrendered to Sevilla with four shots over two legs.
- fair, underperformed here. Glad we're debating about CL fails rather than Europa league btw.
We may have our most expensive player of all time playing awful for months. (Up until this year literally the most expensive player of all time)
- and has been critised by the boss, hauled off, dropped, etc. Clearly the manager thinks the same as you. Perhaps the player in question needs to pull his socks up.
We may have DDG having more shots against him than ever before under Ferguson.
- and more clean sheets...pointless stats.
We may have spent close to 200 million on attacking players and look offensively clueless.
- fair, needs more cohesion. Solace that the manager is calling this out too. Also aren't we like 3/4 highest scorers in the league?!
We may have our most promising young players (Shaw, Rashford and Martial) rumoured to be wanting to leave the club.
- subjective. Even Macheda and Januzaj were 'promising young players' once.
We may have a manager that consistently proves to be catastrophic in his third year.
- neither here nor there, a complex matter.
But at least we’re second.
- the key metric which is used in almost all club related decisions (at any football club)
We may have been knocked out of the Champions League having surrendered to Sevilla with four shots over two legs.
We may have our most expensive player of all time playing awful for months. (Up until this year literally the most expensive player of all time)
We may have DDG having more shots against him than ever before under Ferguson.
We may have spent close to 200 million on attacking players and look offensively clueless.
We may have our most promising young players (Shaw, Rashford and Martial) rumoured to be wanting to leave the club.
We may have a manager that consistently proves to be catastrophic in his third year.
We may have seen signings that as of now rival LVG for wasted money.
But at least we’re second.
People have been saying it’s exagerated to me for years but I called his second Chelsea stint while others were proclaiming his team would be unbeaten for years.
He’s not a long term manager. He’s doing the same thing here now IMO
Does anyone disageee with any of the following;
We are some ways away from competing with Man city. Money isn’t an excuse, we are both absolutely loaded.
City, liverpool and spurs all play significantly more attractive football than us.
Our manager would rather avoid defeat at all costs than throw caution to the wind and go for a result from the 1st minute.
We are right to be concerned and right to wonder if the man in charge is the correct person to take us back to the top.
I cba to go through all of that, people know my views and get sick of reading them. But that pogba bit is especially galling. “The manager agrees with me” and the player needs to “pull his socks up”. Mourinho got him in for 100 MILLION pounds. He should be winning us points regularly. That is a massive red flag that is not picked on enough. If I went into my work and spent the most money any company had ever spent on a new employee I then don’t get to a year later say “well maybe he should work harder”Responses in red below...
Does anyone disageee with any of the following;
We are some ways away from competing with Man city. Money isn’t an excuse, we are both absolutely loaded.
City, liverpool and spurs all play significantly more attractive football than us.
Our manager would rather avoid defeat at all costs than throw caution to the wind and go for a result from the 1st minute.
We are right to be concerned and right to wonder if the man in charge is the correct person to take us back to the top.
Totally agree with you re: Pogba, he's just not been good enough and we often seem to be wearing our rose tinted spectacles.I cba to go through all of that, people know my views and get sick of reading them. But that pogba bit is especially galling. “The manager agrees with me” and the player needs to “pull his socks up”. Mourinho got him in for 100 MILLION pounds. He should be winning us points regularly. That is a massive red flag that is not picked on enough. If I went into my work and spent the most money any company had ever spent on a new employee I then don’t get to a year later say “well maybe he should work harder”
I almost want us to get a flashy attack minded young manager in that plays sexy football for a season.
Everyone applauding his style and we end up 7th (see likes of Arsenal as an example).
Folks on here would be yearning for a more 'boring' results oriented manager. There is no winning.
People act as if SAF's team didn't grind out boring victories and draws...
With Liverpool and Spurs it’s not just about attractive football, it’s the way they are capable of going toe to toe with top teams and out-play them. Our results against big teams have been pretty damn good but it’s invariably been a smash and grab. And Manchester United shouldn’t be playing like under-dogs as often as we do under Mourinho.
Yeah it sure was Blind, Shaw and Darmian that lost us the game todaySure, noted and agreed.
I still want to give Jose the benefit of the doubt. Still a final batch of players that are not 'his' i.e. Blind, Shaw, Darmian, etc etc
Interesting how all of the "keep Jose" people say that if we get an attack minded coach, we'll go down the table.I almost want us to get a flashy attack minded young manager in that plays sexy football for a season.
Everyone applauding his style and we end up 7th (see likes of Arsenal as an example).
Folks on here would be yearning for a more 'boring' results oriented manager. There is no winning.
People act as if SAF's team didn't grind out boring victories and draws...
Yes, that's a fair point.Interesting how all of the "keep Jose" people say that if we get an attack minded coach, we'll go down the table.
What if we got one and did better (whether points, position or trophies)?
I'm not saying Jose should go (or stay atm) but sometimes the grass CAN BE greener on the other side? If winning the occasional cup and playing generally dour football is what keeping Jose would mean, I'd flip.
