Ole Gunnar Solskjær | 2021/22 Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Buy 3 quality players asap, Striker/Winger/CM and see where it goes, If the results doesnt improve then go for a decent experienced manager.

It's that simple, I dont know why people at top cant understand this.
Agreed that we made many transfer mistakes in last 6 years so its time to rectify it and move on.
 
We are merely game-raising cnuts though:
8 points against Chelsea, Leicester, Arsenal & Liverpool.
2 against Wolves, CP, Southampton, West Ham & Newcastle.

I'll be surprised if we are not farther away by the end of these 4 games.
Could be. I mean, at some point we'll surely start winning a few games. Even in our worse seasons post SAF we tend to hover between 5th to 8th.
 
We are merely game-raising cnuts though:
8 points against Chelsea, Leicester, Arsenal & Liverpool.
2 against Wolves, CP, Southampton, West Ham & Newcastle.

I'll be surprised if we are not farther away by the end of these 4 games.

We struggle against low block defensive sides because our attackers need space to be effective. That's the key reason that the results look the way they do.

The next 4 - 5 games are against lesser sides that are more expansive so in theory we should see an improvement in results, if not then I really see it being the end of the road for Ole. We'll have Pogba and Martial back too. Even Sheffield United put on a high press which if broken can lead to good break away opportunities.
 
We are merely game-raising cnuts though:
8 points against Chelsea, Leicester, Arsenal & Liverpool.
2 against Wolves, CP, Southampton, West Ham & Newcastle.

I'll be surprised if we are not farther away by the end of these 4 games.

It's not that we're game-raising cnuts but that this team is good to play only the underdog role, i.e. when it is not expected to dominate.

Ole doesn't seem to know how to coach possession based attacking football which we are expected to play against most teams in the league.
 
As much as he's not the right man, I think plenty of managers would struggle to get a tune out of certainly our current midfield, which is an embarrassment for a PL side. We've certainly been setup to fail with our current squad, and it depends who you put the blame on. No manager should have accepted to go into the season with the players we have right now.
 
We struggle against low block defensive sides because our attackers need space to be effective. That's the key reason that the results look the way they do.

The next 4 - 5 games are against lesser sides that are more expansive so in theory we should see an improvement in results, if not then I really see it being the end of the road for Ole. We'll have Pogba and Martial back too. Even Sheffield United put on a high press which if broken can lead to good break away opportunities.
I expect those teams to adapt while playing United; almost everyone knows now what this United team can and cannot do.

It's not that we're game-raising cnuts but that this team is good to play only the underdog role, i.e. when it is not expected to dominate.

Ole doesn't seem to know how to coach possession based attacking football which we are expected to play against most teams in the league.
But that's exactly what raising game means: being more determined when playing the big boys. Rashford was the best example: he couldn't be arsed to even make rudimentary runs against Newcastle but against Liverpool he was all bustle. Of course, most of our fans buy it.

Agree about Ole's inability to coach.
 
I expect those teams to adapt while playing United; almost everyone knows now what this United team can and cannot do.


But that's exactly what raising game means: being more determined when playing the big boys. Rashford was the best example: he couldn't be arsed to even make rudimentary runs against Newcastle but against Liverpool he was all bustle. Of course, most of our fans buy it.

Agree about Ole's inability to coach.

He was rested a bit during International week. He played only 17 mins against the Czech and 70 odd minutes in a won game and low tempo against Bulgaria. Scored a good goal and brought some of his confidence back.
 
He was rested a bit during International week. He played only 17 mins against the Czech and 70 odd minutes in a won game and low tempo against Bulgaria. Scored a good goal and brought some of his confidence back.
Fair enough; it's hard to wipe the memory of how bad that Newcastle performance was.
 
But the fact of the matter is, SAF never put himself in a position where he solely relied on kids. That season in 2006/07, he brought in 33 year old Solskjaer & 36 year old Larsson. I'm sure he had an idea about what Jose was talking about.

We also still had 28 year old Saha & 25 year old Smith. Look at the rest of that squad; 36 VDS, 33 Giggs, 32 Scholes, 31 Neville, 28 Heinze & Ferdinand, 25 year old Park, Carrick & Evra. Absolute ton's of experience still.

That's how you develop young talents whilst not dropping your standards.

Agreed on all points.
And this just shows Ole's inexperience at managing a club which is expected to compete for trophies.
It's easy to make these radical changes and finish in the bottom half of the table (or even get relegated), but it's not easy to bring in the youth AND compete for trophies.
 
It depends, I think a lot more coaches seem to be philosophy driven these days.
Fair enough, will be interesting to see what those games are like. But you are right: if United don't get 8-10 points from them, top 4 will be gone and Ole's position should be untenable.
 
