- Joined
- Apr 24, 2014
- Messages
- 97
LMA bound to come out now following that Ince rubbish making some claim about racism being the reason he won't be Man Utd boss.
Wondering if Utd fans think Ferguson is at least partly behind the Solskjaer resurgence. He seems to be quite involved. Utd look like a Fergie side again to me. Winners.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/man-utd-solskjaer-mourinho-news-15674358
The only way, and it's still substantial, that Fergie is behind this is that he was Oles manager.
Anyone thinking Fergie is actually making the decisions is as crazy as those cnuts now boycotting Gillette
Me like. First striker did ok, don't you think? Let the second one continue... Our very own Mini Sir Alex.
Fergie was a handsome devil wasn't he? And i suppose the majority of Van Gaals goals must have come from headers, hes like a giraffe
Mourinho doesn’t even belong in that comparison. His playing credentials are non existent.
Fergie was a handsome devil wasn't he? And i suppose the majority of Van Gaals goals must have come from headers, hes like a giraffe
Delusion is the perfect word
Only worry is Poch changed up his system in the 2nd half which resulted in them dominating the game creating 5+ clear cut chances and our coaching staff failed to do anything to counter it.
We're lucky to have De Gea.
I think our players looked completely drained and that had a lot of influence.We had not answer to it at all. That really disappointed me too
Ole said that we lack pace and stamina for full 90 minutes. It was quite evident even against Cardiff.We had not answer to it at all. That really disappointed me too
Unfair to Ole that people require top 4 and/or CL win to get the job.
How many points were we behind when he took over?
He needs teams above us on the table to lose to keep the job, even games he can't affect, how fair is that?
I think he's doing well, he won me over so far, but i want to see if he can keep it up.
If we look this good, the players and staff are this happy, after 4-5 months, feck it, let's give it to him.
Don't forget Klopp's Mainz got relegated before that as well. If in the future any Liverpool fan tries to bring up Solskjaer's Cardiff getting relegated.'Snide little prick of a manager'?
Urgh, such a nasty bunch. How do you ever write that?
'How is the Molde manager going to be of sufficient managerial acumen in a league where Pep and Jurgen reign supreme?'
Well, after four years in the job, it looks like the manager who took Dortmund to seventh place in a two-horse race in Germany is threatening to win his first trophy. Anything is possible.
He’s had a remarkable career as a manager to be fair to him.Guy's a tit, but even by his standards....wow.
They'll change their tune at the end of the season when Pochettino confirms he's staying at Tottenham.Unfair to Ole that people require top 4 and/or CL win to get the job.
How many points were we behind when he took over?
He needs teams above us on the table to lose to keep the job, even games he can't affect, how fair is that?
I think he's doing well, he won me over so far, but i want to see if he can keep it up.
If we look this good, the players and staff are this happy, after 4-5 months, feck it, let's give it to him.
I think we did, we had those couple of Pogba chances. But their dominance in second half was so dangerous yes, and it shown how much we need a C.B, R.B and maybe a defensive midfielder too!We had not answer to it at all. That really disappointed me too
I'm sure Ferguson has spoken to Solskjaer and given him some advice but apart from that there isn't much Fergie can do from the sidelines. As a player who spent years under Ferguson during our most successful period it would be hard not to pick up some of the traits. I think people wanting to pin United's resurgence on Ferguson are just hoping it's that and Solskjaer's not actually a good manager because it ruins the Pochettino to United narrative.Wondering if Utd fans think Ferguson is at least partly behind the Solskjaer resurgence. He seems to be quite involved. Utd look like a Fergie side again to me. Winners.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/man-utd-solskjaer-mourinho-news-15674358
If we'd have finished our chances and been 3-0 up at the 60th minute we wouldn't have needed an answer to it. Also, the players were knackered, it's hard to make any changes when people can't run anymore.We had not answer to it at all. That really disappointed me too
Only because Dortmund saw a manager in him that spoke to their values as a club, much like Solskjaer does to usHe’s had a remarkable career as a manager to be fair to him.
Totally agree with this, been keeping track of this since Ole took over.Yeah I think he should be judged on points gained since he arrived. For instance if our form until the end of the season is league winning form and he still finishes outside the top four he he deserves the job imo.
I think our players looked completely drained and that had a lot of influence.
Remember when people were judging Pep on his ability to improve players and Mourinho's ability to make players worse?