I've got no idea who the alternative manager could be but we seem to have got to a stage where we want to stick because flipping hasn't worked so far.Yes, that's a fair point.
Interesting how all of the "keep Jose" people say that if we get an attack minded coach, we'll go down the table.
What if we got one and did better (whether points, position or trophies)?
I'm not saying Jose should go (or stay atm) but sometimes the grass CAN BE greener on the other side? If winning the occasional cup and playing generally don't football is what keeping Jose would mean, I'd flip.
Just say they're level with Sunderland on titles.Also feck being optimistic when I have to go to work tomorrow and get a load of shit off a load of city fans who I suspect (although can not prove) didn’t give a shit about the club until about seven years ago. feck being optimistic when I have to listen to Chris from finance going on about “the best team in Manchester” when I can’t say anything back because he’s just had three months off with stress and if I say anything I think he might kill himself. feck being optimistic when Karen “the massive Geordie” has to tell me how shit we are when she couldn’t identify Alan Shearer out of a line up of other sad middle age balding Geordie pricks.
I'm not seeing those kind of posts at all.Back when we used to laugh at Arsenal Mania, there was a poster on there that used to say, in defense of Wenger “Arsenal are 88th out of all the teams in England. If we aren’t doing well then what does that say for the other teams” and stuff along those lines.
I really do lament that those kinds of lines are trotted out on here now, when somehow the 60 odd clubs in the lower leagues are relevant to us somehow.
Cult of the manager.
I almost want us to get a flashy attack minded young manager in that plays sexy football for a season.
Everyone applauding his style and we end up 7th (see likes of Arsenal as an example).
Folks on here would be yearning for a more 'boring' results oriented manager. There is no winning.
People act as if SAF's team didn't grind out boring victories and draws...
Oh come on Pogue, it wasn't smash and grad all the time.With Liverpool and Spurs it’s not just about attractive football, it’s the way they are capable of going toe to toe with top teams and out-play them. Our results against big teams have been pretty damn good but it’s invariably been a smash and grab. And Manchester United shouldn’t be playing like under-dogs as often as we do under Mourinho.
I'm not seeing those kind of posts at all.
Any attack minded coach would see us competing for the league or just certain ones?With the players we have, attack-minded football would see us competing for the league. There’s no way that without our personnel, we should be so impotent against the worst side in the league. This game and Seville are just two examples of where we’ve embarrassed ourselves at OT by playing league two calibre football in games where we should be storming at the gates. Jose has bought good players and wasted them.
It’s LITERALLY the first post in the thread.
Also feck being optimistic when I have to go to work tomorrow and get a load of shit off a load of city fans who I suspect (although can not prove) didn’t give a shit about the club until about seven years ago. feck being optimistic when I have to listen to Chris from finance going on about “the best team in Manchester” when I can’t say anything back because he’s just had three months off with stress and if I say anything I think he might kill himself. feck being optimistic when Karen “the massive Geordie” has to tell me how shit we are when she couldn’t identify Alan Shearer out of a line up of other sad middle age balding Geordie pricks.
Sorry.
I mean then there aren't a lot of those around.
As above, I know an alternative isn't easy (or us or other clubs would have bagged him). I'm just not sure playing safe is the way to go, especially if it's based on a Europa Cup win (against poor opposition and when we were one blunder (from the opposition) of going out in the Semis).Its got nothing to do with 'keep Jose'. The reality is that the only manager that plays on the front foot in every game and gets more points than Mourinho regularly is Pep Guardiola.
Managers like Sarri and Tuchel are a big risk because they are not proven at the highest level.
If you want a manager to get the same results as Mourinho or better, you'll probably have to go for Simeone, Aleggri, Conte. All of those are not particularly attacking managers.
The only attacking option I see is Zidane.
So with Pogba it's not only Jose's fault or?I cba to go through all of that, people know my views and get sick of reading them. But that pogba bit is especially galling. “The manager agrees with me” and the player needs to “pull his socks up”. Mourinho got him in for 100 MILLION pounds. He should be winning us points regularly. That is a massive red flag that is not picked on enough. If I went into my work and spent the most money any company had ever spent on a new employee I then don’t get to a year later say “well maybe he should work harder”
This is slightly exaggerated, to be fair. His third season at Chelsea in his first stint was worse than the two previous years but still yielded an FA Cup and League Cup. His third season at Real Madrid was poor but probably not quite to the point where it could be called catastrophic. Only really his third season at his second stint at Chelsea can be seen in that way, I'd argue. Although I am concerned that while we've improved, Mourinho's not really been able to instantly elevate us to a title winning level in the way he did with Chelsea during his first stint there when he was at his managerial peak.
I almost want us to get a flashy attack minded young manager in that plays sexy football for a season.
Everyone applauding his style and we end up 7th (see likes of Arsenal as an example).
Folks on here would be yearning for a more 'boring' results oriented manager. There is no winning.
People act as if SAF's team didn't grind out boring victories and draws...
Where would we be in the table in pretty much almost every other season during another Premier League campaign?