Love Solskjaer.

Want him to resign with his head held high knowing he tried and gave his all.

Ultimately he isn't good enough but I would be sad seeing him sacked.
 
It's not that we're game-raising cnuts but that this team is good to play only the underdog role, i.e. when it is not expected to dominate.

Ole doesn't seem to know how to coach possession based attacking football which we are expected to play against most teams in the league.
Agree with this.
 
Both of them played together a long time before their respective injuries and we were still shit. Pogba wants out of the club and Martial's body language when he is not in the mood leaves much to be desired. A lot of people will be disappointed to have pinned their hopes on them reviving us.
In the league, we scored 1.71 goals per game last season under Ole. This season we are on 1.11 per game, and that's including the 4 goals vs Chelsea, a game in which they were both involved. Look at our alternatives when they are injured, I think you may be underrating their importance.

I expect them to improve us when they are back, whether it will be enough I'll leave unanswered.
 
I don't get how so many have short memories. As you said, they've played many times in this poor run since Ole got made permanent. Hell we actually achieved another decent performance against the odds last season vs PSG and people were saying the exact same then. "We should only get better when Pogba is back", but it didn't work out that way at all. He came back at the same time our season imploded once again.
Perhaps the short term memory ignores the games that came before PSG? ;) Regardless, it shouldn't be controversial to expect us to look better with two of our best attacking players returning. Do you not think they would make any difference?
 
Perhaps the short term memory ignores the games that came before PSG? ;) Regardless, it shouldn't be controversial to expect us to look better with two of our best attacking players returning. Do you not think they would make any difference?

I think you are overestimating the run before PSG. We were likely to drop points in many games and that luck Ole seems to be adamant about was with us at the time, along with the confidence of a winning streak.

Still can't believe we managed to win at Spurs - they completely battered us and DDG has his last worldie till date.
 
I think you are overestimating the run before PSG. We were likely to drop points in many games and that luck Ole seems to be adamant about was with us at the time, along with the confidence of a winning streak.

Still can't believe we managed to win at Spurs - they completely battered us and DDG has his last worldie till date.

Before they even had chance, we should have put the game to bed. We missed few easy chances too, they went all out attack around 65th min mark, as any good team at home would do.
 
I think you are overestimating the run before PSG. We were likely to drop points in many games and that luck Ole seems to be adamant about was with us at the time, along with the confidence of a winning streak.

Still can't believe we managed to win at Spurs - they completely battered us and DDG has his last worldie till date.
These same arguments hold up in the other direction for our lesser run. Anyway, this was about Pogba and Martial, and whether they will improve us going forward.
 
Perhaps the short term memory ignores the games that came before PSG? ;) Regardless, it shouldn't be controversial to expect us to look better with two of our best attacking players returning. Do you not think they would make any difference?

The thing is, you'd expect a managers influence to show more as time goes on. There's other factors to consider with those first games under Ole, especially when it comes to motivation of the players. If I'm honest, I felt there were plenty of poor performances in that winning run too, Solskjaer said the same himself, but they all seem to get lumped in with the Cardiff performance where the football was free-flowing.

In answer to your question, all I'm saying is it's not guaranteed. The thing with Pogba, which some won't admit, is that he wouldn't have brought the same energy and resolute performance that we saw from our midfield at the weekend and vs PSG. He might bring more quality, he might continue to frustrate. He's an enigma really. The same goes for Martial too. More quality than Rashford but less determination, so when the quality isn't shining through, what are you left with? A passenger really. He looked good earlier in the season, but that is a small drop in the ocean compared to his performances over the last few years. Including after Ole got made permanent.
 
No, because of your reply. I notice how you ignored Ron Atkinson. Fergie took years to create his dominating sides, he almost got the sack too. As I said before, United do not have a god given right to win. All I ask is they challenge and do so with style and commitment. Your comments disregard the history and ethos of this club as it has always built rather than bought. Mourinho and LvG were two of the greatest managers in the world and where did they get us?

Ole may not be the best but he has a true love for this club and he should be given a fair chance. So far he has massively improved the defence, bought three very exciting players and he has got rid of some overpriced dead wood in Lukaku and Sanchez. He's also giving the youngsters a chance and trying to get United back playing a fast attacking style. The trouble is the modern football fans want to see galacticos, £100m transfers for every position and to win at all costs, they don't afford time and expect it all instantly. Yes I agree Ole is inexperienced and yes I agree he's making mistakes BUT his ethos is spot on and I can see what he's trying to do. He knows and loves United and knows how the club should be run and how the football should be played. The disrespect Ole gets is disgusting imho. Personally though I wish he hadn't taken the job as his legacy could be tarnished and he doesn't deserve that.

