Fluctuation0161
Full Member
Killed my dream.13th
Killed my dream.13th
Could be. I mean, at some point we'll surely start winning a few games. Even in our worse seasons post SAF we tend to hover between 5th to 8th.We are merely game-raising cnuts though:
8 points against Chelsea, Leicester, Arsenal & Liverpool.
2 against Wolves, CP, Southampton, West Ham & Newcastle.
I'll be surprised if we are not farther away by the end of these 4 games.
We are merely game-raising cnuts though:
8 points against Chelsea, Leicester, Arsenal & Liverpool.
2 against Wolves, CP, Southampton, West Ham & Newcastle.
I'll be surprised if we are not farther away by the end of these 4 games.
We are merely game-raising cnuts though:
8 points against Chelsea, Leicester, Arsenal & Liverpool.
2 against Wolves, CP, Southampton, West Ham & Newcastle.
I'll be surprised if we are not farther away by the end of these 4 games.
Killed my dream.
I expect those teams to adapt while playing United; almost everyone knows now what this United team can and cannot do.We struggle against low block defensive sides because our attackers need space to be effective. That's the key reason that the results look the way they do.
The next 4 - 5 games are against lesser sides that are more expansive so in theory we should see an improvement in results, if not then I really see it being the end of the road for Ole. We'll have Pogba and Martial back too. Even Sheffield United put on a high press which if broken can lead to good break away opportunities.
But that's exactly what raising game means: being more determined when playing the big boys. Rashford was the best example: he couldn't be arsed to even make rudimentary runs against Newcastle but against Liverpool he was all bustle. Of course, most of our fans buy it.It's not that we're game-raising cnuts but that this team is good to play only the underdog role, i.e. when it is not expected to dominate.
Ole doesn't seem to know how to coach possession based attacking football which we are expected to play against most teams in the league.
I expect those teams to adapt while playing United; almost everyone knows now what this United team can and cannot do.
But that's exactly what raising game means: being more determined when playing the big boys. Rashford was the best example: he couldn't be arsed to even make rudimentary runs against Newcastle but against Liverpool he was all bustle. Of course, most of our fans buy it.
Agree about Ole's inability to coach.
Fair enough; it's hard to wipe the memory of how bad that Newcastle performance was.He was rested a bit during International week. He played only 17 mins against the Czech and 70 odd minutes in a won game and low tempo against Bulgaria. Scored a good goal and brought some of his confidence back.
But the fact of the matter is, SAF never put himself in a position where he solely relied on kids. That season in 2006/07, he brought in 33 year old Solskjaer & 36 year old Larsson. I'm sure he had an idea about what Jose was talking about.
We also still had 28 year old Saha & 25 year old Smith. Look at the rest of that squad; 36 VDS, 33 Giggs, 32 Scholes, 31 Neville, 28 Heinze & Ferdinand, 25 year old Park, Carrick & Evra. Absolute ton's of experience still.
That's how you develop young talents whilst not dropping your standards.
I expect those teams to adapt while playing United; almost everyone knows now what this United team can and cannot do.
Fair enough, will be interesting to see what those games are like. But you are right: if United don't get 8-10 points from them, top 4 will be gone and Ole's position should be untenable.It depends, I think a lot more coaches seem to be philosophy driven these days.
Overtaken by Sheff Utd my brother. Back in the promise land of 14th. I never fancied 13th anyway.13th
Agree with this.It's not that we're game-raising cnuts but that this team is good to play only the underdog role, i.e. when it is not expected to dominate.
Ole doesn't seem to know how to coach possession based attacking football which we are expected to play against most teams in the league.
In the league, we scored 1.71 goals per game last season under Ole. This season we are on 1.11 per game, and that's including the 4 goals vs Chelsea, a game in which they were both involved. Look at our alternatives when they are injured, I think you may be underrating their importance.Both of them played together a long time before their respective injuries and we were still shit. Pogba wants out of the club and Martial's body language when he is not in the mood leaves much to be desired. A lot of people will be disappointed to have pinned their hopes on them reviving us.
