Andycoleno9
matchday malcontent
Our standards are low as it goes. People are happy with draw against SU with being dominated too. Sad timesYou do realise a draw away against SU is still dreadful? You would have had a point if United had won.
Our standards are low as it goes. People are happy with draw against SU with being dominated too. Sad timesYou do realise a draw away against SU is still dreadful? You would have had a point if United had won.
He was clearly playing in midfield.They were done, 3 goals in 7 minutes and couldn’t get out of their half we was under zero pressure. Add to that Axel was at the back as well not midfield and it was a daft move, we showed in the first half 3 at the back wasn’t working.
None of this is a party, or remotely fun. It's fecking excruciating @meamth, that's the point.
You want to put a 19 year old with less than 5 first team appearances, in none of which he was particularly solid defensively, in a team which already contains two 19 year olds, both of them fairly offensive minded, to defend the lead in an away game against an in form, fairly psyhical opposition?
Defenders can play in midfield. SAF once played 7 defenders in a team, it doesn't mean we played 7 at the back.
We had one attack after taking the lead. We would drop back inevitably. It happens pretty much every time.He came on with 10 minutes left... And before Sheff Utd had even start to peg us back.
We were still looking threatening and causing them problems. That sub basically told them to not worry about us attacking them and that they could come onto us.
It also meant we had to rely on our shoddy defense for 10 mins.
It's the sort of sub you make in injury time to waste time and after you're being pinned back... You don't use it to invite pressure.
Our standards are low as it goes. People are happy with draw against SU with being dominated too. Sad times
He's significantly more experienced than Garner, to argue otherwise would be just dumb and demonstrably wrong.Yeah because Tuanzebe is an experienced PL defender ? He has played only in Championship in few loans at best. We were bringing a youngster regardless so put the right one in his right position at least. If he fecks it up then it'll be his problem not the manager.
The only one's I've seen celebrating it are those happy that Ole didn't get the win, because there's a not insignificant number of "supporters" posting on here.As much as I thought we'd lose today, people celebrating a draw are just baffling. The standards are so low.
Exactly!The fact that people are having a go at him after going from 0-2 to 3-2 because he put on a defensive player in injury time...fecking hell. Really?
You're only just realising now? Where have you been for the past year?Not is he not good enough for, he's a bad fit here. He's nothing more than a defensive coach. To start with 5 at the back, switch to attacking football and as soon as we lead Ole switches to 5 at the back again, you really make it up.
He is honestly clueless, sorry to say. We need to move on now
This is when the Ole out camp comes out to party.
Yeah yeah, we hear ya, incompetent, clueless, whatever.
Have fun.
He's significantly more experienced than Garner, to argue otherwise would be just dumb.
Ole urgently needs to grow a moustache. He'd look more authorative and less like an U-23's manager with a moustache.
We expended so much energy with 3 quick attacks in 70 mins that we couldn't keep possession in that system?
You defend Ole, but then you go on to suggest he hasn't coached his players to press properly, which is also something that takes a lot of energy?
If you're unhappy with the draw, who is to blame ultimately then? The buck stops with the manager, does it not?That's the thing, Ole in's camp aren't happy at all about the draw.
What's the idea here? We need to be in Ole out camp to portray our sadness???
He literally switched back to a formation that had seen us concede twice and been battered for 70 minutes. You'd have to be a complete idiot to do thatExactly!
He would have been criticised had he not tried to close shop and Sheffield equalised. Jose did this most games and he's a great tactician in many minds. Hindsight makes great coaches.
Except for when it's Poch, I guess, then there's all manner of excuses.If you're unhappy with the draw, who is to blame ultimately then? The buck stops with the manager, does it not?
We looked bad because we had no flipping midfieldI'm not sure Martial substitution is a tactical mistake. A fair question would be why we were looking so bad over the majority of the game.
Spot on.Exactly!
He would have been criticised had he not tried to close shop and Sheffield equalised. Jose did this most games and he's a great tactician in many minds. Hindsight makes great coaches.
He's fallen into the trap addiction that is scoring off counters.got the lead and went straight back to 3 at the back to invite pressure
True. Double standards are rampant over hereExcept for when it's Poch, I guess, then there's all manner of excuses.
Our standards are low as it goes. People are happy with draw against SU with being dominated too. Sad times
Maybe should have spent 130£m on the attack. He might have a job next summer.
I don't understand. Managers can come to the end of a cycle at a club, it doesn't mean they are bad managers.Except for when it's Poch, I guess, then there's all manner of excuses.
We had one attack after taking the lead. We would drop back inevitably. It happens pretty much every time.
Our 3rd was scored in the 80th minute, not the 70th. The game ebbs and flows, just because you're on top for a spell doesn't mean you can maintain that for the remainder of the game, we had to compensate for the fact that Sheffield were going to come on strong.
It's not a matter of pressing, it's initial positioning, I think the players are encouraged to pack the box in that situation which not only invites pressure but infact requires greater effort to close down wide players when they invariably spot this and take all the time they need to play the best cross. It's the opposite of what you're saying. It's energy-conserving to maintain presence in wide areas there.
It doesn't seem rational to me that you could disregard Ole as a fundamentally flawed manager on that basis, he has to learn how to see out games for sure but that's not a basic understanding you'd automatically expect any manager to have otherwise very few goals would ever be conceded from winning positions late in the game, he has to be given the time to learn from his mistakes.
It makes all the difference in the world if you're defending the lead with 10 minutes to go. It's literally the one thing that's useful about experience, you can handle situations easier if you already experienced it.Neither are experienced in PL though.
And weren't we playing inexperienced Williams ahead of Ashley Young in FB position anyway ? This experience point makes no sense when this is happening.
Honestly your argument is weird. The sub brought them into the game. If that wasn't a bad sub I don't know what is a bad one.
You'll be disappointed soon then. Solskjaer is a defensive coach by nature. Expecting him to suddenly start being attacking when we've been a defensive counter-attacking team throughout his year here is a bit strange to me.Poor decision to start with a back 3, hopefully he's learnt to never use it again. Particularly if it means using Phil Jones there (although it was a foul on him for the goal).
Injuries are still killing us, the sooner Pereira isn't starting games for us the better.
I expected a tough game, Sheff Utd were excellent.
How exactly is going back to the formation and system we struggled with in the first half not a tactical mistake? He literally laid out the red carpet for them.I'm not sure Martial substitution is a tactical mistake. A fair question would be why we were looking so bad over the majority of the game.