Jinn
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2008
- Messages
- 2,085
Exactly. Now I'm going to bed @Aquire MeI think you misunderstood him judging by the bolded part. He wants consistency from the big players against 'lesser' teams too.
Exactly. Now I'm going to bed @Aquire MeI think you misunderstood him judging by the bolded part. He wants consistency from the big players against 'lesser' teams too.
Thing is, good games against top opposition is not out of the normal for Ole. Since he has taken over as manager, his record against the top six is probably up there. It doesn't paper over dropping points against shit opposition, but he deserves more credit than the current results provide.
That is the perfect example of it being an opinion. You think that, others do not, therefore it is your opinion.Top red alert
It's not an opinion - Ole is out of his depth.
You are not a true United fan if you are happy watching the club languishing in the bottom half of the table with a manager who belongs in a tier 5 league. That's not disrespectful to him either, that's just his level as a manager. The signings were par for the course, but even with £130m of reinforcements Ole can't get a tune out of the defence. The performances are going backwards, injuries or not. The players' belief in Ole and his plan has evaporated. Culture my arse. And no one we'd want to sign is going to want to come to the club at this point in time to play for Ole. Them's the facts.
It's an understandable reaction to the relentless negativity that has swamped this forum for too long now.
Nobody is (or should be) getting carried away but it's a good day to be a United fan, and some fuel to the belief that some of us have that there is a foundation to a potentially very good team here, and we should let this play out.
Nothing more than that.
Thing is, good games against top opposition is not out of the normal for Ole. Since he has taken over as manager, his record against the top six is probably up there. It doesn't paper over dropping points against shit opposition, but he deserves more credit than the current results provide.
Yep, so nice to see.So many disappointed United 'fans' tonight. Beautiful.
Fair fecks. And I don't begrudge it.
Trouble is (and I'm not saying this is equivalent) there are a lot of managers of mid-table teams who have a great record against the top 6. It's almost the identifying definition of a West Ham, or a Wigan, or a Wolves, or any side managed by Big Sam in the 00s... It doesn't make them good sides, or good managers, if anything it defines them even stricter as game raising also rans, who don't have any consistency. The measure of a great, title challenging side is not their record against the top 6 (unless they're in a real fight to the death, and they're the deciding factors) its the consistency of their results against everyone else..particularly at home....
Both LVG and Jose had great records against the top 6... yet no one would say that justified their tenures! They failed because they were horrifically inconsistent in all the other games, against also-ran teams that didn't open up to them, or let them play.
Ole isn't doing anything out of the ordinary by over-achieving in these big games. If anything he's scoring a lot less than the equvalent LVGs sides did... But he's still massively under-performing in all the other games. The same other games that actually mattered. The ones that actually got LVG and Jose sacked.... Jose beat Juve away at the lowest point of his reign... Did that prove anything? No.
We need a lot more than a rousing home performance against a quasi-rival who've also been quite shite lately... which we won with a pentaly.... to take any kind of genuine cocksure confidence from games like this. Sorry.
Why are you laughing. Maybe I didn't explain myself properly
Fair enough, agree with some of that but how do you explain the inconsistency of Mo and LVG with experienced, full internationals players.Fair fecks. And I don't begrudge it.
Trouble is (and I'm not saying this is equivalent) there are a lot of managers of mid-table teams who have a great record against the top 6. It's almost the identifying definition of a West Ham, or a Wigan, or a Wolves, or any side managed by Big Sam in the 00s... It doesn't make them good sides, or good managers, if anything it defines them even stricter as game raising also rans, who don't have any consistency. The measure of a great, title challenging side is not their record against the top 6 (unless they're in a real fight to the death, and they're the deciding factors) its the consistency of their results against everyone else..particularly at home....
Both LVG and Jose had great records against the top 6... yet no one would say that justified their tenures! They failed because they were horrifically inconsistent in all the other games, against also-ran teams that didn't open up to them, or let them play.
Ole isn't doing anything out of the ordinary by over-achieving in these big games. If anything he's scoring a lot less than the equvalent LVGs sides did... But he's still massively under-performing in all the other games. The same other games that actually mattered. The ones that actually got LVG and Jose sacked.... Jose beat Juve away at the lowest point of his reign... Did that prove anything? No.
We need a lot more than a rousing home performance against a quasi-rival who've also been shite lately, which we won with a pentaly, to take any genuine cocksure confidence from games like this. It just will. Sorry.
This place....we won after one month without win, in last 10 days we were dominated by two last year's championship teams but it is total hysteria because we won a home game against Spurs. We deserve to have Ole. No question about that
Nor is it an ambition of mine. Theres more to life than pats on the back on redcafeThere's not much danger going by his posts.
We were on quite a good run of form until McTominay got injured and left our midfield wide open for 2 games.I'm happy for him but there's no doubt that he's not good enough for us. One game does not change that. Are people actually saying we should be fickle and flip flop game by game.
Van Gaal also did well against the big teams. Does that mean we should've kept him too?
I'm happy for him but there's no doubt that he's not good enough for us. One game does not change that. Are people actually saying we should be fickle and flip flop game by game.
Van Gaal also did well against the big teams. Does that mean we should've kept him too?
Thing is though, both LVG and Mourinho had that inconsistency with teams full of established stars. They're no where near in the same bracket as Ole where he has decided to invest and trust in youth who will make mistakes and lose us points (see williams on the weekend).