Perhaps the short term memory ignores the games that came before PSG? Regardless, it shouldn't be controversial to expect us to look better with two of our best attacking players returning. Do you not think they would make any difference?I don't get how so many have short memories. As you said, they've played many times in this poor run since Ole got made permanent. Hell we actually achieved another decent performance against the odds last season vs PSG and people were saying the exact same then. "We should only get better when Pogba is back", but it didn't work out that way at all. He came back at the same time our season imploded once again.
Perhaps the short term memory ignores the games that came before PSG? Regardless, it shouldn't be controversial to expect us to look better with two of our best attacking players returning. Do you not think they would make any difference?
I think you are overestimating the run before PSG. We were likely to drop points in many games and that luck Ole seems to be adamant about was with us at the time, along with the confidence of a winning streak.
Still can't believe we managed to win at Spurs - they completely battered us and DDG has his last worldie till date.
These same arguments hold up in the other direction for our lesser run. Anyway, this was about Pogba and Martial, and whether they will improve us going forward.I think you are overestimating the run before PSG. We were likely to drop points in many games and that luck Ole seems to be adamant about was with us at the time, along with the confidence of a winning streak.
Still can't believe we managed to win at Spurs - they completely battered us and DDG has his last worldie till date.
Perhaps the short term memory ignores the games that came before PSG? Regardless, it shouldn't be controversial to expect us to look better with two of our best attacking players returning. Do you not think they would make any difference?
No, because of your reply. I notice how you ignored Ron Atkinson. Fergie took years to create his dominating sides, he almost got the sack too. As I said before, United do not have a god given right to win. All I ask is they challenge and do so with style and commitment. Your comments disregard the history and ethos of this club as it has always built rather than bought. Mourinho and LvG were two of the greatest managers in the world and where did they get us?
Ole may not be the best but he has a true love for this club and he should be given a fair chance. So far he has massively improved the defence, bought three very exciting players and he has got rid of some overpriced dead wood in Lukaku and Sanchez. He's also giving the youngsters a chance and trying to get United back playing a fast attacking style. The trouble is the modern football fans want to see galacticos, £100m transfers for every position and to win at all costs, they don't afford time and expect it all instantly. Yes I agree Ole is inexperienced and yes I agree he's making mistakes BUT his ethos is spot on and I can see what he's trying to do. He knows and loves United and knows how the club should be run and how the football should be played. The disrespect Ole gets is disgusting imho. Personally though I wish he hadn't taken the job as his legacy could be tarnished and he doesn't deserve that.
We'd definitely better off with Martial and Pogba than without them. But my guess something like 8th instead of 14th. With of without those two, Ole appears to simply be an average football manager.These same arguments hold up in the other direction for our lesser run. Anyway, this was about Pogba and Martial, and whether they will improve us going forward.
The SAF thing is the worst. Let's give every manager plenty of time no matter how useless they are because... SAF. I wonder if the same posters believe we don't need to improve the 'structure' because it worked for SAF. Or why we should stick to 442 because.. SAF. Jaysus, move with the times people. Manchester United is a bigger beast now. We have to have high standards because we've been managed by the great man. Rather than pretending he never came when it comes to standards and accountability and remembering he did when it comes to assuming everyone to be his clone.1) SAF Comparison.. as mentioned elsewhere by others please stop. Ole is not SAF, he’s not even Sam Allerdyce who actually keeps crap teams up.
2) Deadwood Young, Jones, still at the club, ask anyone in May who are the deadwood none would have said Herrera, Lukaku, or even Fellaini if you asked in Dec. Yes Fellaini and Lukaku were people would have liked to have seen sold and replaced with more technical players. But the way Ole got rid of them showed his naivety.
