Trequarista10
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2020
- Messages
- 2,740
One thing that is getting overlooked is the numerical disadvantage United continue to allow themselves to be in, which is even more compounded by the lack of technical abilities individually and overall by the central midfield.
A center forward closes down the ball, whether it is DDG or the CB. The wide outlets or the fullbacks are marked. The two central midfielders are easily marked as well. That leaves the CB available, but the CB then has to carry the ball into midfield and find a higher level outlet as in the CAM or forward players, but that's a longer pass and losing possession would leave your team in a vulnerable state because the shape is all wrong...which is how McTominay was at direct fault for the first goal.
What one poster correctly identified was that in pre-season, United were much more compact when playing from the back and had more options or clear outlets to get through not only a press, but just be available for passes and move the ball up the pitch. But when the live matches start like against Brighton, the spatial differences were drastic and nothing like pre-season training, but from the previous seasons.
Eriksen has the technical skill to positively influence a midfield when marked or press, but he still needs players around him to show for him and be close to him to play off of.
Overall, not even comparing the technical abilities of the players, City, Liverpool, Chelsea, and Spurs all have 5 players to play a high press against...based on a back 3 (Chelsea and Spurs) or a midfield 3 (City and Liverpool). To that, Chelsea, City, and Liverpool have exceptional fullback outlets or at least one (City - Walker, Cancelo; Liverpool - TAA, Robertson; Chelsea - James). And someone from a higher forward line is able to come deep and facilitate play and help make up the numbers such as Kane or Son at Spurs, City could be Haaland or more likely KDB because he's the best midfielder in the league, Liverpool have Salah.
Agree with this. I think it explains why ETH is/was so keen on De Jong, because he's a midfielder who looks to receive the ball deep and dribble past his marker when in a 1 vs 1 (or even 1 v 2), thus alleviating or bypassing the numerical disadvantage, and then having numerous players in advanced positions to go against the oppositions defence.
That type of midfielder is extremely rare though, so it requires an absolute diamond to pull it off. And I think even if you have that diamond midfielder, there still needs needs be more movement and connections with the rest of the team for balance, variation, and to minimise the risk when the ball is lost. The midfielder who is slightly more advanced, and the full backs, also need to be dropping deeper or infield so that a short pass or quick one-two is also available. Or, as you said, one of the forward line dropping into some space to become an outlet. I think Sancho in particular should be effective dropping inside and a little deeper to receive the ball. We have him starting high and wide to stretch the pitch, and to create space in the half-space for McTominay and Dalot. Firstly, Sancho would obviously be more dangerous in the half-space than either of those two, and would benefit from an overlapping right back/wing back (eg Hakimi) to create width. Secondly, although Sancho is decent 1 v 1, it's not his tendency or primary skill to look to run at the LB and go outside. As a result, the play is always fairly predictable, Sancho receives the ball, and ends up in a fairly static position, on the touchline, 30-40 yards from goal, looking to lay the ball into space for the oncoming McTominay or Dalot. It's largely a waste of Sancho's ability, and a sacrifice we're making to create space for two players who don't offer enough for it to be warranted. We're then susceptible on the break when the attack comes to an end, Fred isn't strong enough defensively when facing the opposition storming forwards, McTominay and Dalot don't have the recovery pace (or desire) to get back quick enough, or possibly the nous to sense the danger a couple seconds quicker and reposition themselves.
Personally, if Sancho is to play on the wing, I think we need him 10 yards infield, the RB overlapping, and the 8/RCM shielding behind them alongside the 6/LCM, instead of underlapping into Sancho's space.