1) SAF Comparison.. as mentioned elsewhere by others please stop. Ole is not SAF, he’s not even Sam Allerdyce who actually keeps crap teams up.

2) Deadwood Young, Jones, still at the club, ask anyone in May who are the deadwood none would have said Herrera, Lukaku, or even Fellaini if you asked in Dec. Yes Fellaini and Lukaku were people would have liked to have seen sold and replaced with more technical players. But the way Ole got rid of them showed his naivety.

3) Win at all cost. Ole falls into this category. Although he rarely succeeds. He turns into Wimbledon against big teams, and to keep himself in a job talks as he’s a Pep like coach with a deep style of playing. After 10 months it’s obvious he doesn’t have his own unique ideas

4) He knows and loves United.... great let’s pick a random from the fan at OT and make him manager. Tbh, what had Ole said that fans haven’t been saying before he was made manager. We need to play a fluid front 3, drop Lukaku give Martial/ Rashford more chances, buy players who become world class at United. All stuff fans say... Very easy to say, the doing is hard.

5) Disrespect Ole gets.... A teacher giving a student a fail is not disrespect.
 
These same arguments hold up in the other direction for our lesser run. Anyway, this was about Pogba and Martial, and whether they will improve us going forward.
We'd definitely better off with Martial and Pogba than without them. But my guess something like 8th instead of 14th. With of without those two, Ole appears to simply be an average football manager.
 
1) SAF Comparison.. as mentioned elsewhere by others please stop. Ole is not SAF, he’s not even Sam Allerdyce who actually keeps crap teams up.

2) Deadwood Young, Jones, still at the club, ask anyone in May who are the deadwood none would have said Herrera, Lukaku, or even Fellaini if you asked in Dec. Yes Fellaini and Lukaku were people would have liked to have seen sold and replaced with more technical players. But the way Ole got rid of them showed his naivety.

3) Win at all cost. Ole falls into this category. Although he rarely succeeds. He turns into Wimbledon against big teams, and to keep himself in a job talks as he’s a Pep like coach with a deep style of playing. After 10 months it’s obvious he doesn’t have his own unique ideas

4) He knows and loves United.... great let’s pick a random from the fan at OT and make him manager. Tbh, what had Ole said that fans haven’t been saying before he was made manager. We need to play a fluid front 3, drop Lukaku give Martial/ Rashford more chances, buy players who become world class at United. All stuff fans say... Very easy to say, the doing is hard.

5) Disrespect Ole gets.... A teacher giving a student a fail is not disrespect.
The SAF thing is the worst. Let's give every manager plenty of time no matter how useless they are because... SAF. I wonder if the same posters believe we don't need to improve the 'structure' because it worked for SAF. Or why we should stick to 442 because.. SAF. Jaysus, move with the times people. Manchester United is a bigger beast now. We have to have high standards because we've been managed by the great man. Rather than pretending he never came when it comes to standards and accountability and remembering he did when it comes to assuming everyone to be his clone.

Also people go on and on about the hand he's been dealt. But he obviously decided this squad was fine for a top 4 challenge. And were in 14th place. Either he's done a miserable job or he's an awful judge of what he has. Or a bit of both. Either way, it doesn't show him in good light.

Agree with you other points too. We do owe Ole anything other than gratitude for his achievements as a player. As a manager he's a professional who should be seen as in that manner.
 
Ole is not making the cut he will not be a successful manager in any highly competitive environment. Doesn't have the makeup or the acumen to carry him along.

Second worst manager in the league facts.
 
This narrative of him being clueless is lazy criticism. I trust the judgement of someone who's lived and breathed professional football for 30 years over armchair tacticians who are demanding Angel Gomes start in every prematch thread.

Moyes philosophy was to get to the line and cross. He removed vital back room staff, failed to motivate his team with bizarre training routines and poor man management, and chased targets who were either unobtainable or unneeded, sometimes both. Could we describe him as clueless. I dont think so. Old fashioned, unprepared and maybe ill advised, but a man with his career isn't clueless on how to manage a football club.

LVG, to his credit turned us in the right direction but didn't back up his possession orientated philosophy with the right signings. In fact, some of his signings directly contradicted the method he wanted to implement and stifled our progress into becoming a possesion based team.

Jose never really settled on a philosophy, as is his pragmatic way. But the football was often dull and our most memorable tactics where using Fellaini to either bully back posters or break up the play on the edge of our area to shutdown a game. His downfall was poor man management, (which almost resulted in squad mutiny) and attempting to force questionable short sighted transfer business.

