It wasn't very realistic but I expect there will be a few coming in the summer, as normal.He's been outstanding but lets not kid ourselves, more than anything a caretaker has been brought in so the owners don't have to spend money this window!
As do I hope he succeeds but his tactical prowess will come under scrutiny a lot more in the games at the end of Feb and the whole of March, that's when we'll see if he's the right candidate for the job. The players on the fringe of the first team also need to prove they're worthy of keeping beyond the summer.Best to wait. I Was sceptical when he got the job and still am.
Should add that I really hope he succeed and get the job permanently.
He was sacked because he didn't deliver on the pitch and had the team play dour, Stoke football.Mourinho would be banging the door down for a CB, its one of the reasons he was sacked before the window opened.
Honestly no need to assess Val, Jones, Rojo etc. If you have paid somewhat attention to the game in the last two years you'd know they should be on their head out.As do I hope he succeeds but his tactical prowess will come under scrutiny a lot more in the games at the end of Feb and the whole of March, that's when we'll see if he's the right candidate for the job. The players on the fringe of the first team also need to prove they're worthy of keeping beyond the summer.
Our problem with the managerial situation is that Spurs will drag their heels over Poch, if it drags too far into the summer then we'll be left to rush into the summer market like when LvG took over. Plus, a new manager will also want to assess the squad, players like Jones, Young, Valencia, Mata and Rojo might get another season to prove themselves, this we can't afford as we need players who are going to improve us.
Wasn't it Paul Jewell while at Wigan when they were in the PL?Iain Dowie wasn't it?
I know it was just one mistake, but Pereira clearly isn't up to it in general. Hopefully he's learned more about his squad tonight.
Yet Valencia and Jones played regularly under every manager since SAF and under SAF, these players should've been upgraded 2 seasons ago minimum. Same problems are coming home to roost with our squad, they're either not good enough, their legs have gone or played out of position.Honestly no need to assess Val, Jones, Rojo etc. If you have paid somewhat attention to the game in the last two years you'd know they should be on their head out.
Jones need to go for injuries alone, Val's legs are gone, Rojo injured and not good enough. Get rid of Darmian and Fellaini? as well and we're in for a nice spring cleaning.Yet Valencia and Jones played regularly under every manager since SAF and under SAF, these players should've been upgraded 2 seasons ago minimum. Same problems are coming home to roost with our squad, they're either not good enough, their legs have gone or played out of position.
"One of the reasons"He was sacked because he didn't deliver on the pitch and had the team play dour, Stoke football.
Yes dear, I saw that"One of the reasons"
A bump if we manage to turn it around again against Leicester and Fulham. So disappointing though not to win but perhaps five more minutes would've seen us score a third.WWWWWWWWD is no disaster in anyone's books.
We conceded some sloppy goals but had a nice fightback to rescue a point. This is fine if it's a rare occurrence - City lost yesterday and are a much better team (for now) than us for example - and top 4 is still on. Hopefully this will light a bit of a fire in some of the players who went missing a bit yesterday.
I agree.Jones need to go for injuries alone, Val's legs are gone, Rojo injured and not good enough. Get rid of Darmian and Fellaini? as well and we're in for a nice spring cleaning.
Val was obviously good enough in the past and Jones although promising, maybe injuries ruined what SAF saw in him.
True, and three managers since 2013 has contributed to that. We shouldn't renew a few of these now and get them off the books.I agree.
Was good enough, we should've been proactive in replacing him early and not reactive, that's why we have so many players who aren't good enough.
WWWWWWWWD is no disaster in anyone's books.
We conceded some sloppy goals but had a nice fightback to rescue a point. This is fine if it's a rare occurrence - City lost yesterday and are a much better team (for now) than us for example - and top 4 is still on. Hopefully this will light a bit of a fire in some of the players who went missing a bit yesterday.
This is definitely something being missed here. 85+% win rate is pretty fecking good so far and it should have been a win last night only we couldn’t finish our dinner (the main issue, rather than the defence).In fairness to Ole, he's operating with minimal margin for error because we were so far from competing for top 4 prior to him taking over. He's taken on a team with low morale and got them back to winning ways.
If anyone offered us 8 wins and a draw from these 9 games we'd have taken the hand and all off the. Bigger tests lie ahead but he is performing way above expectations
Jose's United had 30 shots against Tottenham. 30. We lost 3-1.
The team was set up wrongly. Rashford is not a LW. Alexis should have started. Fred or McTominay should have started.
And its' not just "mighty me" who thinks Ole was tactically off. Is it now off limits to criticize a manager if we aren't managers ourselves? By that logic, nobody can discuss football at all.
If we win the next 2 games we are in a stronger position than any of us could have dreamed of after getting beat by Liverpool.
Exactly. Fergie never won the league by playing the same 11 every game. He rotated plenty, but the squad players were all up to the job.How come people don't seem to get that the players need rest through the season and Ole needs to check which players are up for the task in harder games? This was the perfect game for Pereira and others, at home in a team with 8 wins in a row.
Some just blew it.
Exactly. Fergie never won the league by playing the same 11 every game. He rotated plenty, but the squad players were all up to the job.
Last night just proved the alternative options aren't up to scratch. We need to sign 3-4 more players and push out the not required.
This post completely forgets SAF could motivate and get players to play at a level others simply cannot. Our teams were full of players 'not up to scratch' under him and still won...jesus some of his teams were laughed at (Arsenal in the cup line up) and still won.....course they lost as well, but the general point remains.
I see it the same way. Players fighting for a place in his team is exactly the spirit I want to see. A 2 year deal would be ideal. If it doesn't work out like we want it to, we don't have to pay 20m+ to get rid of him (even when I hope that this will not be the case)It’s clear the players want to play for him though and that is half the battle. I reckon we should sign Ole but not go mental and give him a massive contract, give two years and see what he can do.
Just like everyone knew it wouldn’t work with Alexis and Lukaku against Arsenal? Rashord played on the left because he is more versatile than Lukaku, still doesn’t absolve him for the horrendous finish. Had we been more clinical/decisive in the first half we wouldn’t be having this discussion.It wasn't really a risk tbh. We all knew it wasn't gonna work. Rashford is one of our most in-form players, why would you disrupt that by playing him on the left? Lukaku down the middle doesn't work but here were are trying it again.
Couldnt we just give him an extension of a year on his current one ?It’s clear the players want to play for him though and that is half the battle. I reckon we should sign Ole but not go mental and give him a massive contract, give two years and see what he can do.
Have you heard of the concept of a jinx? If we don't win tonight, I putting all the blame squarely on you.
Lukaku is better on the right than in the middle so yeah him playing there vs Arsenal made more sense in terms of getting the best out of him. Playing him in the middle isn't gonna suddendly gonna get him playing at his best. Playing Rashford on the left is rarely efficient.Just like everyone knew it wouldn’t work with Alexis and Lukaku against Arsenal? Rashord played on the left because he is more versatile than Lukaku, still doesn’t absolve him for the horrendous finish. Had we been more clinical/decisive in the first half we wouldn’t be having this discussion.
Lukaku plays down the middle because thats his natural role and why we spent 75m on him. Its not Ole’s fault that he is not very good at his role. Having said that, Lukaku had a fairly decent game yesterday and certainly wasn’t the reason we dropped points. That would be the clueless defence and a young midfielder who made a mistake.