Bilbo
TeaBaggins
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2004
- Messages
- 14,597
Nobody is doing themselves or anyone else any favours by comparing X with Y here. There is only one metric that Ole needs to be measured by and that is what he is doing with the resources under his control.
The folly of a football fan is to be kneejerk about almost everything. We had a very bad run and the pitchforks were out. We had numerous posters claiming that relegation was a possibility and also stupid threads asking for votes on whether Ole was the worth manager in the Premier League. It was an embarrassment and trying to defend or support Ole during this period was akin to standing in front of a firing squad. Now we have a few good results and it tilts the other way. Ole is better than X and only good things can happen from here on it.
None of this is helpful. Its important that we keep looking at this as what it is - a long term project. We should evaluate this over a longer period of time, otherwise the cycle will remain as it is. Lose to Bournemouth and its open season on the whole club. Beat them and its the opposite. With the fine margins that can swing a result one way or the other in any game its foolish to look at things that way. There is a limit to what Ole or anyone can achieve with this squad as it currently stands. Winning a few matches doesn't suddenly mean than we aren't a very light squad with some major issues.
So with that being said what are we seeing that is fair to evaluate? Obviously this is subjective and not everyone will agree, but for my two cents I think we have seen enough evidence now to suggest that:
The folly of a football fan is to be kneejerk about almost everything. We had a very bad run and the pitchforks were out. We had numerous posters claiming that relegation was a possibility and also stupid threads asking for votes on whether Ole was the worth manager in the Premier League. It was an embarrassment and trying to defend or support Ole during this period was akin to standing in front of a firing squad. Now we have a few good results and it tilts the other way. Ole is better than X and only good things can happen from here on it.
None of this is helpful. Its important that we keep looking at this as what it is - a long term project. We should evaluate this over a longer period of time, otherwise the cycle will remain as it is. Lose to Bournemouth and its open season on the whole club. Beat them and its the opposite. With the fine margins that can swing a result one way or the other in any game its foolish to look at things that way. There is a limit to what Ole or anyone can achieve with this squad as it currently stands. Winning a few matches doesn't suddenly mean than we aren't a very light squad with some major issues.
So with that being said what are we seeing that is fair to evaluate? Obviously this is subjective and not everyone will agree, but for my two cents I think we have seen enough evidence now to suggest that:
- Ole (and staff) are not the tactical dinosaurs that some will have us believe
- The squad appears to be unified - bad apples have been removed
- All 3 summer signings continue to appear to be astute purchases - the right type of player/character for the club
- We are getting a good look at some of our young talent. One or two are showing that they have it, others perhaps not and others still need some time but the minutes and experience are going to aid their development
- Our strongest XI is actually a pretty strong side and a good foundation for what we want to do over the next 3 windows