In comparison, Ole and his staff do have a method of playing despite what 'armchair tacticians' say. He has backed up this method with his transfer business and team selections. And he has maintained the support of the his staff and sqaud despite a poor run in form.

He's not a master tactician, and that's not what we need at the moment. We just need someone to take the wheel and steer us in the right direction. I'm still convinced hes on track to do that and I'm genuinely looking forward to our full strength squad returning. We can replace him with a real tactician later down the line

Please describe what this method of play is and then also describe how he has backed this up with his team selections. Including what his method is when we are not the underdog team that can play on the counter and why when Pogba was injured Matic played and why Mata/Pereira have been playing RW
 
Before they even had chance, we should have put the game to bed. We missed few easy chances too, they went all out attack around 65th min mark, as any good team at home would do.
It was blow for blow at some point, yes. They missed 3 or 4 one on ones with DDG from memory either with headers inside the six-yard box or from diagonal shots. On paper they had the better finishers though, which IMO failed them in that game.

We had narrow wins where the opposition also missed clear cut chances. The big difference is however we looked much more compact when protecting the lead. One reason possibly is physical condition, the other however is the confidence when we were on a winning run. When he was interim we didn't look like conceding most of the time, whilst now it's only matter of when.
These same arguments hold up in the other direction for our lesser run. Anyway, this was about Pogba and Martial, and whether they will improve us going forward.
Which is my point that "luck" eventually evens out. The dire run is not based on luck or couple of players missing.

Without Pogba and Martial we looked good in the first half against Pool. We should have a plan B and don't pin all our hopes on Pogba and Martial, especially considering the latter injury problems from time to time.
 
No, because of your reply. I notice how you ignored Ron Atkinson. Fergie took years to create his dominating sides, he almost got the sack too. As I said before, United do not have a god given right to win. All I ask is they challenge and do so with style and commitment. Your comments disregard the history and ethos of this club as it has always built rather than bought. Mourinho and LvG were two of the greatest managers in the world and where did they get us?

Ole may not be the best but he has a true love for this club and he should be given a fair chance. So far he has massively improved the defence, bought three very exciting players and he has got rid of some overpriced dead wood in Lukaku and Sanchez. He's also giving the youngsters a chance and trying to get United back playing a fast attacking style. The trouble is the modern football fans want to see galacticos, £100m transfers for every position and to win at all costs, they don't afford time and expect it all instantly. Yes I agree Ole is inexperienced and yes I agree he's making mistakes BUT his ethos is spot on and I can see what he's trying to do. He knows and loves United and knows how the club should be run and how the football should be played. The disrespect Ole gets is disgusting imho. Personally though I wish he hadn't taken the job as his legacy could be tarnished and he doesn't deserve that.

Ole ? United ? Fast attacking style ?
 
No, because of your reply. I notice how you ignored Ron Atkinson. Fergie took years to create his dominating sides, he almost got the sack too. As I said before, United do not have a god given right to win. All I ask is they challenge and do so with style and commitment. Your comments disregard the history and ethos of this club as it has always built rather than bought. Mourinho and LvG were two of the greatest managers in the world and where did they get us?

Ole may not be the best but he has a true love for this club and he should be given a fair chance. So far he has massively improved the defence, bought three very exciting players and he has got rid of some overpriced dead wood in Lukaku and Sanchez. He's also giving the youngsters a chance and trying to get United back playing a fast attacking style. The trouble is the modern football fans want to see galacticos, £100m transfers for every position and to win at all costs, they don't afford time and expect it all instantly. Yes I agree Ole is inexperienced and yes I agree he's making mistakes BUT his ethos is spot on and I can see what he's trying to do. He knows and loves United and knows how the club should be run and how the football should be played. The disrespect Ole gets is disgusting imho. Personally though I wish he hadn't taken the job as his legacy could be tarnished and he doesn't deserve that.

This is complete nonsense, infact one of the main reasons people want rid of Woodward was because he was chasing galactico signings

Ole has not been implementing a fast attacking style either
 
It was blow for blow at some point, yes. They missed 3 or 4 one on ones with DDG from memory either with headers inside the six-yard box or from diagonal shots. On paper they had the better finishers though, which IMO failed them in that game.

Like I said, upto 65th min we created better chances and after that they went all out attack and we just defended.
2019-01-13-1171237-xG-plot-Tottenham-Hotspur-0-1-Man-Utd.jpg
 
We are merely game-raising cnuts though:
8 points against Chelsea, Leicester, Arsenal & Liverpool.
2 against Wolves, CP, Southampton, West Ham & Newcastle.