Surely Solskjaer deserves credit for the way Rashford has developed over the last few weeks? We can also include Lindelof and Martial in that category.
I was talking about InceOnly because Dortmund saw a manager in him that spoke to their values as a club, much like Solskjaer does to us
I don't blame Jose for this, I believe our players were fit enough for Jose's game plan but not for the intensity and movement and high pressing that is required with Ole in charge now. We were sitting back most of the time and now we're moving all around the pitch, we will probably improve with time and Ole addressed that after the game so hopefully we're working on that.Why did our players look drained?
Surely, our team can't be that unfit that they are only capable of playing 45 minutes of football?
Many people would blame Jose for this, but keeping fit and having great stamina should be something that each player must take pride in (ie. in his own fitness).
I am not a paid professional athlete and off my own back, for free, no body to pay me, I run/cycle to ensure that my endurance and stamina are good. If I were paid, I'd take things to a whole new level.
Unless Jose specifically told our players that he wants them to be as unfit as possible, I put the blame squarely on the players, for this.
Why did our players look drained?
Surely, our team can't be that unfit that they are only capable of playing 45 minutes of football?
Many people would blame Jose for this, but keeping fit and having great stamina should be something that each player must take pride in (ie. in his own fitness).
I am not a paid professional athlete and off my own back, for free, no body to pay me, I run/cycle to ensure that my endurance and stamina are good. If I were paid, I'd take things to a whole new level.
Unless Jose specifically told our players that he wants them to be as unfit as possible, I put the blame squarely on the players, for this.
Solkjaer deserves credit for Rashford. He has benched Lukaku, in favour of Rashford.
Martial has not actually improved. He is the same as he was under Jose.
Lindelof was already improving under Jose and I see no difference, now that Solkjaer has arrived.
The difference that Solkjaer has brought is our style of play. The focus on attack, against smaller teams.
We've only played 1 big team since he arrived and we were pinned in our own half, relying on DDG's brilliance to keep us in the match. Solkjaer should not be given credit for this. In the 2nd half, Spurs cut through our midfield like it was nothing and were taking pot shots at our goal, with some ease. Poch changed the tide of the match at half time and that is something which he can take credit for. The way Spurs attacked us, was brutal and we had no tactic to counter this.
Poch would later go on to admit that the 2nd half performance was the best he has seen Spurs play, under him.
Solkjaer deserves credit for Rashford. He has benched Lukaku, in favour of Rashford.
Martial has not actually improved. He is the same as he was under Jose.
Lindelof was already improving under Jose and I see no difference, now that Solkjaer has arrived.
The difference that Solkjaer has brought is our style of play. The focus on attack, against smaller teams.
We've only played 1 big team since he arrived and we were pinned in our own half, relying on DDG's brilliance to keep us in the match. Solkjaer should not be given credit for this. In the 2nd half, Spurs cut through our midfield like it was nothing and were taking pot shots at our goal, with some ease. Poch changed the tide of the match at half time and that is something which he can take credit for. The way Spurs attacked us, was brutal and we had no tactic to counter this.
Poch would later go on to admit that the 2nd half performance was the best he has seen Spurs play, under him.
Ince wouldn't have brought the club together the way Ole has because Utd fans in general don't like Paul Ince.
I know I don't. cnut went mental celebrating thinking he'd cost us the title and the treble in 1999.
That's before mentioning he's a shitty manager.
Why did our players look drained?
Surely, our team can't be that unfit that they are only capable of playing 45 minutes of football?
Many people would blame Jose for this, but keeping fit and having great stamina should be something that each player must take pride in (ie. in his own fitness).
I am not a paid professional athlete and off my own back, for free, no body to pay me, I run/cycle to ensure that my endurance and stamina are good. If I were paid, I'd take things to a whole new level.
Unless Jose specifically told our players that he wants them to be as unfit as possible, I put the blame squarely on the players, for this.
Solkjaer deserves credit for Rashford. He has benched Lukaku, in favour of Rashford.
Martial has not actually improved. He is the same as he was under Jose.
Lindelof was already improving under Jose and I see no difference, now that Solkjaer has arrived.
The difference that Solkjaer has brought is our style of play. The focus on attack, against smaller teams.
We've only played 1 big team since he arrived and we were pinned in our own half, relying on DDG's brilliance to keep us in the match. Solkjaer should not be given credit for this. In the 2nd half, Spurs cut through our midfield like it was nothing and were taking pot shots at our goal, with some ease. Poch changed the tide of the match at half time and that is something which he can take credit for. The way Spurs attacked us, was brutal and we had no tactic to counter this.