3) Win at all cost. Ole falls into this category. Although he rarely succeeds. He turns into Wimbledon against big teams, and to keep himself in a job talks as he’s a Pep like coach with a deep style of playing. After 10 months it’s obvious he doesn’t have his own unique ideas
4) He knows and loves United.... great let’s pick a random from the fan at OT and make him manager. Tbh, what had Ole said that fans haven’t been saying before he was made manager. We need to play a fluid front 3, drop Lukaku give Martial/ Rashford more chances, buy players who become world class at United. All stuff fans say... Very easy to say, the doing is hard.
5) Disrespect Ole gets.... A teacher giving a student a fail is not disrespect.
This narrative of him being clueless is lazy criticism. I trust the judgement of someone who's lived and breathed professional football for 30 years over armchair tacticians who are demanding Angel Gomes start in every prematch thread.
Moyes philosophy was to get to the line and cross. He removed vital back room staff, failed to motivate his team with bizarre training routines and poor man management, and chased targets who were either unobtainable or unneeded, sometimes both. Could we describe him as clueless. I dont think so. Old fashioned, unprepared and maybe ill advised, but a man with his career isn't clueless on how to manage a football club.
LVG, to his credit turned us in the right direction but didn't back up his possession orientated philosophy with the right signings. In fact, some of his signings directly contradicted the method he wanted to implement and stifled our progress into becoming a possesion based team.
Jose never really settled on a philosophy, as is his pragmatic way. But the football was often dull and our most memorable tactics where using Fellaini to either bully back posters or break up the play on the edge of our area to shutdown a game. His downfall was poor man management, (which almost resulted in squad mutiny) and attempting to force questionable short sighted transfer business.
In comparison, Ole and his staff do have a method of playing despite what 'armchair tacticians' say. He has backed up this method with his transfer business and team selections. And he has maintained the support of the his staff and sqaud despite a poor run in form.
He's not a master tactician, and that's not what we need at the moment. We just need someone to take the wheel and steer us in the right direction. I'm still convinced hes on track to do that and I'm genuinely looking forward to our full strength squad returning. We can replace him with a real tactician later down the line
It was blow for blow at some point, yes. They missed 3 or 4 one on ones with DDG from memory either with headers inside the six-yard box or from diagonal shots. On paper they had the better finishers though, which IMO failed them in that game.Before they even had chance, we should have put the game to bed. We missed few easy chances too, they went all out attack around 65th min mark, as any good team at home would do.
Which is my point that "luck" eventually evens out. The dire run is not based on luck or couple of players missing.These same arguments hold up in the other direction for our lesser run. Anyway, this was about Pogba and Martial, and whether they will improve us going forward.
No, because of your reply. I notice how you ignored Ron Atkinson. Fergie took years to create his dominating sides, he almost got the sack too. As I said before, United do not have a god given right to win. All I ask is they challenge and do so with style and commitment. Your comments disregard the history and ethos of this club as it has always built rather than bought. Mourinho and LvG were two of the greatest managers in the world and where did they get us?
Ole may not be the best but he has a true love for this club and he should be given a fair chance. So far he has massively improved the defence, bought three very exciting players and he has got rid of some overpriced dead wood in Lukaku and Sanchez. He's also giving the youngsters a chance and trying to get United back playing a fast attacking style. The trouble is the modern football fans want to see galacticos, £100m transfers for every position and to win at all costs, they don't afford time and expect it all instantly. Yes I agree Ole is inexperienced and yes I agree he's making mistakes BUT his ethos is spot on and I can see what he's trying to do. He knows and loves United and knows how the club should be run and how the football should be played. The disrespect Ole gets is disgusting imho. Personally though I wish he hadn't taken the job as his legacy could be tarnished and he doesn't deserve that.
No, because of your reply. I notice how you ignored Ron Atkinson. Fergie took years to create his dominating sides, he almost got the sack too. As I said before, United do not have a god given right to win. All I ask is they challenge and do so with style and commitment. Your comments disregard the history and ethos of this club as it has always built rather than bought. Mourinho and LvG were two of the greatest managers in the world and where did they get us?