Average age of the front six today was something like 23 yeras old. I dont expect consistency from that group of players so going up and down is expected. I think it needs to be reiterated again that the class of 92 walked into established teams of great players. They were immediately performed because they had Keane, Cantona, Schmeichael, Irwin, Giggs etc around them. Ole doesn't have that same luxury so it will be one or two years before those players are capable of replicating solid teams of the past.
Fair enough, agree with some of that but how do you explain the inconsistency of Mo and LVG with experienced, full internationals players.
Ole's teams have plenty of kids this season (yes due injury).
No, but then that's also a situation of his own making, that he is somehow being absolved of? We're pretending we're in a "transition season" when in fact we only have 3 new players, 2 of whom were first teamers in their previous sides, and one of whom was a star of England's WC side, when the likes of Atletico Madrid or Bayern have signed 9 new players!....
And as you say, the class of 92 weren't expected to hold up the first XI... and thats part of the reason they were integrated so well... So is it actually automatically such a good thing for Ole to be integrating these players in frustratingly incompetent losing sides? Does that actually benefit them? Or is it merely just a good excuse for why we're a bit shit!?
Feckign missed the game. Sounds like it was a very good game. I'm still Ole in but was almost about to push the exit button last Sunday. I will give him more time for now .
You were right. This is Lingard and Jones thread all over again. One good game in 10 and this place is swarmed by "top reds" with "feck you all doubters" posts.Put your seat belt on.
Huge win for him tonight, and the knee-jerk reaction to the win from fanbase and board will, I imagine, ensure we miss out on Pochettino.
Glad for the win but can't say I'm convinced.
He just has this habit of delaying the inevitable imo. And I believe he'll be sacked next season while Arsenal employ a proper manager - quite possibly Pochettino.
Still, good luck to him.
There are transitions and transitions. This one requires a mass exodus and gradual replacement. He clearly hasn't the clout to demand the cash that will allow these replacements to arrive en masse. We're not JUST losing to Bournemouth, we've got a scattering of good performances in there, certainly more exciting games than I've seen in recent times, more goals, more ambition, more mistakes maybe but certainly progress of a sort. And the young guys are central to the whole thing. Look, it's not all strawberries and cream but there's enough in there to give me some hope. Even one real, shrewd addition in January in the right area could give us a proper push. It's not Moyes. Or LVG, or Jose. I've got more from the glimpses of hope this season than anything I've seen in a while.No, but then that's also a situation of his own making, that he is somehow being absolved of? We're pretending we're in a "transition season" when in fact we only have 3 new players, 2 of whom were first teamers in their previous sides, and one of whom was a star of England's WC side, when the likes of Atletico Madrid or Bayern have signed 9 new players!....
And as you say, the class of 92 weren't expected to hold up the first XI... and thats part of the reason they were integrated so well... So is it actually automatically such a good thing for Ole to be integrating these players in frustratingly incompetent losing sides? Does that actually benefit them? Or is it merely just a good excuse for why we're a bit shit!?
See above. The West Ham team that produced Lampard, Ferdinand and Cole were also ideologically heavy on youth promotion... Man Utd aren't an entirely unique team in that regard. What makes us so special, is that we've managed to win big trophies with sides built on youth.... But if we aren't doing that...and all we're doing is losing to Bournmouth away with a bunch of our own kids... Does that makes us the legendary Manchester United? Or does it just makes us West Ham?... Or Southhampton?... Or Feyenoord.... Or Anderlecth?....etc, etc, etc.
I love Ole as much as the next guy...But when someone says "hey, we've tried two big managers, why not try doing it the United way!?".... What about that is actually that different than Ferguson appointing Moyes in 2013, and us all slavishly sticking by that stupid fecking idea out of pure ideological loyalty, for as long as humanly possible, because he played Januzaj for a bit!?... Until it just became to obvious that it wasn't working. And by the time we realised, it was too late to enact any real, significant change?
ThisThis is PSG all over again and eventually we'll reap what we sow.
The standards are so low, that a win at home against Tottenham Hotspurs is seen as a season defining moment
5 wins all in the league but hey we performed against the big boys.
Small time mentality
Is that the word right word though? That’s not how I recall it. And yes, we do deserve to have Ole. I’m pretty sure roughly half of the fans are happy with him while the other half want him gone tonight. As long as Woody believes in him, he will keep his job, regardless of what random fans on RedCafe think.This place....we won after one month without win, in last 10 days we were dominated by two last year's championship teams but it is total hysteria because we won a home game against Spurs. We deserve to have Ole. No question about that
Didn't we beat Brighton and one of the Europa teams last month?This place....we won after one month without win, in last 10 days we were dominated by two last year's championship teams but it is total hysteria because we won a home game against Spurs. We deserve to have Ole. No question about that
Better than what we've had available this season? Yes it is. They also have options to change things around (Pedro, Giroud, Batshuayi, Hudson Odoi, Barkley) which we don't.A great result, and well-deserved by Ole, but the fact is that we didn't create much more than they did. It feels like we did because Rashford's strikes from distance were on target, but our chance-creation still sucks. And if we don't create more than our opposition then our results will vary from amazing to crappy - which is exactly what we are experiencing.
Here's the question: is Chelsea's front six better man-for-man than ours? I'm not sure it is. But their chance-creation is much better. I'd hate to credit that to Lampard - can't stand him - but they're doing something better than we are.