Poch would later go on to admit that the 2nd half performance was the best he has seen Spurs play, under him.
Solkjaer deserves credit for Rashford. He has benched Lukaku, in favour of Rashford.
Martial has not actually improved. He is the same as he was under Jose.
Lindelof was already improving under Jose and I see no difference, now that Solkjaer has arrived.
The difference that Solkjaer has brought is our style of play. The focus on attack, against smaller teams.
We've only played 1 big team since he arrived and we were pinned in our own half, relying on DDG's brilliance to keep us in the match. Solkjaer should not be given credit for this. In the 2nd half, Spurs cut through our midfield like it was nothing and were taking pot shots at our goal, with some ease. Poch changed the tide of the match at half time and that is something which he can take credit for. The way Spurs attacked us, was brutal and we had no tactic to counter this.
Poch would later go on to admit that the 2nd half performance was the best he has seen Spurs play, under him.
I'm sure Ferguson has spoken to Solskjaer and given him some advice but apart from that there isn't much Fergie can do from the sidelines. As a player who spent years under Ferguson during our most successful period it would be hard not to pick up some of the traits. I think people wanting to pin United's resurgence on Ferguson are just hoping it's that and Solskjaer's not actually a good manager because it ruins the Pochettino to United narrative.
In short, if Fergie wanted to manage the team, he could have after Mourinho got sacked. Pretty sure Solskjaer wouldn't have taken the job to have someone else feeding his lines to him. Fergie hasn't exactly got a lot of time left as a working man so it makes sense to have him in and around the club for everyone to hear and see him, Solskjaer is just humble enough to know that he doesn't have to compete, the club is bigger than them both.
Pinned in our half? You do realise we were the better team for about 60 minutes before the players were exhausted. Don't understand why Pochettino is getting so much credit for being second best, at home for over an hour. They have a good 30 minutes (and don't score) and he's a tactical genius.Solkjaer deserves credit for Rashford. He has benched Lukaku, in favour of Rashford.
Martial has not actually improved. He is the same as he was under Jose.
Lindelof was already improving under Jose and I see no difference, now that Solkjaer has arrived.
The difference that Solkjaer has brought is our style of play. The focus on attack, against smaller teams.
We've only played 1 big team since he arrived and we were pinned in our own half, relying on DDG's brilliance to keep us in the match. Solkjaer should not be given credit for this. In the 2nd half, Spurs cut through our midfield like it was nothing and were taking pot shots at our goal, with some ease. Poch changed the tide of the match at half time and that is something which he can take credit for. The way Spurs attacked us, was brutal and we had no tactic to counter this.
Poch would later go on to admit that the 2nd half performance was the best he has seen Spurs play, under him.
Solkjaer deserves credit for Rashford. He has benched Lukaku, in favour of Rashford.
Martial has not actually improved. He is the same as he was under Jose.
Lindelof was already improving under Jose and I see no difference, now that Solkjaer has arrived.
The difference that Solkjaer has brought is our style of play. The focus on attack, against smaller teams.
We've only played 1 big team since he arrived and we were pinned in our own half, relying on DDG's brilliance to keep us in the match. Solkjaer should not be given credit for this. In the 2nd half, Spurs cut through our midfield like it was nothing and were taking pot shots at our goal, with some ease. Poch changed the tide of the match at half time and that is something which he can take credit for. The way Spurs attacked us, was brutal and we had no tactic to counter this.
Poch would later go on to admit that the 2nd half performance was the best he has seen Spurs play, under him.
Solkjaer deserves credit for Rashford. He has benched Lukaku, in favour of Rashford.
Martial has not actually improved. He is the same as he was under Jose.
Lindelof was already improving under Jose and I see no difference, now that Solkjaer has arrived.
The difference that Solkjaer has brought is our style of play. The focus on attack, against smaller teams.
We've only played 1 big team since he arrived and we were pinned in our own half, relying on DDG's brilliance to keep us in the match. Solkjaer should not be given credit for this. In the 2nd half, Spurs cut through our midfield like it was nothing and were taking pot shots at our goal, with some ease. Poch changed the tide of the match at half time and that is something which he can take credit for. The way Spurs attacked us, was brutal and we had no tactic to counter this.
Poch would later go on to admit that the 2nd half performance was the best he has seen Spurs play, under him.