The current problems are not Ole's fault in any way. The team (and him) were hamstrung when United messed up Herrera's contract negotiations so bad he got his head turned by PSG and left, AND then Woodward failed to sign the midfielder United already needed last season and now CRITICALLY needed.
Because of this failure, Pogba has to be played out of position, and either Mata (still good in passing but physically not the player United need anymore) or Lingard (playing like garbage for God knows how many months now) have to be in the team. If you push Pogba up higher, you have to bring in Matic, who is also extremely limited and not up to the level required.
Even if you brought in Pep Guardiola tomorrow, that would still be the situation. United will not be successful until the situation at the top changes, and the situation at the top will not change until the club becomes unprofitable.
So why Ole did you let two attacking forwards leave and subsidise matority of his wages and not replace either or the void Fellaini left.
First off, how do you figure it was him who did the letting?
Second, it's laughable that suddenly Alexis, who has been WRETCHEDLY awful for United in all but ... one? of his games, is being portrayed as some kind of saviour. He is the worst signing United have ever made, because he played like garbage, and was on massive, financially crippling wages.
Lukaku was also an extremely unreliable finisher last season, and you can go to pretty much any matchday thread and find pages of people complaining about him missing absolute sitters game after game. He was also, by all accounts, a bad influence in the dressing room.
Both players 100% needed to go. I definitely agree that an attacking player should have been brought in regardless, but that doesn't change that both Alexis and Lukaku
needed to go.