I'll be surprised if we are not farther away by the end of these 4 games.


I disagree - it's not a question of "Game raising" it's a question of OGS has one game plan - Sit back, defend deep and catch on the break. When a team sits back against them, United have nothing and doesn't have the Midfield to dominate a match centered in Midfield

Yes, he was astute against Klopp, but he doesnt have a plan B.

The good news is the other relegation contenders will not get as many points against the top 6 (Including LCFC) as United
 
The thing is, you'd expect a managers influence to show more as time goes on. There's other factors to consider with those first games under Ole, especially when it comes to motivation of the players. If I'm honest, I felt there were plenty of poor performances in that winning run too, Solskjaer said the same himself, but they all seem to get lumped in with the Cardiff performance where the football was free-flowing.

In answer to your question, all I'm saying is it's not guaranteed. The thing with Pogba, which some won't admit, is that he wouldn't have brought the same energy and resolute performance that we saw from our midfield at the weekend and vs PSG. He might bring more quality, he might continue to frustrate. He's an enigma really. The same goes for Martial too. More quality than Rashford but less determination, so when the quality isn't shining through, what are you left with? A passenger really. He looked good earlier in the season, but that is a small drop in the ocean compared to his performances over the last few years. Including after Ole got made permanent.

Mirrors my own thoughts. Good post
 
Let me ask you a rhetorical question. Would you rather end up 12th two season in a row and then have a squad that is capable of challenging for the league two-three years from now, or would you rather keep on as we have done under LvG and Jose, and get top 6 consistently because you keep filling the squad with stop gap solutions
I would rather keep getting top 6 consistently and progress from there, at least then, we would be keeping relatively competitive and showing progress in the short-term, allowing us to easier attract better players and keep our better players, than completely gutting the squad, lowering the standards and finishing bottom half on a promise that we will be challenging for the league in a few years, as that scenario is just empty words and false hope to me.

There's no guarantee whatsoever that we will be challenging for the league in 2/3 years after this 'necessary' process. He's already botched this summer window gutting the squad of experience without replacements, dropping us down the table like a stone. What evidence do you have to point to that shows you, that Solskjaer has the necessary credentials and know-how that he's even capable of such a rebuild anyway?

You really think he is capable of going head to head with the best managers in the league, competing for the title in the future, when he struggles against lesser managers in the league right now?

Let's say we finish 12th this season. Good luck getting any ambitious top talents to join the team in the summer, it just wouldn't happen, then you face losing your better players also, then you would have to ask yourself if this ''2-3 year plan'' is really going to work after-all?

Before you know it, you're just an arrogant mid-table club living firmly in the past (ala AC Milan), because that's what it looks like where we are heading to me.
 
Last edited:
His team managed a paltry 2 shots on target against Liverpool. He has 4 wins in 22. His teams can't score more than 1 goal in a game which puts a massive amount of pressure on our defence. I just don't see it with him. Will it take us being in the relegation zone at xmas for people to wake up and smell the coffee?
 
The thing is, you'd expect a managers influence to show more as time goes on. There's other factors to consider with those first games under Ole, especially when it comes to motivation of the players. If I'm honest, I felt there were plenty of poor performances in that winning run too, Solskjaer said the same himself, but they all seem to get lumped in with the Cardiff performance where the football was free-flowing.

In answer to your question, all I'm saying is it's not guaranteed. The thing with Pogba, which some won't admit, is that he wouldn't have brought the same energy and resolute performance that we saw from our midfield at the weekend and vs PSG. He might bring more quality, he might continue to frustrate. He's an enigma really. The same goes for Martial too. More quality than Rashford but less determination, so when the quality isn't shining through, what are you left with? A passenger really. He looked good earlier in the season, but that is a small drop in the ocean compared to his performances over the last few years. Including after Ole got made permanent.

What the run does show. Is that the players Ole inherited are not as rubbish as he makes out, and the 2nd place they finished is closer to where the squad Ole took over should be. Granted, losing Herrera and getting rid of Lukaku and Fellaini without any replacement has made the squad weaker, even if defence has been strengthened, but that’s down to the manager.
 
Let me ask you a rhetorical question. Would you rather end up 12th two season in a row and then have a squad that is capable of challenging for the league two-three years from now, or would you rather keep on as we have done under LvG and Jose, and get top 6 consistently because you keep filling the squad with stop gap solutions

Not going to happen under Ole. He’ll finish 12-14, if he stays benchmark will only get lowered further more. Until winning the championship will be viewed as a sign of his greatness
 
Status
Not open for further replies.