Ole may not be the best but he has a true love for this club and he should be given a fair chance. So far he has massively improved the defence, bought three very exciting players and he has got rid of some overpriced dead wood in Lukaku and Sanchez. He's also giving the youngsters a chance and trying to get United back playing a fast attacking style. The trouble is the modern football fans want to see galacticos, £100m transfers for every position and to win at all costs, they don't afford time and expect it all instantly. Yes I agree Ole is inexperienced and yes I agree he's making mistakes BUT his ethos is spot on and I can see what he's trying to do. He knows and loves United and knows how the club should be run and how the football should be played. The disrespect Ole gets is disgusting imho. Personally though I wish he hadn't taken the job as his legacy could be tarnished and he doesn't deserve that.
It was blow for blow at some point, yes. They missed 3 or 4 one on ones with DDG from memory either with headers inside the six-yard box or from diagonal shots. On paper they had the better finishers though, which IMO failed them in that game.
We are merely game-raising cnuts though:
8 points against Chelsea, Leicester, Arsenal & Liverpool.
2 against Wolves, CP, Southampton, West Ham & Newcastle.
I'll be surprised if we are not farther away by the end of these 4 games.
The thing is, you'd expect a managers influence to show more as time goes on. There's other factors to consider with those first games under Ole, especially when it comes to motivation of the players. If I'm honest, I felt there were plenty of poor performances in that winning run too, Solskjaer said the same himself, but they all seem to get lumped in with the Cardiff performance where the football was free-flowing.
In answer to your question, all I'm saying is it's not guaranteed. The thing with Pogba, which some won't admit, is that he wouldn't have brought the same energy and resolute performance that we saw from our midfield at the weekend and vs PSG. He might bring more quality, he might continue to frustrate. He's an enigma really. The same goes for Martial too. More quality than Rashford but less determination, so when the quality isn't shining through, what are you left with? A passenger really. He looked good earlier in the season, but that is a small drop in the ocean compared to his performances over the last few years. Including after Ole got made permanent.
I would rather keep getting top 6 consistently and progress from there, at least then, we would be keeping relatively competitive and showing progress in the short-term, allowing us to easier attract better players and keep our better players, than completely gutting the squad, lowering the standards and finishing bottom half on a promise that we will be challenging for the league in a few years, as that scenario is just empty words and false hope to me.Let me ask you a rhetorical question. Would you rather end up 12th two season in a row and then have a squad that is capable of challenging for the league two-three years from now, or would you rather keep on as we have done under LvG and Jose, and get top 6 consistently because you keep filling the squad with stop gap solutions
Why does he still have a job?4 wins in 22 since that PSG game...
Why does he still have a job?
Apparently being shite in the short term is good for the long term.Why does he still have a job?
The thing is, you'd expect a managers influence to show more as time goes on. There's other factors to consider with those first games under Ole, especially when it comes to motivation of the players. If I'm honest, I felt there were plenty of poor performances in that winning run too, Solskjaer said the same himself, but they all seem to get lumped in with the Cardiff performance where the football was free-flowing.
In answer to your question, all I'm saying is it's not guaranteed. The thing with Pogba, which some won't admit, is that he wouldn't have brought the same energy and resolute performance that we saw from our midfield at the weekend and vs PSG. He might bring more quality, he might continue to frustrate. He's an enigma really. The same goes for Martial too. More quality than Rashford but less determination, so when the quality isn't shining through, what are you left with? A passenger really. He looked good earlier in the season, but that is a small drop in the ocean compared to his performances over the last few years. Including after Ole got made permanent.
Let me ask you a rhetorical question. Would you rather end up 12th two season in a row and then have a squad that is capable of challenging for the league two-three years from now, or would you rather keep on as we have done under LvG and Jose, and get top 6 consistently because you keep filling the squad with stop gap solutions